Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

RBS PPI complaint upheld - questions


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2265 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hello all - need a bit of advice before proceeding

 

This might seem more complex than it actually is, so please bear with me.

 

after a long haul,

I have had my PPI complaint upheld by the RBS. So far, so good.

 

They have made me an offer and then gone on to explain that I won't be getting some of it due to a succesful claim made against the PPI.

Then it gets a little complicated.

 

I have all my DSAR documentation,

and have been going through it prior and post claim.

 

The copy statments show insurance amounts hitting the account to cover the loan payments,

but they are sporadic and do not make sense

- eg. there are 9 insurance payments being credited to the account on the same day?

And I distinctly remember prior to these payments trying to make a claim on the insurance due to redundancy but the claim was delayed and not upheld.

 

I never received any notification from the bank or the insurance company that succesful payments were being made and the account went into arrears, being passed round various DCA's before being sent to CMS telford

 

Theirs and my offer calculations are nearly the same.

What is confusing me is that they have sent me copy statements going back to when I opened the account in 1995, listing every detail and transaction etc.

but then the statments stop in 2010.

The account has been in dispute since 2008 and has been statute barred since 2014.

 

My questions are as follows:

 

how do I find out if the account is still active?

there has been no activity on the account for at least 9 years

and I have had no "you owe us" letters for about 7 years

 

are CMS a part of the bank or a DCA?

 

I presume that any amount I receive will be offset against the statute barred debt?

when I cca'd and DSAR'd the bank they could provide no evidence of any credit agreement existing between us

 

I think i've explained it pretty much, so any comments/suggestions/questions are welcome

Link to post
Share on other sites

CMS telford were simply their internal DCA.

 

even though it might well be statute barred they IF they own the debt still can offset yes.

 

if they've sold the debt then no unless they buy it back.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks dx100uk

- I need to find out if they've sold the debt.

 

It just seems queer to me that 9 "insurance" payments were made into the account on the same day, totalling over 2500 despite me making an unsuccesful claim over a year earlier

- it was the unsuccesful claim that made the account go into arrears in the first place

 

haven't got my hopes up regarding actually receiving the money

Link to post
Share on other sites

so you sent an sar and none of this info was know by you till now?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
so you sent an sar and none of this info was know by you till now?

 

dx

 

yes, I did send in a SAR but the information supplied was of such quantity and so complex that it is only recently I have been making headway into preparing my claim

- I simply did not have time to devote to it due to work and family commitments,

it has taken me years of letters and advice from this forum to get anywhere really as they have been quite devious up until of late.

 

it's all over now and I have received my refund, less payments made to the insurance company to cover what they paid out

 

thanks to all - I will post in the successes thread when I get chance

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...