Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If the legendary dx could offer his wisdom it would be greatly appreciated 
    • Hi there Manager for our soccer sixes team moved overseas mid season and we struggled for numbers so we told the ref about 5 weeks prior to seasons end that we would see out these games then be done and he told us he’d ’pass the message on to the relevant people’. Heard nothing, then 3 days prior to the new season beginning we were given our fixture for that weekend. Told the guy over text we had pulled out and the ref should’ve passed a message on but we were told sufficient notice wasn’t given and it needed to be in writing. I argued it’s not our fault the ref didn’t do as he said but we were countered by the T&Cs.    now being chased for what was £608 kindly reduced to £476 to pay off remainder of the season. Been sent a letter in the post from their accountancy team and told needs to be paid by Friday.   seen a lot of the other threads saying we can literally just ignore everything but im concerned about debt collections and credit score being harmed. Can anyone confirm if this all works/what we should do?   thanks
    • Hi,   I have given an official police witness statement for the prosecution in an upcoming criminal court case, and I am very anxious about what might happen.  Specifically regarding being cross-examined.  My statement is very short, and only a couple of paragraphs long, regarding a conversation I had with one of the victims.  I have tried to research online about what information about me the defence barrister might be able to find and use to discredit me.  I have by no means have a shady past but, I am concerned about what private information might be brought up, and as this is a case that will be in the national press as it is in the public interest.  The two preliminary hearings were reported in the papers.   I have tried to research  online what information the opposition can seek, but it is all very complicated.  I believe that they can legally access public records, but I'm not sure what information public records hold.  Can they access my medical records, educational history, HMRC, and Department for Work and Pensions? (I am a self employed sole trader).  I was arrested once, and this was unfortunately instigated by the victim in this case, so could well be of interest to them.  It resulted in no further action, however I have only discovered this week that that, in fact, this means I have a criminal record, and will be so until I am 100 (no chance)! This has really annoyed me to say the least, especially since I asked him afterwards why he rang the police and he said 'for a laugh'.  So I have started to look into applying for it to be deleted, but again, if anyone has any advice on this I would be appreciative. At the moment, my name isn't on the confirmed list to give evidence, but the detective I have been dealing with has said it is 'likely'. The names of the victims in this case will not be allowed to be reported, are witnesses fair game for the press? I really need no know how deep they can delve in to my life so I am prepared if my character gets assassinated in front of the nation. I really wish I'd never agreed to this.   Many thanks
    • A belated thanks dx. Yes I may take your advice regarding StepChange. I am finding that I am telling them (on behalf of my Son) the true balances outstanding? They never seem to check properly in which worries me. If I was to take on myself is there another way of dealing with various debts? I have already submitted other IRL complaints on his behalf. Today I have received a further response from Quidie T/A Fernovo confirming that they will waiver all interest paid.
    • Good evening  Case hearing this Friday 26/04. looking to have all my prep/papers ready.    just checking in to get update on my last post , ( the t&c’s attached). No name or address on them as per #49   thank you UCM  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Student loan-course not finished


Rosie8
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2350 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

I am asking for advice on behalf of a friend who lives in England as an EU national.

 

Question one:

She had been receiving student loan for a business course which she could not finish.

 

There were all sorts of problems with communication between her and the school and she still is trying to sort out something to be able to finish the second and final year of the course.

Not much chance for that as I see it.

 

In the meantime she got a letter that informed her that she owed 32k in student loan.

She went very much downhill with both her mental and physical health and is extremely stressed about this debt.

 

Should she be?

She has never earned more than minimum wage and with her health problems now she could rely on benefits for some time.

 

Question two:

If she is not likely to be chased by bailiffs for the student loan could that change in the event of Brexit happening?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rosie, tell your friend that the worst thing to do is allow her mental health to affect their normal judgement. It is the voice in the head that is telling them things, which are simply wrong or the worst outcome that could happen. The worst outcome can happen when people bury their head in the sand and simply give up, not bothering to communicate with organisations.

 

The education establishment should have a health and wellbeing or welfare team that deals with students that get into such difficulties. I doubt your friend is the only person that has attended the school, that has has had similar problems. They need to contact the school themselves or provide a letter of authority for someone to act on their behalf to make the first contact. Then an appointment can be set up with the person that handles these situations.

 

Once the first step is made, then the other issues, such as finishing the course and the loan debt can be dealt with. Your friend should get advice, which will be to keep in contact with loan provider so they understand the situation. They might want information, which can be provided, stopping any debt being chased, if the level of earnings has not reached the threshold. If your friend can update all those that need to know, then they won't have this stressfull situation to deal with.

 

The student loan debts are not subject to any enforcement action, until a long time has passed by. Take action now to update student loan provider and school, so this problem is removed. If your friend takes no action, the debt will get passed to debt collectors at some point and if your friend ignores them, they they may try to gain a CCJ against your friend. Once they get the CCJ, then there are options such as bailiffs, but it is unlikely unless it is a private business school that uses bailiffs.

 

In regard to Brexit changing debt collection agreements between UK and EU countries, I very much diubt there will be any change. In theory most debts can be chased across borders, as the loan agreement won't restrict enforcement of the debt to UK Courts. If another country allows a UK debt to be considered by their courts, then the debt could follow your friend. But it is very unlikely, as they have enough problem with debt enforcement against UK residents.

 

Advice is take action as advised and don't ignore everything hoping it goes away.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much for the in-depth advice!

 

My friend will follow your advice I am sure.She will be massively relieved by the news.

She already pays a solicitor to get to the bottom of the issues with the school with the little money she has.But school even ignores solicitor letters.

 

You mentioned private business school and possible bailiff action.Is the debt not with HMRC if letter comes from them?I can only check later with her whether the school is private or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if she doesn't earn the money

then they cant take their slice

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks.That's great news for her but also she needs to know that bailiffs would not harrass her either.She is in a situation where she cannot put up with more stress and family finding out about it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

where are you getting the crap about bailiffs from?

 

they only ever become involved AFTER someone has been to court and lost 'whatever' and fail to pay 'whatever'

 

nothing remotely ever to do with student loan nor any consumer debt.

 

not getting confused with Debt Collection Agencies are you?

they ARE NOT BAILIFFS AND ARE TOTALLY POWERLESS

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok.I get it.

 

Probably she mistakes the two.

 

Not good to get involved without knowing all details.

 

She told me she was visited by bailiffs for Provident debt which was already dealt with by an arrangement.

 

This is why she gets 'paranoid'.

 

It must have been debt collectors on that occasion too.

 

Never mind she gets freaked out from them too.

 

Thanks for info.

 

I will educate her on this subject.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if she paying that provi debt then tell her to stop

that money is going directly into the doorsteppers pocket

same with any other debts she paying to DCA's

 

lets have a list please

or can you get her to come up on CAG be the better idea

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No Solicitors should be taking any little money she has. If she has a legal dispute with the college, there are probably other dispute resolutions available that don't require a Solicitors.

 

If people stop speaking to organisations to engage with them to resolve issues, then matters have a tendency to become worse and more complicated to resolve.

 

If there is a student union or other student help function at the college, they might be worth contacting for information.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes,you are right.I am afraid hers is a very complex story.

 

She needs my support now and I will come back here for more good advice.

 

She pays £20/week for debt arrangement.

 

Could she kick that up and pay less?

Link to post
Share on other sites

on what?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry,

don't have specifics tonight.

 

She pays a debt arrangement company who contacted her creditors and she agreed to pay £20/week to cover all her debts and has been paying it for almost a year now.

 

Non priority ones and one tax fine payment in the package.

 

But Provident and HMRC keeps sending letters and I just wrote an email for her to ask why she is still bothered by them.

 

I wrote the email to the debt arrangement company.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hope its not a fee paying DMP company

 

if it is DUMP THEM.

 

tax one is priority debt and should be paid directly to HMRC?

the rest not I bet.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...