Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Dear Sir/Madam, TFL case number: **** I would like to thank TFL for providing me the opportunity to explain my behaviour. I realised the stupidity of what I have done and wish to seek a resolution to this matter. I have no valid excuse for this action and I am extremely sorry and deeply regret my action. I hope you will accept my sincere apologies. Nothing can justify my action. I am aware that TFL are only able to operate if everyone pays their fare correctly and I feel so guilty about attempting to breach public trust. This has caused me sleepness nights and raised my anxieties. I have history of anxiety. This has been a hard lesson learnt. I have never been in trouble with the law in the past and I ensure that I won’t be in the future. I am and will be using my oyster card (PAYG). I would like to humbly appeal to TFL to allow me to settle this matter out of court and avoid going to prosecution given the adverse consequences it can have on me and my family. I am very concerned that prosecution for the first time and I would like to make restitution for my action. Having a criminal offense on my record will have detrimental consequences on me. I have always been a law abiding person and have no previous offences. I would really appreciate if I can be given the opportunity to pay for any unpaid fares plus any charges and/or administrative cost which have been incurred by TFL due to this incident. I am sincerely remorseful and ashamed of myself, and I fully appreciate the severity and stupidity of my transgressions. Again, I would like to offer my sincerest apologies. Yours Faithfully, My Name
    • the date is 19/04/24, so i have until 29/4/24 to reply? Yes, i will send my draft of my begging letter   
    • use the webform if it allows you to attach your evidential documents then do so but do that later depending upon who your bank is.... - but i suspect you will be referred to Mastercard. who is your bank? dx    
    • If i did it through the bank, they seem to have an online form. I wondered if this is the best way or to do a letter, add supporting documents and send them through the post, recorded delivery  ?
    • the process for attaining a charging order is the same no matter what it results in. interim first then latter they can go for a full charging order. at ICO stage its recorded the same on your deeds until a full CO is applied for and granted. however, as in your case, it resulted in simply a restriction k which cannot be converted into a full charging order so the entry remains stating ICO. smart cookies on your side IMHO now ...hope you succeed. dx  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Rentsmart/thinksmart & SHOOSMITHS - pc world Printer finance


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2323 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

Hopefully someone can give a bit advice,

unfortunately due to a mistake on my part i have ended up in arrears with a finance agreement through Thinksmart for a computer obtained at PCWorld.

 

Shoosmiths who suggest that they are solicitors acting on behalf of Thinksmart although i believe they are connected have been in touch and i have communicated back via email.

 

The debt is not huge at all but at this time of the year it can be difficult to pay back in on go.

 

I will post the email conversation below in the hope that someone could advise how best to respond to their final email:

 

Me to Shoosmiths:

Dear Shoosmiths,

With reference to the agreement number: ****** and your Ref:*********

I received a letter from you stating that i am in breach of agreement and in arrears by £162.45.

 

On checking with my bank i can see that the direct debit has indeed not been paid,

i will be contacting the bank in the interim to ascertain why this has happened.

 

I appreciate that i should have looked at correspondence from Rentsmart and that has been an error on my part thinking that it was marketing material.

 

In order to move forward with this and with consideration that the agreement is due to end soon anyway I can offer the following as a payment plan:

Friday 22nd December £60

Friday 26th January 2018 £100

Tuesday 27th February £100

 

This should ensure that any arrears and any due payments are finally covered.

Please can i request any communication be via this email address.

I look forward to your reply.

 

Shoosmiths reply (prior to this was request to confirm address):

Dear ........,

Thank you for your prompt response.

I must inform you that you have a further instalment falling due on 15 December 2017 in the sum of £34.15.

This will increase your arrears to £196.60.

 

My client have instructed me to terminate your account on 19 December 2017 if your arrears have not been cleared in full.

 

I can see your proposal below shows your first payment proposed to be paid on 22 December,

my client would be looking for a token payment before then to show a goodwill gesture if they were to agree not to terminate your account.

 

I would also need a reason as to why you are not in a position to clear your arrears in full before 19 December 2017

so that I can validate the hold on termination.

 

I look forward to receiving your response.

 

I have formally agreed to hold your termination,

I must inform you that your account is at risk of being terminated on 19 December 2017.

 

Kind regards

 

I'm not really in a position to make an additional payment now and my original offer was looking to include any upcoming payments,

i also believe the agreement is due to end soon anyway which i need to check on, any thoughts welcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

they are acting as a dca, not as a solicitors so in short they have no say in any matter.

However, that wont stop rentsmart from leaving late payment markers on your account and thus credit reference files.

 

What didnt the DD go through?

insufficient funds?

 

If it was the banks doing rather than no money available you can go after them to make good.

If dd cancelled you cant restart it so you will have to make payments by transfer to the same account.

 

What to do?

make sure you pay the £34.15 on time so they cant default but only show an arrears.

The pay off the arrears within the loan period and you will then be well out of it

Link to post
Share on other sites

who are stated as shoo's client

 

somethings not right here

 

are you in Scotland par chance?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

are this appears to be a business debt?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...