Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • depends what the fees are, typically nothing can be added once judgement is passed bar litigation costs. on document retention time limits etc at least 6yrs previous must be held though many hold complete info. as for acronyms and abbreviations ideally yes they should     
    • Still have to submit a statement either system....if they fail they can only give verbal because they failed to file and serve.
    • OP stated they had been arrested, but not charged (let alone convicted). They DON'T have a criminal record, but do have an entry on the PNC. That information stays on the PNC (Police National Computer) for life, but doesn't get released in a standard DBS. It only MIGHT get released for an Enhanced DBS (eDBS) check  ... but it would be incredibly unlikely. (The rational behind this is that eDBS's allow for 'information at Chief Officer of Police's discretion' ..... this covers the 2 'barring lists' and is also intended for the scenario where someone has multiple arrests or investigations, where safeguarding is a concern .... it was brought in after the Soham murders / Ian Huntley case, where the information known about the now-convicted child murderer may have prevented his employment in a school, had it been made available). So, for the sake of accuracy and completeness, arrests stay on the PNC for life, wont appear in a standard DBS, MIGHT appear in an eDBS, but in reality, would be the exception rather than the norm, and I can't see them being released  to a defense barrister. What then if the defence found out a different way, and brought it up in court?. Again, unlikely, but the important feature is that the judge would make sure they trod very carefully!. They MIGHT consider using it if there were other factors that allowed them to try to cast doubts as to the truthfulness of your evidence, but on its own : No way. Anyone MIGHT be arrested (if a seemingly plausible complaint been made against them)! The approach to take if it did come up is to be truthful. "Yes, I was arrested. It arose from a vexatious complaint. I wasn't charged, let alone convicted. That could happen to any one of us, if a vexatious complaint gets made" Far better that than lying, saying you'd never been arrested, and getting caught in a lie : that would ruin your credibility. I'm incredibly doubtful it will even come up, though.
    • we dont get N157 because its new OCMC but no court dont have evidence either.   Just seems a bit of a pointless wait but oh well
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Ringo Parking App - ** CANCELLED **


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2273 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Contravention

Parked or loading/unloading in a restricted street where waiting and loading/unloading restrictions are in force (code 02)

 

Parked the car in a suitable spot and used my trusty phone to book and pay for my ticket,

 

the app took the payment and allowed me to park from 16;25pm to 10;00am the next day.

 

At 1653pm I was given a ticket for the above contravention...why?

 

They took my money then 28 minutes of parking they gave me a ticket.

 

The app also tells you when you cannot park in a retricted zone by not taking your money and sends a flash message on screen telling you the zone is closed,

 

on this occassion it sent no such message hence why I parked in this zone.

Also there was no visable signage indicating the parking restrictions.

Photos are available.

 

I appealed but got told the ticket was issued correctly,

Yes it probably was but why take my money on the understanding I can park for 17.5hrs only to book for less than half hour parking...I feel I have been [problem]med.

 

I have now waited for the NTO and want to appeal on the grounds the app has a major flaw.

On the other hand they council rely on the effectiveness of the app but will not recognise there is a flaw with it.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your narrative doesn't make sense. The contravention is for parking on a SYL/DYL when there are also loading restrictions, yet Ringo is used for parking in a Pay & Display bay for which you have to enter a Ringo location number

 

I’m just giving you the information as it is the NTO states the contravention that I so said breached and my Ringo App receipt is for the same zone, pictures can be supplied to support my argument. Cheers

 

Were you overhanging the end of the bay?

 

No mate, again I have picture evidence both my own and one kindly taken by the traffic warden, cheers

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

my Ringo App receipt is for the same zone,

 

Again this doesn't make sense. Ringo receipts are for a location number, which applies to a particular set of parking bays. Not an entiire zone.

 

Were you in a parking bay or on a yellow line?

 

It would help if you posted the pcn , your reps, the councils rejection, photos and a Google street view link.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Google Street View Of Hotwells Road Bristol

 

I have saved the images as pdf which seems to work.

 

the first image show the Zone number on the machine

the second image shows the Ringo receipt correlating the zone number

the third image shows my car parked but if you look the signage that is in the google map no longer appears in my recent picture

the fourth is just a slightly different angle

002.pdf

004.pdf

003.pdf

001.pdf

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I responded to the PCN on the 13/09/2017

 

What I meant was, the PCN is barely legible. Was it like that when you got back to your car?

 

Sorry Michael, to be honest I cannot remember but I doubt it, Im a chef so its most probably greasy fingers that may have done that

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Michael, to be honest I cannot remember but I doubt it, Im a chef so its most probably greasy fingers that may have done that
OK.

 

With the NtO, you have now lost the discount, so it's a no brainer to make representations to that and if they reject go to adjudication. Even if the adjudicator refuses your appeal it will still cost the same as now - £70.

 

Lack of signage, you can show that there was a timeplate right where you parked which is now missing. Compare GSV:

https://goo.gl/maps/SZbPzw44cZo

with current photos. the only other timeplate is on the front of the ticket machine which you would have to walk into the road to read even assuming you knew it was there.

 

You walked to the ticket machine to get the Ringo location number and paid for the session, which Ringo accepted (phone screenshot) and without any timeplates to tell you differently, it was perfectly natural for you to assume that you had paid for parking that was valid for thewhole session.

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think there are two arguements here

 

one is did I park illegally which is yes,

but according to the Ringo app no I didn't,

 

I paid the money in good faith and in the understanding all was legal and above board.

 

Why did I not walk to the machine and check?

because the Ringo app finds your location without leaving the car needless to say I didn't check.

 

Bear in mind where the payment machine is and how busy Hotwells Road is there is always a vehicle parked in front of it obstructing any possible easy of viewing.

 

its the Ringo app that has caused this problem and will keep on causing it unless they address it...will they?

 

Thanks for the help Michael much appreciated.

 

Slightly off topic I have been paying a monthly contribution to this site for a number of years but my status has never changed, who can change it?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think there are two arguements here one is did I park illegally which is yes,

Do not admit to this in your reps

Slightly off topic I have been paying a monthly contribution to this site for a number of years but my status has never changed, who can change it?

The so-called 'status' is based purely on the number of posts you make. It's an irrelevant bit of nonsense, but your monthly donation is much appreciated.
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The so-called 'status' is based purely on the number of posts you make. It's an irrelevant bit of nonsense, but your monthly donation is much appreciated.

 

no worries just like to let you guys know I don't take your time and effort for granted and think this is a great site...keep up the good work

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...