Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • we dont get N157 because its new OCMC but no court dont have evidence either.   Just seems a bit of a pointless wait but oh well
    • Post #9 suggested some options to avoid or put off having a smart meter. Post #12 a simple solution to your complaint about the ay they handle fixed monthly DD. It's not really clear why you posted if you're going get irate when members "jump in" with suggestions. You can see what I'm referring to on "gasracker.uk" to allay your suspicion that I was lying in Post #16 which was made to correct ther misinformation shown in your Post #15
    • Back to octopus from the smart meter/tariff salesperson. Octopus have now said just ignore the letter - I dont have to have one despite there letter implying (at least) it was required, but that i will HAVE to have a smart meter if current meters stop working as 'their suppliers dont supply non smart meters any more'. They also say they do not/will not disable any smart functionality when they fit a smart meter I am of course going to challenge that. Thats their choice of meter fitter/supplier problem not mine
    • Point taken that we should inform new Caggers that the £20 option is there in wrong registration cases.  Well, supposedly there, who knows what the PPCs would do in practice.  Anyway, the option is allegedly there with both the BPA as you say, but also the IPC (I've just checked). However, there's a danger here of baby, bathwater. The two easiest types of cases to win are (a) residential - due to Supremacy of Contract and (b) wrong registration - due to "de minimis".  Indeed until recently we has been boasting that no Caggers, over two years, who had sent a PPC the wrong registration snotty letter, had even been taken to court, let alone lost a court hearing. We simply can do nothing about a terrible judge.  The judge seems - I say seems because we haven't had all the details - to have ignored "de minimis",. got fixated on a sign and awarded unreasonable behaviour costs.  A totally bizarre judgement.
    • You mean your witness statement 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Sainsbury’s London - stopped for unpaid item but no address taken


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2299 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there, I’m having sleepless nights with worry

 

About 2 weeks ago, I went through a self check out and bought 2 things, one of the things was under my arm as I was on the phone at the time.

 

I forgot to pay for it (no sarcasm please)

 

I left the store,

showing how innocent I am,

I was stood looking in the window of the holiday shop next door browsing at the offers,

the security guard approched me and said you hadn’t paid for an item

 

I went back in store, paid for the item, apologised about 8 times.

 

I paid for the item then he said can you come with me,

I went to the back office

 

He asked for my name and DOB

 

No address or ID was asked

 

I gave my correct details but obviously there will be more than one John Smiths in London.

 

He said you’re banned for life from all sainsburys and told me to leave.

 

I still apologised; saying I’m sorry

 

Then I left.

 

I haven’t heard anything since?

Should there be issue?

Would rather just know, but even then it’s hard to see how he’s ever get in contact unless I went back into a store.

 

I work in a financial services job,

so was relieved he didn’t ring the police etc,

even then I think with no previous criminal record I could probably explain my actions and be let go,

as I’ve never been convicted of any offence or even spoken to the police in my life.

 

Can anyone advise?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rest assured that if no address was given or a copy of ID taken then nothing further will happen. We would normally be advising about potential letters from a civil recovery organisation but that cannot be the case here - unless, potentially you used a Nectar card with what you did purchase and you details are picked up from that, but this is a very very remote possibility, so please don't dwell on it. Carry on with you life and put it behind you.

 

As for a ban - I would certainly avoid shopping in that particular branch for a while - although they could only ask you to leave if you did, this may be a bit embarrassing, but a guard in one store does not have the authority to ban you for life from every Sainsburys. If policu there is the same as at any other major supermarket group then this could only be done, by letter, from Head Office.

 

So, relax and stop worrying. Police will not have, nor will they ever be informed, and with no idea of where you live, you will not receive any spurious demands for money

 

I have moved your post to a more appropriate forum

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

nothing will happen

forget about it.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

they decided to let you pay for the item.

That is the end of the matter.

 

they cant trace you from your debit card details,

if that was allowble every fraudster in the world would be dippng into your account details whenever they felt like it,

I would have thought you would know that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome.

 

As the others have advised, there is nothing to stress over in this matter. I have actually done the same as you but as I am a regular at this small store, they understood and let me pay. This was a Co-Op and not Sainsbugs.

 

You paid by Debit Card and it is correct that all they can glean from that is the card number and only the last 4 digits too. The rest is covered by the computers.

 

It sickens me that some stores treat ALL cases as shoplifting. People have 'Senior Moments' all the time so store security should be better trained to understand that these things happen and not to treat everyone as a thief. I appreciate that store security have no idea whether you have done this before but body language is a good sign.

 

Anyhoo, minor rant over. You won't hear from any civil recovery company and as an aside, you have no obligation to give security staff any details at all, especially if you did nothing wrong. Stand your ground and refuse to go with them into their 'office' and if forced, you call the police.

 

Try to forget it if you can. Nothing to worry about.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...