Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, Following the submission of my defense, last night I received an email from DCBL indicating that the claimant intends to proceed with the claim (I've attached a screenshot of the email for reference) along with the N180 directions questionnaire. I'm unsure how they obtained my email, but I suspect it was through the courts' form when I completed the Acknowledgment of Service. This email almost slipped my attention. I have also today received a letter from court to state they have received my defense.  It appears they are requesting an online telephone hearing with the court. Could you please advise me on the necessary steps I should take at this point? Thank you for your assistance. Letter-Email 25-04-24.pdf N180 - Directions questionnaire (Small Claims Track).pdf
    • Default Amount £9237.88, all this started in 2006 Admitted debt £9075.65 Weightmans added £1515.01 immediately they became involved, no explanation The Statement shows when Marlin bought debt in May 2011 £10439.25 Their statements, not received until the SAR, are based on this. Cabot deducted £1515.01on their statements in January 2019, again did not find this out until SAR. Weightmans added in  2007 after the CH1 etc was confirmed by the court £741.50, made up of Process server fees, Court Fee (they tried for bankruptcy), Solicitors fee and Land Registry fee. Unspecfied Legal costs were added by Marlin in March 2015, again I did not know this until statements received with SAR I had been paying monthly, without exception until December 2018. I am minded to take the property charge, CH1 amount ,deduct all my payments and the subsequent fees, and request/demand a refund on the final payment made? I consistently disputed Weightmans balances, but they never responded. I also told Mortimer Clarke/Cabot that I disputed their amounts.  
    • Just follow this link and have read of some threads so your familiar with the process https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/347310-legal-n180-directions-questionnaire-small-claims-track/#comment-5178739
    • Sorry,  I'm not familiar with terminology.  Direction questionnaire is what I've seen online as next step. Witness statement: I haven't gone that far, that's why I put the question marks.
    • 2. Is correct disregard 1. You must attend ad per the order 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

What are my rights to exit a contract early.


milnholm
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2286 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

 

It’s been a while since I was last on here.

 

I’m having a problem with BT.

If anyone recalls we were flooded out two years ago at Christmas.

We had to go and live in a hotel for six weeks and then into a holiday cottage for about nine months after that.

 

Once we moved into the cottage I got permission from the owner to have a phone line installed.

This was at the end of February.

 

BT gave me the usual run around.

Telling me alsorts of tall tales.

Like ‘the reason it’s taking so long (6 weeks past the date they said we have the phone installed) is because we have to get planning permission from the council to dig up the road to put a new cable in so we can connect you’.

 

I wrote an email to Gavin Patterson to complain.

He was very good.

He called me at 8 am the next morning to talk about it

and told me he had set a small team on the problem to get it sorted.

 

the cottage already had phone sockets installed from a few years previous and there was electricity present in the sockets.

it should have been as simple as going to the exchange and connecting the line.

it took over four months to get the phone on and another three weeks to get the BB working.

 

Eventually our house was ready for us to move back into.

I emailed the people who had been dealing with the complaint I’d already made.

This was to make sure I could get the line at home reconnected for when we moved back.

 

Everything seemed good.

Until we moved back and discovered that there was no phone line and no BB.

I went to a neighbors and called BT who told me it was going to cost £130 to put a new line in as there had, according to them, never been an active phone line at our house.

 

Even after explaining everything that had happened and assuring the person that there had indeed been an active BT line at the property she still insisted on putting a charge on my account for the £130.00.

I went back to the email and again it took months to get connected.

 

ever since then the BB has been very poor.

The connection frequently drops or more often the speed drops from 7Mbps to 128Kbps and if more than one person is online at a time the connection becomes frustratingly slow. back to the emails again.

 

Tests were run and run but they said there was nothing wrong.

I took screenshots from the laptop and all our families mobile phones and also photos of our TV,

we have Sky Q which has most of its content online,

the tv keeps displaying a message telling us that the internet connection is too poor or of such bad quality that online streaming can’t be used.

I had set the quality of the online videos to SD but this didn’t work.

 

I tested YouTube and set the quality to 144p and it played ok

i gradually increased the quality until it would start experiencing long and frequent periods of buffering.

I found out that if only one device was connected to the internet I could get a playback quality of 480p on YouTube to play with reasonable reliability.

 

Now I kept on at BT because there is clearly something wrong.

It got so bad that they just stopped returning my emails.

 

I’ve had enough and I’ve decided to switch providers but BT want me to pay £260.00 because I’m still in contract.

 

my question is

Can I reasonably assume that I’m entitled to leave with out penalty being applied because BT have not provide the services I’ve been paying for?

 

Thanks for your help.

Cheers

John

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes failure to provide the service they promised

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Do they not have to say what speed you will get first then dispute thats its slow, your cottage could be in the middle of nowhere. What speed did your supplier say you would get

 

They do, but then (and all Internet Service Providers are guilty of this) they cover their own backsides by selling it as *upto*. So that they're never actually guaranteeing the speed you're going to get. It could be that there's an issue with the phone line itself, in which case, switching away from BT won't solve your problem, as all other landline internet providers use the BT wires and BT Openreach, even though it might be their name on the box.

 

It might be worth having a word with your neighbours, finding out who they're with and what kind of speeds they get. If they're all getting better speeds than you, then I'd almost guarantee that the issue is with your wires, and the only way to get that sorted is via BT.

 

So unless you're in a 'cable area', I'm afraid that you're a bit stuck. You might move away from BT, but you'd still be using BT wires and (probably) BT exchange equipment, so speeds won't improve no matter which ISP you're with. The only difference may be that your new ISP might be able to push BT Openreach in to getting it sorted, but then, that's not a given either. :-(

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2017-11-23-new-ruling-forces-isps-to-make-their-broadband-speed-ads-more-accurate

 

can you PM me your postcode please

 

and obv your internet was ok before the flood too?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...