Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided? I am now in a position to clear the debt either by lump sum or a few large installments - Is this something i should look into at this late stage? Thanks as always in advance
    • I have now received my SAR. It includes a great deal of information! Is there a time limit on how long account information is kept and/or can be provided to debtors? I have received many account statements which were not previously sent to me. I remember that the creditor should provide explanations of any acronyms and abbreviations that maybe used in the documents. Is this still the case? Also what, if any, are the regulations in regard to adding fees to a debt? Can fees be added to a debt after the court has approved a charge on a property. Perhaps due to the numerous owners of the debt, many payments I made were not properly recorded on the account, some were entered over a year after the payment was made! Following the Legal Charge, I paid every month until my payments were refused. I am trying to compute the over payments, but the addition of fees etc. is confusing me. Any comments and/or help would be appreciated.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Tupe Question


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2323 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All

 

I am about to be TUPE'd from a private company to the NHS.

I don't have a problem with this but my main concern is that as part of my current contract I have a company car as i travel between sites.

No one seems to be able to tell me what will happen regarding this as I cannot afford to buy my own car and I cannot get a loan as I am in my final year of an IVA.

I know the NHS don't have their own cars, but they do run a salary sacrifice scheme. Would I be provided with one under this?

I live over 50 miles away from work, so getting into work on public transport is not an option.

I've asked the question to several people, but no one can help me. Does anyone have any idea about this?

 

Thanks

Leese

Link to post
Share on other sites

You really will have to ask them, as different trusts run different schemes. They are certainly under no obligation to provide a car for you because you live a long distance from your workplace. Broadly speaking, few public sector employers provide cars these days, and only pay mileage allowances for work related travel. Some may, from time to time, offer salary sacrifice schemes to purchase a car - one local to me did so for hybrid purchases recently - but these often aren't continuous schemes, and only run for limited periods.

 

If your workplace has changed as a result of the TUPE, you may be able to get some limited assistance costs for travel to work, but not the cost of a car.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies. It doès form part of my contract and it's not just because i live some distance away. I have to travel between sites during business hours. I have asked several times and no one seems to know!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies. It doès form part of my contract and it's not just because i live some distance away. I have to travel between sites during business hours. I have asked several times and no one seems to know!

 

Well if it is definitely a contractual benefit - and be sure that it is, because the wording is important, and what people think is contractual often isn't - then the new employer will have to consider their options. It is certainly possible to change a contract on TUPE. People often think that TUPE protects their terms and conditions for ever and a day. That isn't true. TUPE protects terms at the point of the transfer. Immediately after that an employer can begin to change terms by claiming economic, technical or organisational grounds. Later than that, there is a grey area at which point the courts consider that the protections no longer really apply because too much time has passed, and nothing can be preserved for ever. But in the latter case, that's a court ruling, because there no hard guidance or law on it.

 

I suspect that you may find that the use of a company vehicle during working hours or for work purposes is one possible option. Broadly speaking the NHS doesn't have company cars, but it does have fleet vehicles. Providing you with one of these might be their escape clause, but that wouldn't mean you could use it for travel to and from work. The other option could, conceivably, be to either enforce a contractual change, or even to reorganize the service to make your role redundant and create one that does not have the same benefits. Their options would depend on many factors we don't know, like the service requirement, the exact contractual wording, their organisational approach.... I don't suppose you are in a union? Because this would have been the time to be in one...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks everyone. I am in a union but they are not very helpful! Thanks for all the replies. We do have a meeting about this coming up so hopefully I will get some answers! Thanks for the information it's been really useful

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...