Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Smart phone e-tickets


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2342 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This might be a stupid question.

 

I noticed transport companies like First Bus offer a discounted monthly fare for people who buy their ticket via a smartphone. The users then use their smartphone to show their ticket to the driver or place it on a reader.

 

The question is, what happens if the phone stops working due to a fault, they can't get the ticket to show on the phones screen or the battery powers runs out ?

 

You then can't use your ticket to get on a bus or if you are stopped by an inspector, you can't evidence having a ticket. Do people with these tickets stored on their phones print off a copy to keep with them to avoid any potential problems ? If had such a ticket, I would always keep a copy on paper just in case.

 

This would be the same with train fares etc.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the reason I've never risked using an app for bus or train tickets, too open to failure.

 

My other half is a frequent flyer and refuses point blank to use an app for his boarding card

- he always always prints one before he leaves home as he's seen too many issues at security etc with people whose phones fail at precisely the wrong moment.

 

At an airport it's presumably relatively easy to solve the problem (time permitting!) as you can just go back to check in and get a paper copy but I've no idea what would happen on a bus or train.

 

I suspect you'd either have to pay again and then ask for a refund or have to later provide proof that you did have a ticket or be fined as usual.

Maybe someone else has experienced this?

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. Yes i can see this being a problem.

 

Could you imagine waiting at a bus stop or being at a train station on the way to work and your phone fails, so you can't access your e-ticket ? What if being late for work causes problems in maintaining the job ? Companies can be quite strict these days and if staff are late a few times they can be subject to disciplinary action that could lead to dismissal.

 

Keeping a paper copy of an e-ticket on you in a bag or wallet might prove to be a life saver, if the transport operator accepts a paper copy. They might not, unless you also have other proof of identity, such as a photo driving licence.

 

The airline ticket scenario if you don't have time to spare, might prove very costly, if you can't show your e-ticket on your phone.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was recently tempted by a handbag which had a built in phone charger. Maybe all these travel companies who would like us to go to e-tickets should provide chargers/charging points?

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

At some point people will be able to pay for everything with a fingerprint or face recognition, without carrying any debit cards or travel tickets or mobile phones.

 

The only problem with face recognition as used on the new iphone is that it allows members of the same family with similar facial features to unlock the phone. There is a video online showing a Son being able to unlock his mothers phone.

 

In 10 years time people might not be carrying money or debit/credit cards.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting point, RMW.

 

I hadn't realised about luggage with phone chargers but recently saw one on a newspaper website that was built into a suitcase. Of course, you need to remember to charge up the charger. :madgrin:

 

HB

atm, its like those small portable battery packs with usb/connectors etc (which as you say need to be pre charged). when on the go just plug in the phone, ipad, pacemaker, etc.

yep, a cash/paperless techno world (with the obligatory ghosts in the machine), as has been envisaged

i'm going to keep using beans :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

In some ways : consider the (charged, working!) mobile device to be like a railcard.........

 

The (railcard discounted) purchased ticket is valid only with its railcard.

Without its valid railcard, a new ticket must be purchased.

 

Virgin Trains refer to e-tickets, but use ‘m-ticket’ for tickets on a mobile device (they use ‘e-ticket’ to mean a ticket delivered by email that the passenger can print themselves ......)

 

So, for an m-ticket, similarly to the railcard...... its validity depends on a working device.

 

https://www.virgintrains.co.uk/tickets/get-your-ticket

When using an m-ticket you'll need to:

 

Activate your m-ticket on the day of travel, from within the app, and show it to inspectors while on the train.

Ensure your mobile is charged – if you are unable to display your m-ticket, you’ll need to buy a new ticket at the full fare.

 

If people don’t want to buy railcard tickets because they are worried they won’t have the railcard with them, they don’t have to.

If people don’t want to buy m-tickets because they are worried they will not have a working device with them : they don’t have to.

 

There might be some people who are more likely to lose a paper ticket than not have a working device with them .....

Link to post
Share on other sites

atm, its like those small portable battery packs with usb/connectors etc (which as you say need to be pre charged). when on the go just plug in the phone, ipad, pacemaker, etc.

yep, a cash/paperless techno world (with the obligatory ghosts in the machine), as has been envisaged

i'm going to keep using beans :)

 

Could you imagine being in a Supermarket in say 20 years. Cash and payment cards are no longer in use. The fingerprint or face scanner is not working and there is no way of exchanging goods for money.

 

There always has to be a backup to technology.

 

I had this conversation with someone recently about Insurers computer systems. While they do have contingency centres that store an up to date copies of policy records, in the event that there is a major systems failure that lasted a week, if more than one office of the company was affected, it would be a problem. They might not be able to connect to any contingency system that quickly, as I don't think they test these regularly to make sure they can be brought into action within a set period of time. They might face being unable to service customers, until IT had worked their magic.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

There always has to be a backup to technology.

 

.

beans? :)

 

sounds corny, but its all going to pol pot though, as envisaged. art, literature, film, science, etc. such prescience. it will happen.

when my beans run out, thankfully i won't be around to be subject to 1984 robots in full.

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I use both m-tickets and paper tickets. The latter I use mostly for train tickets. I've managed to lose a few an had to pay for a replacement.

 

I've not had a problem yet with m-tickets.

 

A few years ago, I thought it would be easier to check in for a flight using the app. Whilst you just need to log in and check in, you still needed some sort of paper proof as your ticket. It turns out it's much less faff to print your ticket.

 

One thing our local bus company do (and so do London / TfL) is the ability to pay for fares via contactless cards. That makes it easier too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you can also use a photograph of the owner to do the same.

At some point people will be able to pay for everything with a fingerprint or face recognition, without carrying any debit cards or travel tickets or mobile phones.

 

The only problem with face recognition as used on the new iphone is that it allows members of the same family with similar facial features to unlock the phone. There is a video online showing a Son being able to unlock his mothers phone.

 

In 10 years time people might not be carrying money or debit/credit cards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you can also use a photograph of the owner to do the same.

 

That was tried on a TV show and did not work. It should not work according to Apple.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...