Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
    • Here are 7 of our top tips to help you connect with young people who have left school or otherwise disengaged.View the full article
    • My defence was standard no paperwork:   1.The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2. Paragraph 1 is noted. The Defendant has had a contractual relationship with MBNA Limited in the past. The Defendant does not recognise the reference number provided by the claimant within its particulars and has sought verification from the claimant who is yet to comply with requests for further information. 3. Paragraph 2 is denied. The Defendant maintains that a default notice was never received. The Claimant is put to strict proof to that a default notice was issued by MBNA Limited and received by the Defendant. 4. Paragraph 3 is denied. The Defendant is unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served from either the Claimant or MBNA Limited. 5. On the 02/01/2023 the Defendant requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CCA 1974 Section 78 request. The claimant is yet to respond to this request. On the 19/05/2023 a CPR 31.14 request was sent to Kearns who is yet to respond. To date, 02/06/2023, no documentation has been received. The claimant remains in default of my section 78 request. 6. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of proof of assignment being sent/ agreement/ balance/ breach or termination requested by CPR 31.14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) show how the Defendant entered into an agreement; and (b) show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a default notice pursuant to Section 87(1) CCA1974 (c) show how the claimant has reached the amount claimed for; and (d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim; 7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 8. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974. 9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
    • Monika the first four pages of the Private parking section have at least 12 of our members who have also been caught out on this scam site. That's around one quarter of all our current complaints. Usually we might expect two current complaints for the same park within 4 pages.  So you are in good company and have done well in appealing to McDonalds in an effort to resolve the matter without having  paid such a bunch of rogues. Most people blindly pay up. Met . Starbucks and McDonalds  are well aware of the situation and seem unwilling to make it easier for motorists to avoid getting caught. For instance, instead of photographing you, if they were honest and wanted you  to continue using their services again, they would have said "Excuse me but if you are going to go to Mc donalds from here, it will cost you £100." But no they kett quiet and are now pursuing you for probably a lot more than £100 now. They also know thst  they cannot charge anything over the amount stated on the car park signs. Their claims for £160 or £170 are unlawful yet so many pay that to avoid going to Court. When the truth is that Met are unlikely to take them to Court since they know they will lose. The PCNs are issued on airport land which is covered by Byelaws so only the driver can be pursued, not the keeper. But they keep writing to you as they do not know who was driving unless you gave it away when you appealed. Even if they know you were driving they should still lose in Court for several reasons. The reason we ask you to fill out our questionnaire is to help you if MET do decide to take you to Court in the end. Each member who visited the park may well have different experiences while there which can help when filling out a Witness statement [we will help you with that if it comes to it.] if you have thrown away the original PCN  and other paperwork you obviously haven't got a jerbil or a guinea pig as their paper makes great litter boxes for them.🙂 You can send an SAR to them to get all the information Met have on you to date. Though if you have been to several sites already, you may have done that by now. In the meantime, you will be being bombarded by illiterate debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors all threatening you with ever increasing amounts as well as being hung drawn and quartered. Their letters can all be safely ignored. On the odd chance that you may get a Letter of Claim from them just come back to us and we will get you to send a snotty letter back to them so that they know you are not happy, don't care a fig for their threats and will see them off in Court if they finally have the guts to carry on. If you do have the original PCN could you please post it up, carefully removing your name. address and car registration number but including dates and times. If not just click on the SAR to take you to the form to send to Met.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Refused a basic bank account with Barclays and Co-op.


dn10zeus
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2341 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello, and thanks for reading this.

 

I am in a strange situation of trying to open a bank account, even a basic one.

 

At the moment I use a credit union and it works brilliantly.

 

Unfortunately,

they are restricted to a maximum of £20K.

 

In a few months

, I am due an inheritance and I need somewhere to put it.

 

Both the Co-op and Barclays have refused,

despite saying yes at first, and sending account details.

Today they have rescinded their offer.

 

Now there are some defaults on my credit file.

Two are current from Anglia Water, which have a note of dispute about them.

 

The others are old,

roughly 6 years and due to drop off the file next year.

There is no fraud alerts, no CCJ's, everything else is clean.

 

In the past 4 years I have 3 loans from my credit union and have never missed one payment on them. In fact I have a sizeable nest egg that I have saved up.

None of this was taken into account, only that I have defaults, and that they must be accurate because the creditor says so, and we all know they don't make mistakes.

 

do I challenge the defaults via the Information Commissioners Office.

Cabot tried to sue me over a 5 year old credit card which I fought them off with help from this site.

 

They have gone quiet, but I am wondering if it is worth suing them for filing an inaccurate and unproveable credit report.

 

The Co-op bank may offer me an account if I write and explain things.

I did that with Barclays, but to no avail. They treated me very shabbily with broken appointments, not informing me of refusing the account after they sent the details.

 

The alternative is a simple savings account to deposit this inheritance into.

I use the credit union for my everyday banking.

The account must accept cheques in $dollars, as it is from an American friend who has died and left me some money.

 

Any help will be greatly appreciated and I will return the favour for others who may be having trouble with debt collectors and banks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

is it just the defaults as the issue for them?, have they given their reasons. do those banks specify a number of defaults allowed

Have you tried any other banks that do a basic, eg Virgin

Link to post
Share on other sites

The account must accept cheques in $dollars, as it is from an American friend who has died and left me some money.

 

 

Can't you avoid that complication by asking the US Executors to remit the funds in Sterling? Obviously you'd agree to paying (deducting from the legacy) the charges they incur for that. If a cheque ask for it to drawn on a UK bank, but nowadays can't they send it by direct bank transfer?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, the banks involved wouldn't say why they refused the account.

What I suspect the reason is I was credit scored and didn't reach the required number to be offered an account. I don't want to keep applying because that damages your credit rating even further. This creates a catch 22 situation.

 

What does disturb me about how modern banks work, is their total reliance on a computer instead of somebody having the intelligence to consider the full picture. Barclays refused to do this, so they can go etc etc.

 

The Government forced basic bank accounts onto them because they were discriminating against certain sections of society, They still are. They would not even offer a basic account and see how I ran it for 6 months.

 

That is a possibility, but I don't know how much I will receive yet.

My main concern is that with the savings I have in the credit union, I will breach the £20K limit.

 

The alternative is to open another credit union account elsewhere to the current one, or open a savings account. Credit Unions do not accept cheques in any other currency other than sterling. They are getting better, but still do not offer the full access like a mainstream bank does.

 

My problems started when I lost my job due to ill health.

I live on benefits now and manage to save as I never go anywhere, I can't.

 

High Street banks don't want customers with savings, they want those who constantly borrow so they can fleece them in charges that would make a loan shark blush.

Edited by dx100uk
merge
Link to post
Share on other sites

If a cheque ask for it to drawn on a UK bank, but nowadays can't they send it by direct bank transfer?

it seems Virgin take non uk bank cheques on their basic, hence the suggestion. but, whether or not in non sterling?

as you say though, bank transfer, the execs covering the exchange to sterling?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, the banks involved wouldn't say why they refused the account. What I suspect the reason is I was credit scored and didn't reach the required number to be offered an account. I don't want to keep applying because that damages your credit rating even further. ....

from info, they should only do a credit check re identity as pure basic accounts don't offer any credit (no overdraft). there shouldnt be a 'credit score' applicable as such for such an account. either they accept defaults, unemployed, bankruptcy, etc outright or not

try virgin. one more prob won't make much difference.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you to all those who took time to reply. I shall try Virgin to see if I can get any joy there.

 

There are two current defaults on my file, both for the water bill, and both disputed. I am not bankrupt, have no CCJ's, but I am not on the electoral register as I have just moved house. My credit score is 540 according to Experian. It says poor, but I really don't care as I am not asking for credit in any shape or form, just a humble, little bank account with a debit card for the odd shop. Jeez, is that too much to ask for in the 21st century?

 

Why are high street banks being so picky when we know they are bankrupt without the taxpayers handouts?

Link to post
Share on other sites

just moved and not on the register, that may be it.

maybe if needs be phone up the council and put yourself on the (non public) registeras mentioned,

 

they say that they might do a credit check re identity and current address only (virgin say that on their site). a credit 'score' for a pure basic account should not be applicable. if a bank says they will accept defaults, then ones credit score is shot anyway.

try virgin (essential current ac), and be open when speaking to them initially. no point again getting the a/c then it later being taken back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Ford for your reply.

 

I was very upfront with Barclays bank and told them everything.

The manager assured me that I would be given a basic bank account, if nothing else.

 

They send me account log in details, and account and sort code twice and then rescinded it. Not nice.

 

I have asked them to compensate me for my time, broken appointments and breach of contract.

Their first offer was £25 to go into the account for failing to turn up at a meeting.

I've rejected this and asked for more.

 

I'm a better credit risk than my file suggests, having had 3 loans from the credit union totalling £5,000 and never missed a payment or paid a minute late. That is not reported though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would be given a basic bank account, if nothing else

thats another issue, some banks will try first for a 'normal' account first which prob will be scored (i think barclays, and nationwide for eg do that afaik). it then may get auto rejected after the full credit check.

maybe need to insist on just a basic, no overdraft ie no credit, no 'normal' a/c. as mentioned, a credit 'score'/risk is not applicable re such if a bank says they'll accept defaults, bankruptcy (virgin), as a credit score as a result will be shot anyway.

it seems though it may be re the current address issue having just moved, with maybe no docs/credit file (elect roll) showing your new address. they all require proof of id and associated address. i don't know. otherwise, something else may be amiss.

afaik, it seems coop and virgin pure basic a/c's are well ok with at least defaults, provided any id/address checks come back ok.

maybe you'll have to wait a bit to get on the roll first at your new address.

anyway, good luck with it.

if virgin fails, there are others, most majors do a basic a/c.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send the money to me, I'm sure i'll be able to find a way to send it to you.

 

H

44 years at the pointy end of the motor trade. :eek:

GARUDALINUX.ORG

Garuda Linux comes with a variety of desktop environments like KDE, GNOME, Cinnamon, XFCE, LXQt-kwin, Wayfire, Qtile, i3wm and Sway to choose from.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...