Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
    • Six months of conflict have also taken a heavy economic toll.View the full article
    • the Town and Country [advertisments ] Regulations 2007 are not easy to understand. Most Council planing officials don't so it's good that you found one who knows. Although he may not have been right if the rogues have not been "controlling" in the car park for that long. The time only starts when the ANPR signs go up, not how long the area has been used as a car park.   Sadly I have checked Highview out and they have been there since at least 2014 . I have looked at the BPA Code of Practice version 8 which covers 2023 and that states Re Consideration and Grace Periods 13.3 Where a parking location is one where a limited period of parking is permitted, or where drivers contract to park for a defined period and pay for that service in advance (Pay & Display), this would be considered as a parking event and a Grace Period of at least 10 minutes must be added to the end of a parking event before you issue a PCN. It then goes on to explain a bit more further down 13.5 You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is. 13.6 Neither a consideration period or a grace period are periods of free parking and there is no requirement for you to offer an additional allowance on top of a consideration or grace period. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________So you have  now only overstayed 5 minutes maximum since BPA quote a minimum of 10 minutes. And it may be that the Riverside does have a longer period perhaps because of the size of the car park? So it becomes even more incumbent on you to remember where the extra 5 minutes could be.  Were you travelling as a family with children or a disabled person where getting them in and out of the car would take longer. Was there difficulty finding a space, or having to queue to get out of the car park . Or anything else that could account for another 5 minutes  without having to claim the difference between the ANPR times and the actual times.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

NatWest "Get The App" Text Messages - Marketing or Not Marketing?


Good Sister
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2319 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello Caggers,

 

Hope I am posting in the right area

- I would appreciate some advice please on text messages I am receiving from NatWest regarding 'getting their mobile App'.

 

We are at a slatemate as I perceive them to be marketing texts,

which I am opted out of,

but NatWest are insistent that these are service texts

and is a communication which can be relevant to the maintenance of my account.

I would like some advice as to whether I should be persuing this further and if so, how.

 

I'll give you the back story, apologies if this is lengthy:

 

In November 2016,

after finally having had enough of the numerous text messages I was receiving from NatWest,

I made a formal complaint and asked for the messages to stop.

 

In December 2016,

NatWest sent their response saying that they did not uphold my complaint as I had been opted out of marketing information on all platforms since 2011 and that these messages were service texts which I agreed to receive as per their terms and conditions.

 

Whilst I was prepared to concede that messages informing me of how much I could put into my ISA account would be "relevant to the operation and maintenance of my account",

I did not feel that text messages asking me to sign up to a Rewards account for a monthly fee,

engaging in Twitter discussions and messages encouraging me to download their App (complete with web link)

were relevant and sought assistance from the Financial Ombudsman.

 

In February 2017,

the Financial Ombudsman upheld my complaint,

stating that some of the messages would be deemed marketing texts,

albeit they did not specify which messages they were or how many.

 

NatWest agreed and I was offered a small amount of compensation.

Though I was not entirely happy that they could not guarantee I would not receive any more text messages,

I accepted the findings and offered that my mobile number should be removed from their databases should I not be happy going forwards.

This resolution was agreed by all parties.

 

Since then,

I have had monthly text messages from NatWest relating to new/improved features on their mobile App,

all ending in "Get yours today at natwest.com/gettheapp".

I am quite 'old school' and don't need the App in order to do my banking and felt that these would still come under marketing texts.

 

Last month,

I sent a letter to NatWest's complaint department,

asking them to invoke the agreement to remove my mobile number from their databases, explaining why.

 

Today,

I have received a final response from NatWest.

They have agreed to remove my mobile number from their databases,

but do not uphold my overall complaint as

"the texts to which you refer to are service texts in that they are advising you of a service we provide that you could benefit from."

 

This statement, to me,

is contradictory as the whole point of marketing information is to advise people of a service that they could benefit from. Service information should be updates or changes to services they already use.

 

The clause in the terms and conditions that NatWest refer to is as follows:

1.9 Communications about your account

1.9.1 We will contact you with information relevant to the operation and maintenance of your

account by a variety of means including via online banking, mobile banking, email, text

message, post and/or telephone. If at any point in the future you change your contact

details you should tell us promptly about those changes.

 

I see nothing in the above about what would be deemed as "relevant to the operation and maintenance to my account."

By NatWest's own admission when the case went to the FOS that some of the text messages I was being sent would be deemed marketing, it would appear that there is a fine line between what is deemed marketing and what is deemed a service text.

 

I would love to take this up further,

even if it was just to get some clarification as to whether this was an acceptable type of service text,

but would like some thoughts as to whether I would have a case and how to go about it.

 

It seems such a shame that I have to put myself at risk of fraud as NatWest will no longer be able to reach me promptly, but this appears to be the only way I can stop the text messages.

 

Look forward to hearing from some of you in due course,

 

GS.

Any pearls of wisdom that I give on the CAG forums is based on previous experiences and knowledge I have gained from being on these forums.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well block the text number then simples!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My phone won't let me block numbers dx, would have done it ages ago if I could.

 

I get the whole delete/ignore thing, but it all seems so ambigious as to what is a service text and what is a marketing text. I get details of changes to the service via post, which I know I am obliged to receive and have no problems with.

 

I hate dealing with my phone at the best of times (have suffered from anxiety attacks in the not-so-distant past) and seeing a text message pop up from 'NatWest' can get me in a fluster and it actually gets me really worked-up to find out it is nothing important. NatWest are aware of my anxiety attacks for what it's worth.

 

Well, obviously, now they can't send me any more texts as they've deleted my number, but as I said, shame that I have had to resort to this in order for a quiet life :sad:

Any pearls of wisdom that I give on the CAG forums is based on previous experiences and knowledge I have gained from being on these forums.

Link to post
Share on other sites

All phones can

Which phone is it?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a 7-year-old Palm Pixi (yeah, I know!)

 

I've decided to look into changing the bank I use, as I think this is I would have to do as a long-term solution. Not going to rush into it though, I can pick up some literature from my local banks over the coming days/weeks and read through it and take it from there. In the meantime, I will let this issue lie.

 

It is good though to have a 'neutral' perspective on things and have someone who is not close to the issue cast an eye over it, so thank you to you and Mariner51 for your input and for letting me use the forum to have a mini-rant.

 

Until next time :wink:,

GS

Any pearls of wisdom that I give on the CAG forums is based on previous experiences and knowledge I have gained from being on these forums.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...