Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

yes car credit/ direct auto finance


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2295 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

some advice required please.

 

i used a ppi claim company to make various claims a couple of years ago, with some positive results,(apart from their charges).

 

i had a couple of cars through YCC pre 2005 and ended december 2007.

 

i claimed against YCC in 2011 but resulting in a letter from the claim company about 3yrs later saying the ombudsman rejected the claim as it was pre feb 2005.

 

would it take that long firstly,

and would it be worth making a claim against Direct auto finance???

Or have i been fobbed off by that claim company because they couldnt be bothered?

thanks in advance

 

also when i say the company couldnt be bothered,

i was being flippant.

 

as ive looked online many times (probably badly) and a lot of people had no joy or no reply from them.

 

i certainly never seen any successful claims being mentioned.

Link to post
Share on other sites

lots here to read on daf / yes car.

 

quite correct there were no guidelines in force then against PPI by creditors

however there were rules that the underwriters [insurance providers]

had to abide by

go hit them.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks DX for your reply..

I appreciate it..

 

Would I have to request sar etc from daf or a particular written letter?

 

I still have my last credit agreement with them.

 

Also would my first agreement be eligible for claim?

 

Thus no copy of record thanks

 

Sorry the agreement was with YCC but finance supplied by Daf thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

doesn't matter really you target is the insurance underwriters

use our search CAG box of the top red toolbar

 

DAF PPI

 

look out for a thread from adsuk

one which sticks in my mind

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again thanks for the reply DX.

 

What do i need to do first?

 

As previously i used a claims company so dont really know what to and in what order..

and theres so much info on here its a bit confusing.

 

Ive also looked for the thread you mentioned (user) but unable to find it.

sorry to be a pain but i do apprechiate the advice/help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well an sar is the 1st move yes.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

its easy peasy what lose upto 50% of any redress

when you can do it for free

with a little bit of simple work upon you behalf

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i know what you are saying is true as i know 1st hand how much it cost me using them anyway lesson learned.

only stumbled on this site by accident and theres so much information that ive confused myself a bit.

but i do apprechiate your responses thanx.

 

in the region of about 1500 in total so very keen to fathom out what i should do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you still got the agreement

and did the agreement [payments] run its natural course till settlement?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am using the SAR Template from the libary.

I have one account number but i had a couple of vehicles from them but no details.

 

would the request pull all info on my dealings with them if not what do i do??

 

my first vehicle agreement ran its course 36mths(no details thou).

the second ran 32mths of a 48mth agreement.

The car was returned and i paid approx 1036.32 in "insurances" and 80quid for them to collect the vehicle.

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh!

so I bet you got conned on doing a VS whereby you had to pay the full agreement

 

whereby they should have advise you could have done a VT and if you'd paid more than 50% you'd owe no more...ho ho..

 

don't put any agreement numbers on the sar.

 

have you moved since you used them to gain credit?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no i am at the same address..

..i am just looking at the agreement and just relised if i had gone the full 48mths of the agreement i would have paid 12,600.96 for a 4yr old car which would have been 8 yrs old at end of agreement...how STUPID was i

 

sorry misunderstood your question..

.i have been at 3 other addresses since then and have had credit at those addresses but i am back at my original address now...if that makes sense?

Link to post
Share on other sites

so you are now resident at the same address when these agreements taken out ?

 

did you VT the 2nd one?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes i am now at the address when agreement was taken out..i have the letter from direct auto financial services and says that i didnt owe anything for the car as i paid more the 50% but insurance amount required was 1300 less rebate 280..

Link to post
Share on other sites

cheeky fleecers

what was the insurances?

 

if you VT'd they cant charge a collection fee either!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ouch!

 

so £77.44PCM was all those?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so you have the agreement?

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

that's ok you still need to get the sar running anyway.

 

can yo scan up that agreement to one multipage pdf please

read upload

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...