Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hmm yes I see your point about proof of postage but nonetheless... "A Notice to Keeper can be served by ordinary post and the Protection of Freedoms Act requires that the Notice, to be valid,  must be delivered either (Where a notice to driver (parking ticket) has been served) Not earlier than 28 days after, nor more than 56 days after, the service of that notice to driver; or (Where no notice to driver has been served (e.g ANPR is used)) Not later than 14 days after the vehicle was parked A notice sent by post is to be presumed, unless the contrary is proved, to have been delivered on the second working day after the day on which it is posted; and for this purpose “working day” means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or a public holiday in England and Wales." My question there is really what might constitute proof? Since you say the issue of delivery is a common one I suppose that no satisfactory answer has been established or you would probably have told me.
    • I would stand your ground and go for the interest. Even if the interest is not awarded you will get the judgement and the worst that might happen is that you won't get your claim fee.  However, it is almost inevitable that you will get the interest.  It is correct that it is at the discretion of the judge but the discretion is almost always exercised in favour of the claimant in these cases.  I think you should stand your ground and don't give even the slightest penny away Another judgement against them on this issue would be very bad for them and they would be really stupid to risk it but if they did, it would cost them far more than the interest they are trying to save which they will most likely have to pay anyway
    • Yep, true to form, they are happy to just save a couple of quid... They invariably lose in court, so to them, that's a win. 😅
    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Accurate Reflection of Finances - defaults Lowell vodafone


gemspan
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2262 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there

 

I'm looking for some help and information.

 

I got a copy of my credit file the other day after being refused a car loan.

I was gobsmacked to see what had been going on.

 

Firstly,

Lowell appear to have bought a debt from Vodafone that doesn't in fact exist.

I had a 12 month contract with Vodafone and when it finished I moved to another provider as I got a better deal.

 

Vodafone tried to say that it was a 24 month agreement (which I know it wasn't as I wouldn't tie myself in for 2 years!)

 

I asked them for a copy of the agreement along with a copy of the telephone call wherein the contract was agreed.

 

They failed to respond...and failed to respond to a few follow up letters....

I thought that was the end of it.

Clearly this has been sold to Lowell without a contract agreement and they have placed a default on my account without telling me.

 

I have contacted the CRAs to advise and also Lowell to get them to produce a copy of the contract..

.explaining that it was a 12 month contract.

 

What do I do when they can't provide a copy of it?

They won't be able to provide it because it was a 12 month contract and I paid religiously throughout that agreement.

 

Can I report this to the ICO as it has completely trashed my credit file?

Any advice gratefully received....good or bad. :)

 

The second thing is this.

 

I became seriously ill in 2010 and it took some time for me to get some help with my mortgage and I incurred arrears.

 

The mortgage company took me to court

- does the calling up notice act as a default for the sake of dates?

- and they were ordered to negotiate with me.

 

No suspended possession order was placed on my account because the sheriff was really quite angry at the way I had been treated.

 

Forward to 2017 and more than half those arrears are now paid off and religiously they have been getting the mortgage payment every month.

 

On my credit file the mortgage company have noted that I am in default and am making late payments every single month.

 

As I have no influence over when those payments are made and am considered to be a "protected person" under the The Equality Act 2010, shouldn't they have been sorting this out so that it shows a true reflection that the problems incurred 6 years ago and the mortgage has been getting paid every single month, with additional to pay off the arrears every month?

 

Should they not also be showing that the arrears have been decreasing?

They are basing the arrears on what I pay now for my mortgage and not what I paid when they were incurred.

 

I was paying £700 a month in mortgage payments and now pay £250 with the latest rate increase.

 

They are saying I am more than 6 months in arrears on the payment now when the actual arrears were incurred when my mortgage payment was much higher.

 

Regarding the default.

Should that also fall off after 6 years as it's still there as well as late payment markers.

 

I think that the mortgage company should have changed the payment date as a reasonable adjustment so that my credit file reflected what was actually happening ie I was ill and incurred arrears

 

now although I am still seriously ill my payments are made every month and I have paid off more than half the arrears.

 

It looks like I am a really bad credit risk but it was a bad time in my life that I've now corrected. Surely this can't happen and it's not fair.

 

I look forward to getting some advice on what to do about this.

 

I have contacted all the CRAs but wondered if I should take it further.

 

Also FOS has not recognised this lack of making reasonable adjustments for my situation as a protected person.

 

Thanks a lot.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If your mortgage default is more than 6yrs old the whole account should not be showing at all so thus can't harm you score.

 

As for the voda default/debt

Write to the CEO and complain

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

 

Thanks for replying.

 

The arrears were incurred over 6 years ago and it appears that they didn't register a default.

They just keep reporting that my account is over 6 months in arrears.

They haven't even reported the arrangements to pay.

 

The sheriff said I should pay £25 over and above my CMP.

I have kept to that arrangement and have then entered into agreements with them to pay more in order that the arrears would be capitalised.

Every time this happens they transfer me back to another department and it all starts again.

 

Meantime they are not showing arrangements to pay or the fact that my CPM plus additional monies is being paid each month.

My credit file just shows 6 right the way back to the time the arrears occurred.

 

I don't think this accurately reflects the fact that I have paid religiously and, anyway, anything a court decides should be considered the actual arrangement to pay. That should be recorded on the CRAs as a ATP.

Am I right in thinking that?

 

I have been in touch with Lowells and will wait to see what they say.

If I don;t get a satisfactory response then I'll write a letter to the CEO.

I'll give them 14 days.

 

I am thinking that my arrears should only show for the time I was not paying CMP and thereafter arrangement to pay reflecting how they are reducing.

It just looks like I've done nothing and that's not accurate.

I'm really cross about this as it's just another thing they've done to make life incredibly difficult for me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the account should not be showing

go utilse this thread

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?483226-Natwest-Loan-and-new-default-registered-7-years-later...&p=5087010#post5087010

 

you were not under any legal remit to increase the payments set by the Sherriff

they were not allowed to increase payments

you should not have capitalised the arrears

simply leads to a greater debt because of added interest to the arrears

 

time to get reclaiming too

bet you've £1000's in penalty fees and stupid insurances

who's the fleecer?

 

start a new thread for the voda issue and i'll moved the posts to it.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I received an email today from Lowell saying that Vodafone has not produced the contract (because there never was one!) but despite that they cannot uphold my complaint. They have however said that they will remove defaults and information relating to them but they are failing to pay me compensation for their mistake. Oh, and it will take 50 days for the inaccurate information to be removed.

 

I have written back to them giving them 7 days to provide the contract after which time they will require to pay me compensation. As I know there is no contract because the contract didn't exist, they have no hope of producing it. If they say there is no evidence to suggest that this was an incorrect debt sold on...why are they removing all the information they have provided on my credit file for years apparently and why will it take them 50 days when they can do it immediately? They apply it quick enough.

 

They also said they bought the debts in good faith. Effectively they are taking debts from vodafone without even carrying out due diligence to see if these debts are even owed and then trashing people's credit files with no evidence to do so.

 

Shocking behaviour.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...