Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

LLoyds PPI help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2320 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Have had a letter today from LLoyds Bank regarding my PPI complaint on TWO TSB cards held in the late 1990s.

 

They have rejected the mis-selling of PPI but have made a payment into my bank regarding the commission - a total of £500

 

However after the breakdown of each card it says total payment is £503 but after that there is a total of appendix i and ii where it says over £6,000 is the amount you will receive for both cards.

 

I dont know where that figure has come from but if they say its what I will receive do I pursue them for it or could they turn round say its a mistake and not pay it

Link to post
Share on other sites

why didn't you sar them first

what letter did you send?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

why didn't you sar them first

what letter did you send?

 

dx

 

this was a ppi complaint done online and over the phone

- they have sent a detailed letter as to why they say they did not mis-sold the PPI and work out e commission on the ppi on both cards totaling £500

but then they say you will receive £6000 for the two cards but have no idea where that has come from

- just wondering if they will say its a mistake and despite saying this is the amount you will get that they turn around and say im not getting it

Link to post
Share on other sites

its really stupid to start a PPI complaint without getting everything they hold first via an sar

else you haven't a scoobies if whatever they decide upon is correct.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes - it was not a good idea to begin this without an SAR first. I think that it shows that you still trust the bank - which is a serious mistake. Lloyds are a fundamentally dishonest bank and you need to look after yourself every step of the way.

 

Please will you upload the correspondence you have received from them in PDF format. Also, please tell us about your PPI complaint. Have you any written record of the details of your complaint?

You have been dealing with this on the phone - but I suppose that you haven't recorded your calls - even though you have been with us since 2008.

 

Please lay all all the information here and we will help you. If Lloyds have admitted that there was a commission issue then to my mind that pretty well admits a Plevin mis-selling .

 

Most importantly send them an SAR accompanied by a cheque - not a PO. Do this immediately. You will want to get hold of everything they have on you in any form relating to your account, loan and PPI. You also want everything they have on you relating to their PPI complaint investigation. You also want all telephone recordings.

 

Send your SAR to:

DSAR Unit Lloyds TSB

Customer Service recovery

Charlton Place

C46

Andover SP10 1RE

 

I can tell you that even some of Lloyds own staff don't know that Lloyds has this archive department.

 

You will need to monitor the cashing of the cheque. This archive department are not to be trusted either and they routinely breach the Data Protection Act by delaying SARs, not complying at all or making incomplete disclosures.

 

I suggest that you send the SAR and then call them in 14 days 0345 0707124 - to check that they have received the SAR and that it is being dealt with. Then call 14 days later to check its progress.

If there is the slightest delay then begin a complaint to the FOS and also the the ICO.

 

Of course, you will read our customer services guide before making any more calls and implement the advice there.

 

You need to act quickly because if they have given you their final response, you only have 6 months to complain to the FOS.

 

Please engage closely with this thread and don't disappear for long periods. Start taking this seriously.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...