Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, In my last post I mentioned I had received an email from SS who were asking me to hand over the keys to my mother’s flat so they could pass them to the Law firm who have been appointed court of protection to access, secure and insure my mother’s property.  Feeling this, all quickly getting out of my hands I emailed ss requesting proof of this. I HAVEN’T HEARD BACK FROM SS.  Yesterday, I received an email (with attached court of protection order) from the Law Firm confirming this was correct (please see below a copy of this).  After reading the court of protection order I do have some concerns about it:   (a)   I only found out yesterday, the Law firm had been appointed by the court back in January.  Up until now, I have not received any notification regarding this.  (b)   Section 2   - States I am estranged from my mother.  This is NOT CORRECT    The only reason I stepped back from my mother was to protect myself from the guy (groomer) who had befriended her & was very aggressive towards me & because of my mother’s dementia she had become aggressive also.  I constantly tried to warned SS about this guy's manipulative behaviour towards my mother and his increasing aggressiveness towards me (as mentioned in previous posts).  Each time I was ignored.  Instead, SS encouraged his involvement with my mother – including him in her care plans and mental health assessments.   I was literally pushed out because I feared him and my mother’s increasing aggression towards me. Up until I stepped back, I had always looked after my mother and since her admission to the care home, I visit regularly.   .(c)    Sections -  4, 5 and 7  I am struggling to understand these as I don’t have a legal background.  I was wondering if there is anyone who might be able to explain what they mean.  It’s been a horrendous situation where I had to walk away from my mother at her most vulnerable because of; ss (not helping), scammer and groomer. I have no legal background, nor experience in highly manipulative people or an understanding of how the SS system operates, finding myself isolated, scared and powerless to the point I haven’t collected my personal belongings and items for my mother’s room in the care home.  Sadly, the court has only had heard one version of this story SS’s, and based their decision on that. My mother’s situation and the experience I have gone through could happen to anyone who has a vulnerable parent.    If anyone any thoughts on this much appreciated.  Thank you. ______________________________________________________  (Below is the Court of Protection Order)  COURT OF PROTECTION                                                                                                                                                                                   No xxx  MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005 In the matter of Name xxx ORDER Made by  Depty District Judge At xxx Made on xxx Issued on 18 January 2024  WHEREAS  1.     xxx Solicitors, Address xxx  ("Applicant”) has applied for an order under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.  2.     The Court notes (my mother) is said to be estranged from all her three children and only one, (me) has been notified.  3.     (Me) was previously appointed as Atorney for Property and Affairs for (my mother).  The Exhibity NAJ at (date) refers to (me) and all replacement Attorneys are now officially standing down.  4.     Pursuant to Rule 9.10 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 and Practice Direction 9B the Applicant 2must seek to identify at least three persons who are likely to have an interest in being notified that an application has been issues.”  The children of (my mother), and any other appointed attorneys are likely to have an interest in the application, because of the nature of relationship to (my mother).  5.     The Court considers that the notification requirements are an important safeguard for the person in respect of whom an order is sought.  6.     The Court notes that it is said that the local authority no longer has access to (my mother’s) Property.  7.     Further information is required for the Court to determine the application.  IT IS ORDERED THAT  Within 28 days of the issue date this order, the Applicant shall file a form COP24 witness statement confirming that the other children of (my mother) and any replacement attorneys have been notified of the application and shall confirm their name, address, and date upon which those persons were notified.  If the Applicant wishes the Court to dispense with any further notification, they should file a COP9 and COP24 explaining, what steps (if any) have been taken to attempt notification and why notification should be dispensed with.   Pending the determination of the application to appoint a deputy for (my mother), the Applicant is authorised to take such steps as are proportionate and necessary to access, secure and insure the house and property of (my mother).   This order was made without a hearing and without notice.  Any person affected by this order may apply within 21 days of the date on which the order was served to have the order set aside or varied pursuant to Rule 13.4 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 (“the Rules”).  Such application must be made on Form COP9 and in accordance with Part 10 Rules.              
    • Unless I've got an incorrect copy of the relevant regulation: The PCN is only deemed to have arrived two days after dispatch "unless the contrary is proved" in which case date of delivery does matter (not just date of posting) and I would like clarification of the required standard of proof. It seems perhaps this hasn't been tested. Since post is now barcoded for the Post Office's own tracking purposes perhaps there is some way I can get that evidence from the Post Office...
    • I would say You should accept it - I HIGHLY doubt you will  be able to claim for letters at trial ans they’re offering you that, which is higher monetary value than interest.   Also they raise a good point, getting interest at anything above 4% is lucky these days, yes judges give it, but rarily above 4%   Also you might find depending on the judge  you don’t get some costs if you take it all the way over £7.40 when court woukdnt award letters costs and thus meaning their award would be less than evris offer which was made    Up to you though but the wait will be 3-4mo for a trial date at least
    • Hi Folks, Been 162 days! Just by way of update. Today I received a text from Opos Ltd so no doubt Capquest are renting the debt out to anybody who fancies a nibble. Safe to say I will not be responding.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

VCS ANPR PCN Claimform - overstay St Marys Gate, retail park, Sheffield **WON+COSTS**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1871 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Wow so happy to have found you CAG.

Fingers crossed I can beat this.

 

I am devastated,

treated myself and a friend to a theatre show tickets were about £7 each.

We are both pretty skint and I have now had a charge for £60-£100 quid!!!

 

Theatre Delicatessen (voluntary run theatre) had just moved to the address above when I went to see the show which was on the 24th October 2017.

 

Yesterday 6th Dec 2017 I received a letter asking me to pay £100, or £60 if I pay within 14 days of the date of the letter 29/11/17.

(Why have they taken so long to respond but yet I am pressured to pay so quickly just before Christmas and I have two small boys!:mad2:)

 

The building they have moved into is a retail outlet which used to be a Mothercare outlet.

Next door to staples.

The show was at 7:30pm.

I checked to see if there were any pay and display machines but did not see and other signs (tempted to go back to check where they are)

 

The letter shows registration recognition (but does not show the driver)

points out that I stayed 152 minutes and the maximum time of free parking is an hour.

 

I can understand why this is in place as I guess some people could take the mick and go into town

but I was visiting a building that the carpark was for

and the rest of the carpark was pretty empty except a few others which expect will also have received a charge.

 

I have rang the theatre who sypathetically said that I'm not the only one and that there is nothing they can do about.

She pointed out some other places I could park in future and that they have got signs inside the theatre.

These were not there when we visited as as it had just opened my friend and I had a good look around.

 

She said they are trying to sort something with the council which is a bit strange as the letter I have had says "Private land" and is from Vehicle control services who are accredited by the IPC.

I think I probably ought to call back and ask about this.

Could the council have employed VCS.

 

Please can anyone advise me what to to for the best.

Should I ignore?

Appeal?

Contact the company direct and explain the situation?

 

I sense they would not show goodwill.

Have I got a leg to stand on???

 

I look forward to hearing your wisdom I only have 6 days to pay the lesser price if you think I should.

 

Thank you,

Gemma:|

Link to post
Share on other sites

Others much more knowledgeable than me will be on in the morning.

 

Meanwhile, while paying £60 is better than paying £100, paying £0 is even better :wink:

 

You've already hinted that the signage was rubbish so that is immediately a stick to beat VCS with. I'm sure the regulars will agree with your suggestion of going back and photographing the signage.

 

In any case don't panic, help is on its way, this site is great for advice on how to beat the PPC sharks!

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you please complete this:

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?462118-Have-you-received-a-Parking-Ticket-(1-Viewing)-nbsp

 

and scan the NTK up to pdf please

read upload

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

we need to see te letter they sent you.

To make a claim against a motorist the parking co needs to follow certain steps prescribed by law and if this is the first you know about this then they havent used the conditions that allow them to claim anything.

 

However, that doesnt stop them from lying through their teeth

first advice is do not contact them as they will see that as a sign you are likely to pay up if they tell a few more lies or apply pressure by continuing to harass you.

There isnt a short term fix to this as they are more pernicious than head lice.

 

When we have seen their NTK (letter you got) we can tell you why it is faulty but that doesnt mean you contact them to tell them this, they know already but dont care, they are just after the money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry what is POFA?

 

POFA is (the ironically named) Protection of Freedoms Act 2012. Specifically Schedule 4 (when talking about Private Parking matters).

 

Click here

 

 

Also, have a look at this post for a list of all the usual abbreviations that you'll find in this area of the forum.

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This was my parking charge.

I can't see anything about the freedom act on the form.

 

I am still lost as to what to do next.

 

The charge goes up to £100 on Wednesday

 

I need to decide if to pay it or not can anyone shed any light please?

 

Dx100uk thank you so much for helping me out on Friday.

 

Would you still like me to complete the form you mentioned now I have uploaded the letter?

 

When I click on the link it takes me to the list of discussions I think. I'll try again now x

Link to post
Share on other sites

you don't need to abide by any stupid time limits as you ain't paying nowt anyway

its a speculative invoice

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?462118-Have-you-received-a-Parking-Ticket-(1-Viewing)-nbsp

 

complete this please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I found the form and I have answered the questions below. Thank you x

 

Its a parking charge notice

 

For tickets received through the post (Notice to Keeper) please answer the following questions.

 

1 Date of the infringement 24/10/17

2 Date on the NTK 29/11/17

3 Date received 6/12/17

 

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? NO

 

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes (cant see the driver)

 

6 Have you appealed? No

Have you had a response?

 

7 Who is the parking company? VCS

 

For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under.

There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure, please check here

 

IAS and they are acreddited by the IPC and registered with CCAS and have the UKAS logo on the letter

 

If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here no

 

Woohoo that sounds promising!

 

you don't need to abide by any stupid time limits as you ain't paying nowt anyway

its a speculative invoice

Link to post
Share on other sites

they are well and truly timed out for keeper liability but to be honest they dont care,

their notices arent up to scratch anyway and they are more than happy to lie through their teeth at a later stage

 

your tactics should now be making them waste their money and then hit them hard just once at the end of this exercise to let them know that you are no mug and arent going to be cowed by their abuse of process.

 

This will take a while

 

just hold your nerve and we will advise you when the time comes what to say.

 

In the maenwhile get some piccies of

the site and

its signage

as per every other thread,

entrance from public highway,

position of signs etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you!

I will get the pics and trust you

 

just to be clear,

you don't think I will be taken to court?

You think I should sit tight and wait for bailiff letter etc and then you will tell me how to respond?

 

It seems like they have taken ages to contact me have they broken any laws etc is that what you mean by timed out for keeper liability?

 

Should I be worried about the fact they are accredited?

 

I am worried that they will take me to court and the costs will end up being huge.

Sorry for the questions but what is exactly wrong with their invoice and how are you so sure I am safe?

 

You are amazing getting back to me so quickly and I will be certainly making a donation so long as I don't have to pay this chuffing charge : )

 

PS I haven't had time to read many other threads, poorly and very clingy baby last few days x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you!

I will get the pics and trust you

 

just to be clear,

you don't think I will be taken to court? no

You think I should sit tight and wait for bailiff letter etc and then you will tell me how to respond? what bailiff letter? who said that?

if you mean a letter from a DCA, they ARE NOT BAILIFFS, and are totally powerless.

 

It seems like they have taken ages to contact me have they broken any laws etc is that what you mean by timed out for keeper liability?

go read this again

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?462118-Have-you-received-a-Parking-Ticket-(1-Viewing)-nbsp

 

Should I be worried about the fact they are accredited? with whom..an old boys network?

 

I am worried that they will take me to court and the costs will end up being huge. nope costs are limited in small claim if they are that stupid..

Sorry for the questions but what is exactly wrong with their invoice and how are you so sure I am safe? - go read a few threads.

 

You are amazing getting back to me so quickly and I will be certainly making a donation so long as I don't have to pay this chuffing charge : )

 

PS I haven't had time to read many other threads, poorly and very clingy baby last few days x

 

 

you'll get there..

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you don't think I will be taken to court?

 

Even if you are, you have ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to worry about.

 

A single line defence statement will beat these clowns. They've timed out and there cannot be any keeper liability. It's as simple as that. But don't worry, if it get's as far as court, between us, we'll formulate far more than a one line defence!

 

There's so much wrong with their case, they've got no chance of winning as long as you don't give in to them.

 

You think I should sit tight and wait for bailiff letter etc and then you will tell me how to respond?

 

If won't be a bailiff letter, it'll be from their pet, toothless (so called) debt collectors. They have no power to do anything apart from write you scary letters.

 

It seems like they have taken ages to contact me have they broken any laws etc is that what you mean by timed out for keeper liability?

 

Under the (ironically named) Protection of Freedoms Act 2012, Schedule 4. They have a certain amount of time to contact the keeper. 14 days from the day after the parking event (for ANPR, which this is)

 

Should I be worried about the fact they are accredited?

 

I'm accredited too. Worried?

 

I am worried that they will take me to court and the costs will end up being huge.

 

If they take you to court, the costs will be huge. FOR THEM! As they'll have to pay your costs too. Win Win :razz:

 

Sorry for the questions but what is exactly wrong with their invoice and how are you so sure I am safe?

 

Experience :wink:

 

You are amazing getting back to me so quickly and I will be certainly making a donation so long as I don't have to pay this chuffing charge : )

 

Get that donation ready :lol:

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

nothing ignore

the start of many chain letters that make them change crayon colours soon

 

plenty of VCS or excel threads here to read

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I don't even need to look at the attachment.

 

NO!

 

 

Daft Recovery Pass can't do anything and can be completely ignored. They're just paid to write you scary letters in the hope that you'll fall for it and pay up.

 

I've got a drawer full of them :wink:

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

why say gulp?

 

explain yourself..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...