Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The incident was 03rd March 2024 - and that was the only letter that I have received from MET 15th April 2024 The charge I paid was at the Stansted Airport exit gate (No real relevance now - I thought this charge was for that!!).   Here is the content of email to them (Yes I know I said I was the driver !!!!) as said above -  I thought this charge was for that!! "Stansted Airport" Dear “To whom it may concern” My name is ??  PCN:  ?? Veh Reg: Date of Incident: 03rd March 2024 I have just received a parking charge final reminder letter, dated 10th April 2024 - for an overstay.  This is the first to my knowledge of any overstay. I am aware that I am out of the 28 days, I don’t mean to be rude, this feels like it is a scam My movements on this day in question are, I pulled into what looked like a service station on my way to pick my daughter and family up from Stansted airport. The reason for me pulling into this area was to use a toilet, so I found Starbucks, and when into there, after the above, I then purchased a coffee. After which I then continued with my journey to pick my daughter up. (however after I sent this email I remember that Starbucks was closed so I then I walked over to Macdonalds) There was no signs about parking or any tickets machines to explains about the parking rules. Once at Stansted, I entered and then paid on exit.  So Im not show where I overstayed my welcome.. With gratitude    
    • Just to enlarge on Dave's great rundown of your case under Penalty. In the oft quoted case often seen on PCNs,  viz PE v Beavis while to Judges said there was a case for claiming that £100 was a penalty, this was overruled in this case because PE had a legitimate interest in keeping the car park free for other motorists which outweighed the penalty. Here there is no legitimate interest since the premises were closed. Therefore the charge is a penalty and the case should be thrown out for that reason alone.   The Appeals dept need informing about what and what isn't a valid PCN. Dummies. You should also mention that you were unable to pay by Iphone as there was no internet connection and there was a long  queue to pay on a very busy day . There was no facility for us to pay from the time of our arrival only the time from when we paid at the machine so we felt that was a bit of a scam since we were not parked until we paid. On top of that we had two children to load and unload in the car which should be taken into account since Consideration periods and Grace periods are minimum time. If you weren't the driver and PoFA isn't compliant you are off scot free since only the driver is liable and they are saying it was you. 
    • Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x
    • Doubt the uneconomic write off would be registered, unless you agreed to accept write off settlement of the claim. It is just cosmetic damage. All that has happened, is that the car has been looked at and they realised the repair costs are going to exceed the value of the car. If the car is perfectly driveable with no upcoming normal work required to pass next MOT, your current Insurers will continue Insurance and you can accept an amount from third party Insurers to go towards you repairing the scratched bodywork.    
    • Peter McCormack says the huge investment by the twins will help Real Bedford build a new ground.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lowell Claimform - old Orange Mobile debt ***Claim Discontinued***


deptor
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2086 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello I wonder if someone could offer me some advice.

 

I received a letter from lowel Solicitors headed: Notice of Acting.

 

They asking me to pay an old Orange debt.

 

1- Should I ignore the letter? I haven't speak to them so far and always ignore them.

 

2- If there was no payment at all which date SB will be calculated from?

 

3- If the contract made in Scotland, SB referred to Scotland or the place you are living now?

 

Thanks in advance

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Statute barred will depend upon the jurisdiction in which the contract was made. If the contract was made in Scotland then the time will be five years from the date that the breach could reasonably have been discovered – in your case the date of the last missed payment.

 

Maybe you can give us a more details please

 

By the way, I haven't heard of "notice of acting" before but I dare say that someone else will come along and who will clarify.

 

However, I suspect that it may be some kind of procedural requirement if an action is being brought in Scotland. I say that simply because you have referred to Scotland so I am putting two and two together – but maybe I'm coming up with 5

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for quick reply.

 

This is for my friend.

 

1- Contract made early 2012 in Scotland.

 

2- No payment done from the begining (even first payment missed).

 

3- She was out of the contry for 10 months and then she backed to Birmingham and now she is in Birmingham.

 

4- Account defaulted on Oct 2012 based on credit report.

 

5- Received some letter from Lowell and some offer and discount that ignored.

 

6- Received a letter headed "pre-legal" assessment asking for full payment and stating that they are considering to refer this to the a solicitor.

 

7- Receive a letter from Lowell solicitor headed "Notice of Acting" and asking for full payment or monthly payment.

 

Nothing else in the letter regarding any legal action to be taken or threaten to do so.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Read the CONC rules relating to statute barred debts.

 

In respect of the Scottish contract, if there has been no payment since the last payment more than five years ago and if there has been no acknowledgement of the debt during that time then it should be statute barred. Under the CONC rules if you draw this to their attention then they are not allowed to take any further enforcement action. They should remit the file back to the original creditor who also should take no further action.

 

If anybody then goes on to take action after you've put them on notice then they are in breach of FCA rules

 

Please be aware that this simply means that the debt is unenforceable. It does not prevent the debt being entered onto a credit file and remaining there for six years.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so she has moved from the address that the contract was taken out at

and has never informed lowells where she is living now

but are getting all these phishing letters?

 

oh and Scottish sb rules are different to conc statement.

 

in Scotland once a debt reaches 5yrs of no payment or written signed acknowledgement of the debt from the supposed debtor

the debt is EXTINQUISHED ..DEAD GONE DOES NOT EXIST PARROT..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes,

When she backed to UK,

after a while they found her address and starting sending the letters.

 

She changed the address several times without any contact to Lowell,

but I don't know how they could trace her and sending the letters to her new address.

 

@BankFodder;

 

Thank you for the information. I will have a look at them and if I need more advice I will back to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

shes not made any payments so the debt is now extinguished under Scottish law - it does NOT exist.

 

these phishing letters need to be answered in ONE letter which is the Scottish SB letter detailed below in the link

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?387433-Statute-Barred-Letter-SCOTLAND-**Update-21st-April-2014**

 

this must be done as it will serve two purposes

the debt is dead

they will then have her correct address thus stopping a backdoor degree which they will go for as that's the point of the phishing letters

 

the days of ignoring DCA's, running away from debts are long gone.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for reply.

 

I just want to make sure that it is under Scottish Law.

 

It doesn't matter where are you from, or where do you live at the moment.

It is county based on the time you are signing the contract, where you are living (at that period she was living in Scotland), is it correct?

Link to post
Share on other sites

residence at time of signing.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

what is the supposed debt and who was the original 'creditor'

sorry this has not been asked

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh god

they 'll never win anyway if defended

but thats by and by now as its confirmed extinguished

 

the major thing you need to do is protect against a backdoor decree

that's reason for the letters.

they've got the address from your [her] credit file

 

so if no response is forthcoming, they'll know that they'll be pretty successful in filing a claim against the old address.

 

in Scotland, a degree doesn't expire for 20yrs so get that letter running.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I didn't catch a degree doesn't expire for 20 years .., what does degree means?

 

and can you explain what do you mean by backdoor decree?

 

We didn't acknowledge any debt, should we first ask for any evidence or we accept the liability and send the SB letter?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I didn't catch a degree doesn't expire for 20 years .., what does degree means?

 

and can you explain what do you mean by backdoor decree? even if the debt is sb'd if you don't inform them of your present address they can get a court judgement sent to her old address and she'll know nowt about it, , in Scotland that's called a decree.

We didn't acknowledge any debt, should we first ask for any evidence or we accept the liability and send the SB letter?

 

 

no need to ask for any evidence, its dead, extinguished..

send the sb letter I've already pointed too.

once a debt is sb'd you can't un bar it [reset sb] by sending any letter even if you sign it.

not even a judge/sheriff can unbar a 'SB debt'

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

and?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

and?

 

Hi

 

Thanks you for the follow up.

 

I sent them a prove it letter and I got the answer back today.

 

They said this not regulated by Consumer Credit Act 1974 and the supplier may not retained a copy of agreement and the agreement are deemed to be accepted when the seal on the SIM card is broken.

 

And they asked us to pay the balance within 30 days or a claim may be issued in the County court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

who said send a prove it letter??

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

who said send a prove it letter??

 

 

Legal Advisor.They said if the account already status barred nothing will happen while you don't acknowledge the contract.

 

We didn't acknowledge and asked for prove it and then we can sent the SB letter if needed. Is it wrong?

Link to post
Share on other sites

then go shoot them....!! utterly useless advise

 

I said send our Scottish statute barred letter.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry you are right.

However, you said nothing can change the SB.

So that made me relax if I send this letter without acknowledging nothing will change the SB.

Does this affect that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

ends the matter..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

what part of post 6 are you not understanding?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

then go shoot them....!! utterly useless advise

 

I said send our Scottish statute barred letter.

 

dx

 

I undrestood that, however the advisor said it is tricky.

As she moved to England and living in England for several years, then the England rule might be applied.

 

what part of post 6 are you not understanding?

 

Please don't get me wrong.

When you are in situtation like this, you try to move very carefully and avoid mistake.

We tried to seek advice from different sources and try to move step by step and carefully.

We appreciated all you support, help and advice you provided. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

already answered that in post 10......................

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...