Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What's the reason for not wanting a smart meter? Personally I'm saving a pile on a tariff only available with one. Today electricity is 17.17p/kWh. If the meter is truly past its certification date the supplier is obliged to replace it. If you refuse to allow this then eventually they'll get warrant and do so by force. Certified life varies between models and generations, some only 10 or 15 years, some older types as long as 40 years or maybe even more. Your meter should have its certified start date marked somewhere so if you doubt the supplier you can look up the certified life and cross check.
    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Faulty conservatory blinds


Paul1954
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2318 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi to all.

 

At the end of October we had some Perfect Fit double pleated blinds fitted by a local company. 7 small windows and 9 large.

 

A couple of weeks later I noticed one of the large ones was written on in biro along the top outside - lots of measurements! - which they took back and rectified.

 

We paid extra for these type because each pleat forms a diamond shaped pocket when viewed from the side. The idea being it traps air inside for insulation from heat and cold.

 

Last week I noticed that, on the outside, 5 of the 9 large blinds were coming away from the end fittings.

I also noticed that on the outside of ALL the large blinds the pleats were flat, as if pulled tight, along two thirds of their length, forming 'half a diamond'. On the inside they were all fine? The 7 small blinds are fine inside and out.

 

I took photos and went to show them.

They arranged to take the 5 blinds for repair.

I pointed out the pleats being flat outside but not inside and was told,

'That's how they all are. Mine are the same.'

 

Today, their fitter came and took the 5 back.

I pointed out the flat pleats.

I said they'd see for themselves when he got them to the shop.

I said not only were they inefficient at insulation because they were mostly flat, but they also looked terrible.

 

I copied this from a site explaining the purpose of these type of blinds -

 

Double pleated fabric - Honeycomb, cellular and double pleated are all names for blinds that have pockets of air.

These air pockets help to insulate your windows, keeping warm air in and cold air out.

 

They rang later to say they'll refit tomorrow.

No mention of them all being flat.

I won't be there tomorrow when they come, but my wife will.

 

I have no doubt they will try and fob her off saying there's nothing wrong with them.

 

We paid almost £1000 for them. Not cheap!

 

We didn't notice the faults earlier because when it gets dusk we close the blinds.

They're opened again when we get up so it's not something that we see every day.

 

So... do I write to them, rejecting the blinds unless they remedy the flat pleats problem.

When that gets me nowhere, do I write giving them 14 days to refund my money?

Then... the small claims court?

 

Thanks in advance for any advice you can give.

 

Paul

 

PS I'd be interested to know if anyone else has this problem, or if your blinds are 'Perfect' inside and out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well, it sounds as thoug the material isnt settling out evenly when the blinds are drawn down so some are stretching and others remaing tightly together.

Now I have seen the adverst as well and would say that they are not as described and not fit for purpose, the purpose ebing to create these air pockets not just stop people peering in. Blackout blinds would set you back about £150 for the same so it is obvious that you are apying for something more than that. I would be telling not to bother as they are clearly not up to scratch and you want a refund under your consumer rights.

I would say they fail on every part of the old requirements of the SOGA which has been replaced, they are not of mercantable quality ( they came apart) and not fit for purpose (honeycomb insulation doesnt work in normal use).

How did you pay for them? You may be eligible for a recharge via your debit card, the bank will be used to this but not necessarily helpful as they have a liability to refund whist it is being argued about. Let the company know in writing that you ar rejecting the goods as faulty and expect a refund. Us pen and paper,not email.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much for your clear and structured reply.

I will be highlighting your points to them.

I did pay by debit card so I'll look into that if need be.

Tomorrow I'll go see them and point all this out.

After that, depending on their response, I'll start putting a letter together.

Thanks once again.

Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...