Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • did you submit your directions
    • They have defended the claim by saying that the job was of unsatisfactory standard and they had to call another carpenter to remedy. My husband has text messages about them losing the keys a second time and also an email. What do they hope to achieve??? Most importantly,  as far as I have seen online, now I need to wait for paperwork from the court, correct?
    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Can i charge Administration Charges for poor customer services


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2334 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I was wondering if I can charge a energy supplier 'administration charges' for their continual abysmal customer service?

 

I am aware that someone took TalkTalk to court for something similar, Marc Gander from CAG gave some advice on that one.

 

But can I actually charge by the full hour for having to continually phone, email write to this company?.

Link to post
Share on other sites

who

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The person who sued TalkTalk was able to establish actual losses and they sued on that basis.

 

The great injustice of the system is the although you have a contract with a phone company or an energy company and part of the contract is for them to provide a certain level of service, when that part of the contract breaks down no one ever seems to hold them to account unless the customer can prove actual losses. It is terribly unfair. When you deal with customer service people, the customer services staff get paid but you do it for free. It is absolutely unfair that the customer shouldn't get at least equivalent wage – but they don't.

 

You post a very open question and you've been asked above – who?

 

If you don't give more information then really it's pretty well the equivalent of asking us how long is a piece of string

Link to post
Share on other sites

The company In question is i Supply. I have now started a complaint to the ombudsman regarding the terrible way they run their business. They send out their own meter readers, then refuse to accept the meter reading. I have written, phoned, and emailed. I have, as per their request, attached photo evidence of the meter reading, but again and again they class this as 'unverified' or just don't bother with a response.

 

I am aware they must be reading my complaints as every time I contact them through emails I give an up to date reading. They then update their records, but STILL class the reading as unverified! Thus meaning they don't have to give me a statement, So although I was in excess off £100 in credit Sept 17, I simply just don't know where I stand now.

 

It's really really frustrating. BTW the electricity account I have with them runs smoothly, for the moment.

Edited by jmdnnlln
bad grammar
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

 

When did you last receive a bill? Which meter reading did they use - one of yours, one of their 'official' readings or their own estimate? How long have you been with them and has this been going on since you joined them?

 

I'll give you the heads-up now that in most people's experience, the Energy Ombudsman are as much use as a chocolate teapot - even if they rule in your favour, getting the energy supplier to act on it will take you back to square one.

 

I would be inclined to send them a SAR. It will cost you £10 and a lot of your time in sorting through the masses of paperwork once you get it, but may well be very helpful in sorting out what they are doing and how best to proceed. It should take 40 calendar days from receipt for them to send you everything they have on you, but you can send them a SAR just because you feel like it and not just because of an ongoing complaint. Probably as good a place to start as any if you are serious about pushing I-Supply for a resolution.

  • Haha 1

Any pearls of wisdom that I give on the CAG forums is based on previous experiences and knowledge I have gained from being on these forums.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...