Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You could also ask about Jeremy Hunt and the multiple flats purchase he didn't declare properly. Or Lord Ashcroft about how much tax he saved while he was a non-dom. According to Private Eye, in Ashcroft's book he says Rayner avoided paying £3,500 to HMRC. Meanwhile he's estimated to have saved £112m by being a non-dom between 2000 and 2010.
    • Can you still log into your account and see if it will accept a defence ?
    • I see the poops are still trying to deflect from their own criminality and and abuses by whinging on about raynors buying her council house - now about election registration - anyone who owns a flat or house understands that you dont give up your and your childrens home just because of a new relationship and while we are on about that ..   lets start with When is jenrick being revisited for both lockdown abuses and self admitted (claims estate is his main home - not the property in his electorate or his london property) 'possible (lol) electoral registration abuses as he claimed he was at his estate 'main home' away from both London and his electoral 'home'  - much of which paid for by the taxpayer     Cabinet Minister Robert Jenrick 'breaks lockdown rules twice' by going to 'second home' - Mirror Online WWW.MIRROR.CO.UK Key Cabinet Minister Robert Jenrick drove 150 miles to his 'second home' after urging the nation to remain in their homes in a bid to...   ... perhaps follow with more self admitted lobbying while in a potion where they shouldn't “A few of us in parliament have lobbied the government – and with the help of the Treasury select committee, the chancellor has listened,” John Baron wrote.   Tory MP faces lobbying questions over Treasury committee role | Investing | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Co-owner of investment management firm called for ‘urgent’ post-Brexit changes to City rules at committee meetings     About time labour got in the game and started pressing for these self admitted/bragged Tory abuses were properly investigates.
    • No I didn't I got the dates mixed up.   
    • Sorry about that, TJ. The person who posted it specifically said it was free access. Here's another version of the FT article. https://archive.is/KYrPa
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Arrow Global CCA reply and change of agency letters.


thetroublemaker
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2190 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there all.

 

I have a question regarding my account.

 

I had a Virgin Money Account which I was paying off interest only for, for a significant time and one i had PPI on.

 

I was paying minimum payment for some time which meant interest and charges only on it.

 

My business failed earlier this year and I am only now coming out the other side with a salary again.

 

The account has been sold to IDEM and noodle gives the following information.

 

Idem Capital Securities

£ 4,471

22/09/2014 Default

Name nnnnn

Address nnnnnnn

Date of birth nnnnnnn

Account type Credit Card

Account number ******6888 0

Account start date 09/05/2008

Opening balance £ 4,471

Regular payment £ £ 1

Repayment frequency Monthly

Date of default 28/02/2014

Default balance £ 4,471

 

I am now being contacted by Westcot about it daily and in letters.

 

I would like some advice please.

 

1 - It seems I can still approach Virgin/MBNA about PPI and charges on this card as I believe i have a claim that may be valid.

Do I contact westcot and advise them that I will be contacting them or not?

 

2 - What should be my next plan?

I have no issue paying this debt off but i see all this stuff about CCA requests and SAR requests etc a

nd I am not sure what I should do, I

 

 

can ring them up and offer £200 a month not an issue.

 

3 - Do they have any legal right for me to disclose my financial details to them as in income and outgoings

- i can see from other threads that IDEM seem to think that they are in their rights to ask lots however I don't know what westcot will want from me.

 

Thanks in advance!

Link to post
Share on other sites

the PPI reclaim would be against MBNA yes

 

if you don't have all the statements

then send MBNA an SAR.

 

as for wetcloths

 

send them a CCA request.

 

so you took this out in 2008?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

 

Thankyou for the reply.

 

I will be completely honest with you I do not remember if I took it out in 2008 or otherwise - it may have been earlier although 2008 is quite conceivable as a start date.

 

If i can confirm, i send MBNA/Virgin a SAR and I should get back a complete statement/set of statements/info from them.

 

I can then ask Westcot for the copy of the CCA they (should) have on file from me by writing to their registered office address.

 

I have already spoken to them on the phone

 

should i now stop doing that and simply communicate by letter with them?

 

Should i call them and advise of the situation that I am querying this with MBNA now and will be in touch?

 

Should i write to them regards this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

stay off the phone writing only.

 

send them a CCA request.

 

if the credit report says 05/08 then they are usually correct.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

I sent a CCA request to Arrow regards an account on the 4th November.

 

On the 8th November I received a change of agency letter, which i have attached stating all enquiries are to be directed to Moorcroft.

 

Then yesterday I received a letter which seems to be a standard CCA response from arrow, including the phrase "we do not accept we are the creditor" which seems a bit odd as I am assuming they have bought the debt.

 

What is also of note is that in their reply the date of my incoming letter is wrong - it was dated the 4th not the 10th as they state. AND they sent me someone elses letter as well by mistake with the same dates on it - pertaining to a overdraft. Surely this is against data protection rules? Also what should i do about this letter. I can do one of 3 things i think

 

1 - nothing

2 - post the letter on with a covering note explaining it was sent to me in error

3 contact arrow from a withheld number and only give them details of the letter they sent wrongly not mine so they can resend it.

 

Either way at the moment the letter says that all collection activity will be suspended pending provision of the documents. Should I do anything else (i.e. send a SAR to MBNA) or should I wait and see if/until I get the CCA back first. The cynical me says to do the latter as if they havent got that I wouldnt want to rush to provide a signature......

 

Thanks in advance.

 

I am trying to post the letters but i dont have 10 posts. Will come and add reply after I have 10 with Photos on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

wait for if/when they ever fulfil the CCA response. SAR the OC if you have concerns about the debt or need to reclaim

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't

 

1 spam the forum to get to 10 posts

 

2.you don't need 10 posts

use upload to PDF

 

I've taken down your pix and redacted your name from both pictures for you

and reposted them on post 1 as a PDF.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've merged an old thread about this debt here too for you

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

that's letter you got is the std arrows reply to a CCA request.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

that's letter you got is the std arrows reply to a CCA request.

 

And should be reported as it is misleading

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

I got the following letter today as a response from my CCA request of 6 months ago.

 

I assume this means that moorcroft will continue to pursue this debt although there is no paperwork available.

 

Is there anything I should do?

 

Should I write to them officially disputing this now or just ignore them or? ????

cca response.pdf

Edited by thetroublemaker
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ignore

But not a letter of/before claim

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No compliant response means you can safely ignore and not pay. They cannot legally enforce the debt through court, although they can keep an accurate record on your credit file and ask you to pay.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...