Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well tbh that’s good news and something she can find out for herself.  She has no intention if peace.  I’m going to ask the thread stays open a little longer.   It seems she had not learned that I am just not the one!!!!  plus I have received new medical info from my vet today.   To remain within agreement, I need to generally ask for advice re:  If new medical information for the pup became apparent now- post agreement signing, that added proof a second genetic disease (tested for in those initial tests in the first case but relayed incorrectly to me then ), does it give me grounds for asking a court to unseal the deed so I can pursue this new info….. if she persists in being a pain ? If generally speaking, a first case was a cardiac issue that can be argued as both genetic and congenital until a genetic test is done and then a second absolute genetic only disease was then discovered, is that deemed a new case or grounds for unsealing? Make sense ?   This disease is only ever genetic!!!!  Rather more damning and indisputable proof of genetic disease breeding with no screening yk prevent.   The vet report showing this was uploaded in the original N1 pack.  Somehow rekeyed as normal when I was called with the results.  A vet visit today shows they were not normal and every symptom he has had reported in all reports uploaded from day one are related to the disease. 
    • Hi Roberto, Read some of the other threads here about S Sixes - they all follow the same routine of threats, threats, then nothing. When you do this, you'll see how many have been in exactly the same situation as you are. Keep us updated as necessary .............
    • Nationwide's takeover of Virgin Money is hitting the headlines as thousands of customers protest that they will not get a vote on whether it should happen.View the full article
    • unrelated to the agreement then, could have come from Lowells filing cabinet (who lowells - they dont do that - oh yes they do!! just look at a few lowell paypal EU court claim threads) no name and address for time of take out either which they MUST contain. just like the rest of the agreement then..utter bogroll that proves nothing toward you ... slippery lowells as usual it's only a case management discussion on 26 April 2024 at 10:00am by WebEx. thats good simply refer to the responses you made on your 4a form response only. pleanty of SPC thread here to read before the 26th i suggest you read at least one a day. dx  
    • I think you have the supremacy of contract as it allows you to park in designated areas. I would argue that there being parking enforcement there clearly means its to be used as parking and as such you can use it under your lease. Only need to worry if they ever follow through with a letter of claim and a claimform though
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Shortfall in NI Contributions


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2344 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

Got a letter in today with a demand of £600 for a shortfall in my NI contributions from 2011 - 2015 which was 100% my fault. The letter basically said if it was not paid then they would pass it to a debt collectorlink3.gif although no date was given as to when it had to be settled.

 

Called HRMC today and spoke to a guy who was great and advised that i could set up a payment plan but had to transfer me to their debt section to arrange this.

 

Got through to a very arrogant [removed] woman who asked for the full amount to be paid today. I explained that due to the time of the year and my tax bill that was due (Not her fault i know) that i didnt have a spare £600 to pay in one.

 

She told me she could take £190 today and the rest would need to be paid by January. Told her that i could pay £100 per month but she said no this is not something that can be paid over that length of time.

 

She then told me to get a small loan or borrow the money. I told her i wouldnt be willing to do this. She then asked me why i had called her if i wasnt willing to make payment. I really had to just put the phone down on her as i didnt like the way i was being spoken to.

 

Anyway, It was my fault and not theirs and I have to pay it. I could pay it all today but that kind of drains me over christmas.

 

So my question is there any way that i could get them to accept a payment plan or do i just give in?

 

 

Ta

Edited by honeybee13
Possible racist remark removed
Link to post
Share on other sites

phone the person you first spoke to and tell them about the behaviour of the lady and say you want to make a complaint and who do you write to. Then explain about requiring 3 months to pay it off and say that you will not speak to that individual again so can they suggest an alternative. Try and record your conversations, even if it is with a dictaphone. Then if they are rude you can let them know afterwards that you have recorded them and will be sendinga copy of the tape in with your complaint.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and thanks for your reply.

 

I just bit the bullet and paid it off as i would be stressed having that over the christmas period. At least i can now be stressed at being skint over christmas unless the work come in again :|

 

When i called them it did say calls were recorded so i left feedback for the person who wasnt helpful. I honestly wasnt expecting to be spoken to like that so she caught me unaware.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have to be quite forceful when speaking to customers on the phone, otherwise they wouldn't get payments at all. Don't forget that this team deal only with people who owe tax, whatever the reason. Their aim is to get as many full payments as possible and knowing your tax history they have a good idea whether you can afford to pay or not. They have heard all the excuses and being a little short at Christmas won't wash with them, that just proves to them that you have the money. They see it as a priority debt regardless of where it sits in your list or priorities.

 

All calls to the debt team are recorded. The complaints team will listen to all your recent calls if you make a complaint.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have to be quite forceful when speaking to customers on the phone, otherwise they wouldn't get payments at all. Don't forget that this team deal only with people who owe tax, whatever the reason. Their aim is to get as many full payments as possible and knowing your tax history they have a good idea whether you can afford to pay or not. They have heard all the excuses and being a little short at Christmas won't wash with them, that just proves to them that you have the money. They see it as a priority debt regardless of where it sits in your list or priorities.

 

All calls to the debt team are recorded. The complaints team will listen to all your recent calls if you make a complaint.

 

It was class 2 National Insurance and she had all my tax information in front of her which shows all my tax returns are upto date as well as my tax bills. The bill that they sent had flagged up due to the new system where they now collect NI along with the tax. So i assumed that the class 2 was still being taken from my Direct debit but for some reason they stopped taking it. My fault for not noticing it but their fault for not collecting it for whatever reason, so when they send you a bill out of the blue i should been the one pSSd off but i owed it and paid it.

 

I appreciate that they do have to be forceful to get payments but i was phoning to arrange a payment plan but there is a difference between that and being arrogant and rude. No need for that when i was trying to pay.

 

I actually was struggling to also make her out, maybe there calls are sent to Nigeria !! Paid by bank transfer just incase !! Yep that was a dig !

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...