Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
    • thank you you mean you got a notice of discontinuance? dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

UAE debt IDRWW chasing in UK


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1990 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

Can someone give me some advice? I left the UAE in debt some years ago, a long story but not dis-similar to many others you will have heard.

 

I have been contacted by a UK company (IDRWW.com) who have been instructed by the original bank.

 

I do own my own flat in the UK, although it is mortgaged and has little or no equity in it.

 

Can someone tell me what steps I should take?

 

What can IDRWW do?

 

Are they likely to try to make me bankrupt

or put a charge against my home?

 

Does anyone have any experience with this company

 

and what they will accept or what they are after?

 

IDRWW have given me 7 days to reply.

 

Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

 

Tobe

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Can someone give me some advice? I left the UAE in debt some years ago, a long story but not dis-similar to many others you will have heard.

 

I have been contacted by a UK company (IDRWW.com) who have been instructed by the original bank.

 

I do own my own flat in the UK, although it is mortgaged and has little or no equity in it.

 

Can someone tell me what steps I should take? ignore them

 

What can IDRWW do? nothing

 

Are they likely to try to make me bankrupt nope

or put a charge against my home? nope

 

Does anyone have any experience with this company yes lots of threads here simply you know who trying a differing name game

 

and what they will accept or what they are after? to fleece you blind

IDRWW have given me 7 days to reply. shame they are a powerlessDCA and ARE NOT BAILIFFS

Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

 

Tobe

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

never ignore

 

how much and when from

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think around £15k from 7 yrs ago.

Would statue barred be a defence?

I know the limitations are longer in the UAE (15yrs I think) but if CWD aka IDRWW are going to make an SD that would be a UK court application.. which rules apply?

 

Tobe

Link to post
Share on other sites

willy waving

ignore them.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think around £15k from 7 yrs ago. Would statue barred be a defence? I know the limitations are longer in the UAE (15yrs I think) but if CWD aka IDRWW are going to make an SD that would be a UK court application.. which rules apply?

 

Tobe

 

Do you own any UK property assets ? Be aware that checks are made on land registry to see whether it is worth pursuing a debtor, beyond general chasing.

 

You can ignore, but IF you ever received any court papers directly from a court, obviously you do not ignore those.

 

If you receive an SD, come back here with the details.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

THe Client has to make the claim

and they have no jurisdiction in the UK wrong court.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I do own a flat but the equity is negligible.

It might even be in negative equity.

 

I’ve read lots of conflicting advice, some state the SB limitations are viewed by UAE ruling not UK.

There seems to be no successful cases, or people don’t update their threads.

 

I have a small child.

is it worth putting forward a payment offer?

At what point should I start truly panicking?

I obviously don’t want to be homeless but can’t afford very much at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you wont lose your home

this is not UAE we don't jail people.

 

there are a few successful cases yes

BUT

those are either plants [fake people put up to gander publicity and hence money through other then panicking]

 

or

back door claim whereby the person knew nowt about it.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you.

 

I realise I’m probably sounding nervous.

 

If the DCA request an SD that’s the first (and cheapest/easiest) step to filing bankruptcy isn’t it?

 

CWD sound quite happy to issue an SD, looks like their MO if I’m reading threads properly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

only the owner of a debt can issue proceedings

not some powerless DCA acting on behalf of a client [ the owner]

they are NOT BAILIFFS.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you will and can read allsorts of horror stories regarding red notices Interpol and alike

with people being detained at various airports inc Italy etc because of these debts

 

you'll also read about an organisation that appears to be operating some kind of knights in shining armour 'legal service'

'saving' them after days even months in 'prison' awaiting 'deportation'.

 

and that you can never search Interpol or anywhere to see if you have a 'red notice' against you other than directly writing to Interpol

 

once you keep reading [and scratching upon who owns the reporting sources and who really are these knights]

you'll find the 'news reports' or 'newspaper reports' funnily enough mention these knights as their source,

 

you'll also see them politely stating that some moderators or certain 'consumer help' websites

are in their eyes, good in meaning but fundamentally are flawed in their advice to ignore.

 

they then report the usual stunts of employers, ex employer,s neighbours relatives and all manner of anyone

the various guises of these debt collectors find and phone up to embarrass the debtor to 'pay up'.

 

ofcourse this publicises the knights and they get lots of business by people like you phoning them up and setting up 'affordable' payment plans via them to the UAE banks

 

one wonders if they profit from this too..........

 

3 people in p'haps +100'000 UAE debt runners... is it worth it?

 

obv I cant identify my source, but I know of numerous people that had never had

any letters

phonecalls

 

until they got scare then contacted the knights....

suddenly it all started to escalate and the like settlement figures via the knights went upwards...

 

UAE debt collection in a murky world

but lets put it this way...

 

UAE are the biggest red notice funder of Interpol

then that must also be true of the rest of the industry below them...

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’m not worried about Interpol, I’m not a big enough fish.

 

I’m worried that this will escalate quickly and i’ll be jumping from the frying pan into the fire.

 

The general consensus seems to be request a prove it or CCA. Ignoring these guys, especially when you have assets, seems to be their ideal scenario.

 

I’m not sure how to request docs if I believe this is SB. Does anyone know?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Because such requests are really under UAE law and not UK, a CCA request or any other UK legal request for information is not relevant.

 

If you want to write to them, it will just be a standard letter that is required as there is no template.

You simply request a copy of any alleged orgina financial agreement document that exists between you and x UAE Bank, with a copy in English.

 

Advise them that all terms and conditions relating to the account must be supplied in English.

also request a copy of all statements of accounts with any attached notes in English.

And ask for a copy of any default notice and termination notice in English.

And finally, you require a copy of any legal documentation that evidences that x UAE Bank has authorised IDRWW to contact you in regard to this alleged debt.

 

Remember this is an alleged debt. NEVER admit to owing a debt in writing.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

then i'd keep quiet

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Look up the term Champerty and Maintenance whilst you are waiting for the next letter.

their no win no fee approach may well be a risky strategy for them. If I was owed money i wouldnt want to have an agreement with someone who only negotiates their fee after they have collected the money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

then i'd keep quiet

 

Thank you both.

 

I’m sure it’s SB (under UK terms).

 

Can’t imagine DCA can bring UAE statute to a UK court.

 

If the debt is covered by FCA rules surely UK laws/statutes apply too???

 

In a UAE court many things would be different. Ok, enough speculation,

 

i’ll kick things off and let you know what happens.

Thanks again.

Tobe

Link to post
Share on other sites

which is why I pointed out about jurisdiction of any UK court on any UAE debt

please

don't go contacting any powerless DCA..

if you are really itching to be stupid and contact anyone

do it directly to the original creditor = the DCA's client.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only problem with that is if I contact them then the status becomes current as it will reset the clock in Dubai.

Although the DCA has no ‘powers’ they can issue a Statutory Demand and pursue me on the original creditor’s behalf.

 

I either challenge this in the UK or reset the clock in UAE...

I have no experience in this field (and no one seems to be able to offer a definitive opinion) but I’m hoping the UK system is applicable if taken to a British Court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Most finance agreements issued in most countries do not restrict the agreement to courts in the country the agreement was issued in. So I would expect that your UAE finance agreement can be looked at by a court outside the UAE, including UK Courts. UK courts will hear foreign debt claims which were subject to finance agreements issued under another countries laws. So it would be UAE limitations law that applies and not UK.

 

However, any UK court would also have their own practices and even if the law was UAE law, it does not mean that a Judge would start applying UAE practice standards. For example, if you asked the UAE Banks agent for copies of documents mentioned earlier on this thread today and they were never supplied, you would bring this up with the UK court, if a claim was issued against you. So you do have the normal protections of UK court practices.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Although the DCA has no ‘powers’ they can issue a Statutory Demand and pursue me on the original creditor’s behalf.

 

no they cannot!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Most finance agreements issued in most countries do not restrict the agreement to courts in the country the agreement was issued in. So I would expect that your UAE finance agreement can be looked at by a court outside the UAE, including UK Courts. UK courts will hear foreign debt claims which were subject to finance agreements issued under another countries laws. So it would be UAE limitations law that applies and not UK.

 

However, any UK court would also have their own practices and even if the law was UAE law, it does not mean that a Judge would start applying UAE practice standards. For example, if you asked the UAE Banks agent for copies of documents mentioned earlier on this thread today and they were never supplied, you would bring this up with the UK court, if a claim was issued against you. So you do have the normal protections of UK court practices.

That makes sense. Thank you.

 

Although the DCA has no ‘powers’ they can issue a Statutory Demand and pursue me on the original creditor’s behalf.

 

no they cannot!!

 

Why not? If the DCA were a solicitor acting on behalf of their client, they could submit papers for a statutory demand etc. Couldn’t they? If not, why? Music to my ears to be honest but just wondering what rationale lies behind ‘No’.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...