Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Better version attached with the late appeal explained more clearly for the judge. This will sound silly, but I think it would be a good idea to e-mail it to the court and UKPC on Sunday.  It's probably me being daft, but Sunday is still March, and as it's late, sending it in March rather than April will make it sound like it was less late than it really is.  if you get my drift. You can still pop in a paper version on Tuesday if you want. E-mail address for the court: [email protected] And for UKPC: [email protected]   [email protected] Defendant WS.pdf
    • Update 15th March the eviction notice period expired, and I paid my next month rent along with sending them the message discussed above. After a short while they just emailed me back this dry phrase "Thank you for your email." In two weeks' time I'm gonna need to pay the rent again, and I have such a feeling that shortly after that date the contracts will be exchanged and all the payments will be made.  Now my main concern is, if possible, not to end up paying rent after I move out.  
    • they cant 'take away' anything, what ever makes you believe that?  dx  
    • The text on the N1SDT Claim Form 1.The claim is for breaching the terms and conditions set on private land. 2. The defendant's vehicle, NumberPlate, was identified in the Leeds Bradford Airport Roadways on the 28/07/2023 in breach of the advertised terms and conditions; namely Stopping in a zone where stopping is prohibited 3.At all material times the Defendant was the registered keeper and/or driver. 4. The terms and conditions upon  entering private land were clearly displayed at the entrance and in prominent locations 5. The sign was the offer and the act of entering private land was the acceptance of the offer hereby entering into a contract by conduct. 6.The signs specifically detail the terms and conditions and the consequences of failure to comply,  namely a parking charge notice will be issued, and the Defendant has failed to settle the outstanding liability. 7.The claimant seeks the recovery of the parking charge notice, contractual costs and interest.   This is what I am thinking of for the wording of my defence The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and are generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is denied. It is denied that the Defendant ever entered into a contract to breach any terms and conditions of the stated private land. 2. Paragraph 2 and 4 are denied. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was only contracted to provide car park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. 3. It is admitted that Defendant is the recorded keeper of the vehicle. 4.  Paragraph 6 is denied the claimant has yet to evidence that their contract with the landowner supersedes  Leeds Bradford airport byelaws. Further it is denied that the Claimant’s signage is capable of creating a legally binding contract. 5. Paragraph 7 is denied, there are no contractual costs and interest cannot be accrued on a speculative charge.   I'm not sure whether point 4 is correct as I think this side road is not covered by byelaws? Any other suggestions/corrections would be appreciated.
    • Dear EVRi parcelnet LTD t/a evri   evri parcelnet isnt a thing also you say defendant's response which is a bit of a weird format.   Something like   Dear EVRi, Claim no xxxx In your defence you said you could not access tracking. Please see attached receipt and label Regards
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Blemain Together Loan featuring unfair charges!


mmd
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2212 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

I'm new on the CAG Forum but was directed here by the good folks at MSE.

 

I have long suffered at the hands of Blemain/Together.

 

I foolishly applied for a second charge loan over a decade ago.

 

It has been the (most expensive) bane of my life ever since.

 

I recently received a letter from Together stating that my original loan has now past its term.

 

It says,

 

As you will be aware,

your account with us has now reached the end of the original contractual term.

As your monthly repayments have not been sufficient to fully repay the balance,

the outstanding amount is now due.

This may be due to late payments, payments being missed or the application of admin costs to the loan

 

I am requesting SAR from them as I have a feeling that most of the outstanding balance is entirely made up of outrageous charges.

I've also been advised to look into an "unfair relationship" with them but I'm a little unsure where to start.

 

The outstanding amount is approx £11k!

How can this even be possible when I have paid almost £100k over the past 10 years?!!!

 

Is repossession an option at this stage?

 

They have already attempted a repo a few years ago when I missed some payments.

I went to court and duly arranged a repayment plan to clear the arrears.

The account has been in good order ever since.

 

Does anyone have any advice on how to deal with this shady bunch?

 

Any help would be greatly appreciated!

Link to post
Share on other sites

almost 100% you are correct

the balance will be all unlawful fees.

 

the sar will reveal all.

 

did they make you take out insurances too on the agreement...

 

have you still got it?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi dx,

thankyou for replying.

 

yes I had to pay for their additional insurances despite of course having my own buildings insurances etc at exhorbitant costs.

 

I have a recent breakdown of their charges dating from 2007-2010 which I requested a few months ago knowing that the loan was coming to an end.

Not sure why they did not supply charges from 2010-2017?

But they seem to make up their own rules from day to day don't they?

 

I have entered the charges I have to date into the CAG CIS Excel spreadsheet

- their costs and interest charges are totally inconsistent and are hard to make sense of.

Intentional I would imagine.

 

I'm not going to make another payment to them.

I need to see the SAR results first.

I'm hunting for my original loan agreement at the moment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you already had building ins

then provide them with proof

and they must refund+the int that cost you too.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I called tham a few months ago disputing the same point and they of course have NO record whatsoever of my buildings insurance anywhere even though they specifically asked for it to approve the loan in the first place.

 

Would this be something the SAR would reveal?

 

I will call my original insurers and try to locate some evidence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no they well known for this sadly.

they'll turn around and say that it was a bulk buy insurance and you cant be refunded

then its off to the FOS time.

 

they've nailed BH several times over them doing this already

 

don't forget your bank statements ill prove building ins too via a DD

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I've received another Loan Past Term letter, this time stating a completely different outstanding balance to the one mentioned in their previous letter! I despise these clowns.

 

I'm still awaiting SAR response and will update if/when anything happens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi sorry to hear of yet another Blemain / Together Finance Victim

 

 

The SAR may not reveal all but will reveal some as they are very clever at muddying the waters and not making things clear.

 

 

The most important document is the full and understandable account statement

they will not send this you have got to ask for it.

 

 

They may well send a statement of sorts but it will not have everything on you need to be able to clearly see every charge, penalty,including any admin. charges and a breakdown of the interest and any interest change.

 

 

you should calculate what you believe it to be and work out the difference.

 

 

Get stuck in take control and don't give in to any bullying, do not phone them use email as much as possible so you have a good clear record.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi suffering

thanks for taking the time to read and reply! I'm still awaiting the SAR - still a while to go yet.

 

I used to be terrified of this bunch as things always seemed to be on their terms....but not anymore!

 

Can I request a full and understandable account statement from them whilst still waiting for the SAR?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

ring and ask them where it is

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ring and ask them where it is

 

Or better still, call them and immediately follow through by sending an e-mail stating what you discussed and ensuring you have a written record (ie evidence) of what it is you are saying they have failed to do and what you are asking them to do to resolve the situation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ring and ask them where it is

 

thank you dx, I was dreading that having to talk to them would be the next step

 

Or better still, call them and immediately follow through by sending an e-mail stating what you discussed and ensuring you have a written record (ie evidence) of what it is you are saying they have failed to do and what you are asking them to do to resolve the situation.

 

great, thank you. I'll let you know what happens

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi MMD,

 

Sorry to peel back all the way to the beginning of your story, BUT... When you took out this second charge were you already with Blemain? If so can you tell me the steps you went through please...

 

I am specifically interested if they acknowledged you would refinance through them,

meaning:

1/. Payment of redemption fee (to them)

 

2/. Made you go to a broker only to take out the loan with themselves (Blemain/Together) again so you had to pay all associated costs (legal, brokerage, etc)

 

3/. If so did you freely choose the broker you used or were you directed? and

 

4/. If you used the same broker did they present you with a multitude of options or did they just say go to Blemain?

 

N.B. These question only apply if the first loan was with Blemain.

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again mmd you do not have to talk to them!

Send them an email (this way you have a record of the correspondence)

 

Its time to play them at their own game and put the frighteners on them tell them you have been advised to request a full and understandable breakdown of your account, as you are considering legal action against them.

 

Tell them their lack of co operation has been duly logged and noted.

Do not under any circumstances phone them they will deny all knowledge of anything they agree to do

Link to post
Share on other sites

thankyou for your advice suffering, I will avoid any future calls as I've learnt the hard way with phone calls to them in the past. everything will be in writing.

 

Is there a CAG template letter anywhere here that I could adapt and send?

 

Hi MMD,

 

Sorry to peel back all the way to the beginning of your story, BUT... When you took out this second charge were you already with Blemain? If so can you tell me the steps you went through please...

 

I am specifically interested if they acknowledged you would refinance through them,

meaning:

1/. Payment of redemption fee (to them)

 

2/. Made you go to a broker only to take out the loan with themselves (Blemain/Together) again so you had to pay all associated costs (legal, brokerage, etc)

 

3/. If so did you freely choose the broker you used or were you directed? and

 

4/. If you used the same broker did they present you with a multitude of options or did they just say go to Blemain?

 

N.B. These question only apply if the first loan was with Blemain.

 

Thank you

 

Hello MaDeHall,

Thanks for reading this sorry plight! Here's what I can tell you...

 

No, I was not with Blemain before the second charge.

My main mortgage is with a proper building society.

 

So I guess your other questions don't apply?

The whole thing has been an extremely stressful, confusing & ridiculously expensive mess from start to finish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Get serious with them

 

 

write a letter, saying i have good reason to believe that you have added hidden charges and charges that are unfair, to my account i now put you on notice of this ,

 

I xxxxxx Put Together finance on full legal notice that i request the following information so i can investigate discrepancies with my account

I give you 30 days to produce unto me a full breakdown of all charges,penalties, fees and interest that have been added or removed to my account

since the account was first opened, so i and my team can check the legality of the information you provide,

if without good reason you cannot deliver unto me this information in full within 30 days of this letter then no added fees,

charges, and interest will be recognised or concidered owed.

(now thats what i would do but its up to you)

Link to post
Share on other sites

click sar

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a huge problem with this company.

I have now requested a SAR.

I cannot even begin to think of this company without my blood actually boiling.

They hit me so hard financially when i had hit hard times.

They even turned up to evict me on the day I moved out, and added that visit to the final charges.

Is there a way to claim any of this back, do we know?

Have you received the SAR yet?

I recently received a letter from them offering me a couple of hundred pounds back, which I did not respond to, as I feel it was a get out clause to get me sign that I would not make further claims against them.

I have in the past requested a breakdown of all cost, and is not complete.

Cannot believe they are allowed to continue like this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

So, instead of supplying a SAR within 40 days, they have instead sent a letter threatening litigation if I don't pay their redemption figure within 14 days - complete with yet another random 'final' figure that I've never seen before.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a huge problem with this company.

I have now requested a SAR.

I cannot even begin to think of this company without my blood actually boiling.

They hit me so hard financially when i had hit hard times.

They even turned up to evict me on the day I moved out, and added that visit to the final charges.

Is there a way to claim any of this back, do we know?

Have you received the SAR yet?

I recently received a letter from them offering me a couple of hundred pounds back, which I did not respond to, as I feel it was a get out clause to get me sign that I would not make further claims against them.

I have in the past requested a breakdown of all cost, and is not complete.

Cannot believe they are allowed to continue like this.

 

you need to start a new thread

of your own please

this thread is for advising MMD

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, instead of supplying a SAR within 40 days, they have instead sent a letter threatening litigation if I don't pay their redemption figure within 14 days - complete with yet another random 'final' figure that I've never seen before.

 

send our SAR failure letter

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...