Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Doc 04-19-2024 11-01-51-merged-compressed.pdf good morning.    9 pages attached.    thank you  UCM
    • Hi I was being supplied my ovo after unknowingly being swapped from SSE.  My issues began when we had a smart meter fitted and our bills almost doubled overnight - we at the time assumed we were just paying not enough until then and just continued to pay the excess bills each. Month.    I would from time to time contact ovo and get faced with a call centre on South Africa of the most rude agents who would just hang up after hours of wait and I could not even get an acknowledgement of an issue with my meter.  At one point we were not in the property for like 4 months and the bills were coming just as high!  It was at this point I was sure something is not right and ovo only care to send bailiffs and started threatening us with a pay as you go meter despite me taking out a 3.5k loan to pay of my outstanding balance.  Around 1600 each on both gas and electricity.  This is where its gets really bad -  the very same day they sent me out a new bill saying the money paid already was only to cover up until the November previous and because its now Feb we owe another 1k.   By that August this had risen to over 3k and I still couldn't get anyone to even acknowledge a fault let alone fix it.    In despair I tried to swap suppliers and to my surprise octopus accepted us because even tho the debt is owed we are trying deal with.  During our time with them the bill was coming only on my wife's name as I was responsible for other bills and she this one - now that we owe them 3k they have magically started adding my name as well as my wife's to the same debt to apply double pressure and its showing on my experiwn report now with a question mark and 2700 showing in grey -  This was my wife's debt which we dispute we owe yet the have now sent me letter with both our names on from oriel and past due credit debt agencies - is this illegal and how can I get them to take my. Name of this and leave on wife's name as its so unfair they give us a both a defualt for wife's debt which we dispute anyway.    In the end about 3 weeks ago I wrote an email to their ceo and rishi sunak and low and behold for the first time in our history with ovo someone who spoke English contacted us and said she will look into our claim.    I explained to her that we feel our meter is faulty and despite me contacting them using WhatsApp email and phone I still have not got anyone to acknowledge a fault even. And that I dispute I Owe anything as my son was in hospital for 3 months and we stayed with him so house was empty and still. They were sending us super sized bills more than when we started at home.  She promised to investigate and a few days later replied that she is sorry for the poor customer service and offered us £50 compensation - however she also. Mentioned that she's attached statements for us confirming the payment for 3k I made was only up until Nov and in Feb despite me pay 3.5k nearly it's correct for them to bill. Me. Another £900 the very same day and she did not agree our meter was faulty and therfore the debt stands and she will not be calling it bcak from past due credit.  During my time with my new supplier post ovo, octopus I requested tehy check my. Meters because I felt they were faulty and over charging me and I got excellent response asking me for further details which I supplied and I got a. Response bcak within days to say my meter was indeed faulty and octopus have now remotely repaired it.   I then contacted the energy ombudsman and explained my situation how she at ovo tried to fob me off and demand I apy money we don't feel we owe due to faulty equipment we reported but ovo had to process or mechanism to deal with it or lodge complaint even without having to cc their ceo and our pm. And now I feel sick to think both husband and wife will get a 6  year default for debt which have a validity of a questionable nature.    I explained all this to the energy ombudsman and they accepted my case and I explained to them that my new supplier found my fault which ovo refueed to accept - I've uploaded the email from new supplier to ombudsman showing we had a fault.    My. Question is is there anything I can upload in defence of my case to ombudsman before they decide outcome ina few weeks    All advice greatly appreciated not only would I like advice on how to clear this debt but also how I can pursue ovo for compensation and deterrence for the future.  Thansk 
    • Thanks for the reply dubai 50 - if the statute is 10 years it has long passed - if it is 15 years i havea few months left. i shall ignore until it gets serious  An update - - I sent the letter to the bank in Dubai ( I did get delivery confirmation from Royal Mail)   - I have moved to a new address ( this is the address i gave to the bank in dubai)  - IDR are continuing to send Letters to the old address, which leads me to believe they are not in contact with the bank at all. - i have not replied to any correspondence digital or hard as they are non threatening ( as of yet).        
    • Your topic title was altered last June 23 by the owner of this forum in the interests of the forum Anyway well done on your result and thank you for concluding your topic, title updated.   Andy   .
    • So what    Why ? Consent Order/ Confidentiality ? This would be be invaluable to followers of your topic.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Capital One PPI Rejected Claim


Baz1994
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2339 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I had an ongoing PPI Claim with Capital One (since October 2012) in which was rejected and referred to FOS.

 

This was again rejected on the basis that it was a non-advisable sale

and suitable for my circumstances even though I was in full-time employment,

with sufficient redundancy fund and sick-pay cover etc for the rather small amount outstanding of nearly £500 (my credit limit).

 

I did further argue the case, that I had not ticked any PPI agreement box on my postal application

but for some reason it was added at a later date (about 6 weeks) in which they advised I agreed to.

 

When I requested details regarding the later agreement,

the copy that they sent is not a very good one and quotes a completely different Capital One account number ?

 

complaint was then passed to the ombudsman, and I have today received their findings and they have also decided not to uphold my complaint.

 

Has anyone experienced the above with Capital One (or any other entity) / FOS / Ombudsman

and could possibly enlighten me regarding the Final Decision Acceptance / Rejection Form to sign.

 

What happens if I reject the decision ?

 

Will I still have an opportunity to provide any further reasons why I disagree or request any further details from Capital One ?

 

As this was one of my initial complaints and obviously know more now than then,

I did not proceed with a SAR as I still had all of my statements and copy of my application form.

 

They also state that they are happy to discuss with me about rejecting / accepting the decision but they cannot discuss the detail of the complaint ?

 

I have searched various forums regarding Capital One and believe they reject a majority of any claims presented

but also wondered am I wasting my time in pursuing the matter ?

 

Sorry for any silly questions but this is my first experience of this situation and would appreciate some clarity in the matter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sar time

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sar time

 

dx

 

Cheers dx - So its still not too late considering how far my complaint has gone ?

 

Should I forward a covering letter with my rejection form to FOS explaining that I am proceeding with the above ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

you don't know what it will throw up

 

yes tell the FOS

 

was this an ADJ or the Omds himself?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you don't know what it will throw up

 

yes tell the FOS

 

was this an ADJ or the Omds himself?

 

dx

 

Previously rejected by ADJ and now by Omds, both on the basis that it was non-advisable and I had later agreed to the PPI :x

Link to post
Share on other sites

I personally favour sending SAR requests to the registered office address....

 

Capital One (Europe) plc. Registered Office: Trent House, Station Street, Nottingham, NG2 3HX.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I personally favour sending SAR requests to the registered office address....

 

Capital One (Europe) plc. Registered Office: Trent House, Station Street, Nottingham, NG2 3HX.

 

Many thanks ims21 and will get one sorted asap.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Baz, I had a similar situation, which turned into an epic wrangle of wills, as some members here may remember and CapOne behaved disgracefully I have to tell you...

 

With regards the tick box on the PPI form, the tick on the form they provided to me via the SAR (Which you MUST do to get all the info you can), the tick was clearly in a different pen and hand looked like a different hand almost, a friend of mine looked it over too and she agreed it was not the same pen used to fill out the form.

 

The implications of this, which I pressed home to the FOS was that I believe the tick box on the form had be ticked at a later date than the form was completed, as in my case, my mum who's case it was, never remembered asking for PPI.

 

CapOne refused to pay out and even advised me I should contact the underwriters, which of course is nonsense, and twice they had an opportunity to resolve the situation and both times said 'after thorough investigation...' we feel there is no claim...

 

Of course this was all reconsidered when they finally realised I was ready (with the help of a few CAG members along the way nd I also had some support from the FOS legal team because CapOne had basically been playing games and the FOS advisor got the team involved to clear up some issues he was having with CapOne in my case) to go to court and argue about how they had been behaving...and suddenly they 'discovered' that in fact they owed my mom almost £10k...which they offered her 2 days or so before the court date...

 

The real irony was a couple of months later there was a phone call from CapOne, a woman saying she was from CapOne's customer service team and wanted to know about my experience in claiming PPI...I cracked up when she asked me if there was anything more they could have done, I said yes, you could have paid up when you had the opportunity instead of dragging it out for a year, and then almost fell of my chair laughing when she said would I recommend CapOne to others...I said no of course...when she asked me why, I said have you actually read the last 12 months correspondence on my case? She said no, I said goodbye...

 

So clearly, their idea of 'thorough' is not quite what I understand as thorough...

 

My advice, as im sure is the same you'll get from the senior members here, who's knowledge was invaluable to me, is basically to record everything you can, never speak on the phone or at least avoid where poss, send everything signed for mail, and question every little silly thing they try to fob you off with.

 

The one thing I finally found was that CapOne never really expected me to be prepared, I think it was a shock to them that I had kept everything, actually gone through a huuuuuge pile of paperwork from the SAR, gone through 12+ years of statements and paperwork and finally was prepared to let the court make the choice.

 

Though I warn you, they will most likely take it to the wire if they can but if youtruly feel you have a case, then I would pursue it without hesitation.

 

Best wishes...

 

mrbrooks

Link to post
Share on other sites

do I just remember that one!

 

great win!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I personally favour sending SARicon requests to the registered office address....

 

Capital Oneicon (Europe) plc. Registered Office: Trent House, Station Street, Nottingham, NG2 3HX.

 

+1 for this, I sent all my correspondence to their registered office, though they tried to claim it didn't arrive, they found it a couple weeks later when i produced the signature from the Royal Mail, then they told it had got lost internally and gone to the wrong dept...mmmm

 

Hi dx100uk, yeah it was epic for a time there, haha, both yourself and ims21 had some input into my first foray with CapOne...And I think we had some chats about Uncle Bryan too...who were hilarious...

 

Anyway baz, best of luck and hope you get a positive result...

 

mrbrooks

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Baz, I had a similar situation, which turned into an epic wrangle of wills, as some members here may remember and CapOne behaved disgracefully I have to tell you...

 

With regards the tick box on the PPI form, the tick on the form they provided to me via the SAR (Which you MUST do to get all the info you can), the tick was clearly in a different pen and hand looked like a different hand almost, a friend of mine looked it over too and she agreed it was not the same pen used to fill out the form.

 

The implications of this, which I pressed home to the FOS was that I believe the tick box on the form had be ticked at a later date than the form was completed, as in my case, my mum who's case it was, never remembered asking for PPI.

 

CapOne refused to pay out and even advised me I should contact the underwriters, which of course is nonsense, and twice they had an opportunity to resolve the situation and both times said 'after thorough investigation...' we feel there is no claim...

 

Of course this was all reconsidered when they finally realised I was ready (with the help of a few CAG members along the way nd I also had some support from the FOS legal team because CapOne had basically been playing games and the FOS advisor got the team involved to clear up some issues he was having with CapOne in my case) to go to court and argue about how they had been behaving...and suddenly they 'discovered' that in fact they owed my mom almost £10k...which they offered her 2 days or so before the court date...

 

The real irony was a couple of months later there was a phone call from CapOne, a woman saying she was from CapOne's customer service team and wanted to know about my experience in claiming PPI...I cracked up when she asked me if there was anything more they could have done, I said yes, you could have paid up when you had the opportunity instead of dragging it out for a year, and then almost fell of my chair laughing when she said would I recommend CapOne to others...I said no of course...when she asked me why, I said have you actually read the last 12 months correspondence on my case? She said no, I said goodbye...

 

So clearly, their idea of 'thorough' is not quite what I understand as thorough...

 

My advice, as im sure is the same you'll get from the senior members here, who's knowledge was invaluable to me, is basically to record everything you can, never speak on the phone or at least avoid where poss, send everything signed for mail, and question every little silly thing they try to fob you off with.

 

The one thing I finally found was that CapOne never really expected me to be prepared, I think it was a shock to them that I had kept everything, actually gone through a huuuuuge pile of paperwork from the SAR, gone through 12+ years of statements and paperwork and finally was prepared to let the court make the choice.

 

Though I warn you, they will most likely take it to the wire if they can but if youtruly feel you have a case, then I would pursue it without hesitation.

 

Best wishes...

 

mrbrooks

 

That is unbelievable and sounds about right with this lot.

 

This has been a bit trying for me this one but I do not want to give up ! I didn't take the SAR route with this one (silly me), as I had all statements and agreement details anyway. I now wish I had if I had known what was to come.

 

I'm still considering proceeding with one now, even though I have only until 10th June to respond to Ombudsman but still not satisfied with their findings and wondered what will happen if I reject it and complain about the service provided ?

 

Will I have to go to court or will I still have a chance in requesting further clarification of said details that I am not happy with ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

+1 for this, I sent all my correspondence to their registered office, though they tried to claim it didn't arrive, they found it a couple weeks later when i produced the signature from the Royal Mail, then they told it had got lost internally and gone to the wrong dept...mmmm

 

Hi dx100uk, yeah it was epic for a time there, haha, both yourself and ims21 had some input into my first foray with CapOne...And I think we had some chats about Uncle Bryan too...who were hilarious...

 

Anyway baz, best of luck and hope you get a positive result...

 

mrbrooks

 

And thank-you mrbrooks and hopefully I can utilise some experts on here to draw up some sort of response.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Baz, I would still get the SAR, I noticed dx asking if this was adjudicator of the Ombudsman's final decision, I am not highly knowledgeable about the process works but I do remember my own adjudicator telling me that in 'his' opinion I had a strong case but then I had to understand this did not mean it would go my and I would only know once the final adjudications and overall decision had been made. So if you reject the decision it could be important to know if you have any further mileage at the Ombudsman or not.

 

Another thing I remember is the a few folks told me you have no obligation to agree and that you are still entitled to take the matter to court if you so wish. However, again, I would check with some more knowledgeable folks around here as to what the implications of this choice may mean for you and what the current state of play is at court with such cases, ie are they favourable or not.

 

There was some stuff going on a while back about the FOS being an 'authority' (something like that) or not in a case and then another decision a bit later that said they were or weren't, then of course other stuff more recently about the FOS decisions and the courts, such as accepting the decision then attempting to go to court anyway. I am afraid I cant remember more than that, and have no doubt some of the team and CAG members will know what I'm babbling about and they can guide you on this as to where you should be looking to next and getting some background research reading done so you can make a better choice about what to do next.

 

The one thing I do know for certain, if you go ahead, you will need to be prepared, so get every scrap of info you can lay your mitts on, read as much as you can, ask where you need to and finally, if you make the statement to CapOne that you are going to court, then make sure you are actually prepared to do so, cos they may just call your bluff.

 

In my case they took my mom to court so I didnt have to initiate the court case but had to put a defence and a counterclaim in, so we were going anyway, my argument being that what they owed her in PPI would far outstrip what they claimed she owed them, so I prepared us to actually go to court, even booking time off work and organising transport etc, but CapOne presented the offer a couple of days before, infact Im sure they did it on something like a friday afternoon and we were due to be in court on the Mon or Tues of the following week.

 

Anyway like I say, be prepared and be ready as best you can be...

 

Best wishes...

 

mrbrooks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

I today received a letter from CAP One about making a new complaint about my PPI.

 

Previously rejected but now asking me to make a new type of complaint regarding commission.

 

My questions are, how do I complain if I have no evidence of commission paid for policy or on what grounds do I use now?

 

Can I now request evidence of commission's paid as part of my previous SAR some years ago?

 

They are requesting that I fill out an online complaint form or do so in writing.

 

Thanks for looking.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The whole point is simply to say that you were never informed that the person who advised you all who sold you the policy would receive commission.

 

That's all you need to do. It may as well also resubmit the original grounds on which you complained and in respect of which they rejected you. Things have moved on a great deal now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks BankFodder and will do so.

 

Just a little confused how we can complain about something without any proof.

 

Are they now obliged to disclose how much and provide evidence?

 

Or are we to take their word for it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Simply read up on plevin

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't think any creditor has rejected a pleevin claim when they instigated it

They already know its more than 50% else they wouldn't be writing...think about it...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...