Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
    • Here are 7 of our top tips to help you connect with young people who have left school or otherwise disengaged.View the full article
    • My defence was standard no paperwork:   1.The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2. Paragraph 1 is noted. The Defendant has had a contractual relationship with MBNA Limited in the past. The Defendant does not recognise the reference number provided by the claimant within its particulars and has sought verification from the claimant who is yet to comply with requests for further information. 3. Paragraph 2 is denied. The Defendant maintains that a default notice was never received. The Claimant is put to strict proof to that a default notice was issued by MBNA Limited and received by the Defendant. 4. Paragraph 3 is denied. The Defendant is unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served from either the Claimant or MBNA Limited. 5. On the 02/01/2023 the Defendant requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CCA 1974 Section 78 request. The claimant is yet to respond to this request. On the 19/05/2023 a CPR 31.14 request was sent to Kearns who is yet to respond. To date, 02/06/2023, no documentation has been received. The claimant remains in default of my section 78 request. 6. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of proof of assignment being sent/ agreement/ balance/ breach or termination requested by CPR 31.14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) show how the Defendant entered into an agreement; and (b) show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a default notice pursuant to Section 87(1) CCA1974 (c) show how the claimant has reached the amount claimed for; and (d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim; 7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 8. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974. 9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
    • Monika the first four pages of the Private parking section have at least 12 of our members who have also been caught out on this scam site. That's around one quarter of all our current complaints. Usually we might expect two current complaints for the same park within 4 pages.  So you are in good company and have done well in appealing to McDonalds in an effort to resolve the matter without having  paid such a bunch of rogues. Most people blindly pay up. Met . Starbucks and McDonalds  are well aware of the situation and seem unwilling to make it easier for motorists to avoid getting caught. For instance, instead of photographing you, if they were honest and wanted you  to continue using their services again, they would have said "Excuse me but if you are going to go to Mc donalds from here, it will cost you £100." But no they kett quiet and are now pursuing you for probably a lot more than £100 now. They also know thst  they cannot charge anything over the amount stated on the car park signs. Their claims for £160 or £170 are unlawful yet so many pay that to avoid going to Court. When the truth is that Met are unlikely to take them to Court since they know they will lose. The PCNs are issued on airport land which is covered by Byelaws so only the driver can be pursued, not the keeper. But they keep writing to you as they do not know who was driving unless you gave it away when you appealed. Even if they know you were driving they should still lose in Court for several reasons. The reason we ask you to fill out our questionnaire is to help you if MET do decide to take you to Court in the end. Each member who visited the park may well have different experiences while there which can help when filling out a Witness statement [we will help you with that if it comes to it.] if you have thrown away the original PCN  and other paperwork you obviously haven't got a jerbil or a guinea pig as their paper makes great litter boxes for them.🙂 You can send an SAR to them to get all the information Met have on you to date. Though if you have been to several sites already, you may have done that by now. In the meantime, you will be being bombarded by illiterate debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors all threatening you with ever increasing amounts as well as being hung drawn and quartered. Their letters can all be safely ignored. On the odd chance that you may get a Letter of Claim from them just come back to us and we will get you to send a snotty letter back to them so that they know you are not happy, don't care a fig for their threats and will see them off in Court if they finally have the guts to carry on. If you do have the original PCN could you please post it up, carefully removing your name. address and car registration number but including dates and times. If not just click on the SAR to take you to the form to send to Met.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

JC international/Moriarty claimform - old Talk Talk landline/broadband debt***Claim Dismissed with Costs***


u6cah
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2242 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I have been helping my partner with a claim that has come through from Moriarty Law.

 

The circumstances of this is a county claim form came and was defended.

Defence being that she was unaware of the debt or even the contract.

 

Her ex-husband was controlling and dealt with all of the services to the house.

She left the property 01/01/2012 and moved away and everything was dealt with by a solicitor.

 

She has spoken with Moriarty Law a number of occasions asking for a copy of the agreement and when this was signed as she had no knowledge of it.

A formal request was sent as the defence was submitted with no reply.

 

Allocation questionnaire has been filled in and returned, Moriarty law have now sent a copy of their defence.

 

Hearing is scheduled for 8th Dec

 

In order for us to help you we require the following information:-

 

Name of the Claimant JC International Acquisition

 

Date of issue – 15th June 2017

 

What is the claim for –

1.The claimants claim is for the balance due under an agreement with talk talk limited dated 06/2011 which was assigned to the claimant on 03/2014 and notice of which was given to the defendant on the 03/2014 and which is now all due and payable:

 

2.the defendant agreed to pay monthly instalments under account number XXXX but has failed to do so and the claimant claims the sum of £160.

 

3.The claim also claims interest thereon pursuant to S.69 county court act 1984 limited to one year to the date hearof at the rate of 8% per annum amouinting to £20

 

What is the value of the claim? £250

 

Is the claim for - Landline and Broadband

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? after

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. - assigned

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? No

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? No

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? No

 

Why did you cease payments? Was not aware of the account, split up 01/01/2012 and didn't even realise the phone account was under my name.

What was the date of your last payment? unsure

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? Wasn't aware of the debt.

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor

and make any attempt to enter into a debt management planicon? No communication with Talk Talk

 

What you need to do now: would like some assistance in preparing defence and also witness statement ready for court

Link to post
Share on other sites

they haven't sent you their defence

they've sent their witness statement

 

I have removed all the scans you've sent

 

you need to scan it all up to ONE multipage PDF

read UPLOAD.

 

you need to do your witness statement and send it by 14 days prior to the hearing

 

there are lots of JC/moriarty talk talk claim threads here

many already have witness statements you can base yours on.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dx

 

Thanks for the assistance. I have now uploaded all the files into a single PDF.

 

I have been looking at other witness statements, most of the threads I have found up till now have not actually gone this far....

 

Will do a bit more reading and look at drafting something up.

 

I do have a current question, which is relating to proof of her living elsewhere for a year before this debt was accrued. Will this add to the defence or will it simply muddy the argument that the agreement was simply not known about?

Witness statement ML.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

you've already filed your defence

no harm in adding it to the WS

and the fraud bit too

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

8. Subject to the above, should the alleged amount claimed include an early termination charge(s) amounting to the total balance of the remaining contract, OFCOM guidance clearly states that any Early Termination Charge, that is made up of the entire balance of the remaining contract, is unlikely to be fair, as it fails to take into account the fact that the provider no longer has to provide and pay for their service.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Please find enclosed a draft WS. any advice or input would be greatly received.

 

In the

Claim No.....

BETWEEN

JC International Acquisition LLC

-and-

(Defendant)

 

--------------------------------------------------------

WITNESS STATEMENT OF (Defendant)

---------------------------------------------------------

1. I make this statement in support of my defence to the claim above and include relevant evidence and exhibits.

 

2. This claim is in respect to termination fees under a contract to supply Land and Mobile Line Telephone Services to (Address)

 

3. The witness statement supplied by the claimant advises the contract was entered into on 13th June 2011 and was terminated on the 24th January 2013 with a balance of £166.75

 

4. I do not recognise any of the account details and have no knowledge of this account.

 

5. I do not recall having received a Notice of Assignment, as stated by the Claimant and despite my request for a copy of said document, under CPR 31.14, the Claimant has failed to provide me with such to date.

 

Therefore the Claimant is to provide strict proof to:

 

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into a Agreement/ Contract; and

(b) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and

© show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim;

 

6. While I resided at (the address) I was married, and it was my husband at the time that dealt with all services and bills.

 

7. I left the matrimonial home on the 01/01/2012 and was unable to access anything after this time

 

8. Without the original agreement I cannot advise if this agreement has been taken out fraudulently.

 

9. Pages 1 – 6 showing recreated monthly bills, the bills dated 20/12/2012 and 20/01/2013 appear to show the exact same itemised call lists but with different dates which would be incredibly unlikely and these may have been generated with no relevance to the actual account.

 

10 Subject to the above, should the alleged amount claimed include an early termination charge(s) amounting to the total balance of the remaining contract, OFCOM guidance clearly states that any Early Termination Charge, that is made up of the entire balance of the remaining contract, is unlikely to be fair, as it fails to take into account the fact that the provider no longer has to provide and pay for their service.

11 By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed, or any relief.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Witness statement has now been submitted, along with a copy of the original CPR request.

 

Going to now start to prepare for the court date.

 

One question, am I allowed to attend with my partner who is the defendant? would it be possible to help represent her or would she lead? Witnesses was put down as 1 on the directions questionnaire?

 

Is it a case of speak when spoken to?

 

Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can attend and support...but cant speak directly to the Judge.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy,

 

Yes some googling has brought up the 'Mckenzie friend'. How do we inform the court I would also like to attend? Should it have been something that would have been part of the witness statement?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your attending informally...you dont need permission..your not acting as a Mckenzie friend

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you wish to act either as a Mckenzie friend or Lay Person you will have to seek the courts approval.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi Guys,

 

I wanted to update you guys with the following:

 

Attended court this morning, the Judge looked through the information and asked about the bills that had been submitted and offered the following judgement (I will try and remember most of it)

 

He believed there was a contract in place and that a contract was entered into

He believed the debt was correctly assigned to the company, and that the company was able to bring about the action.

He believed the assignment letters and pre-action letters had been sent and received by the defendant.

 

The claimant relied on terms of contract, the contract has not been provided so therefore it was fatal to the claim.

 

The 3 months bills that had been submitted did not show how the debt had been incurred,

he would have needed to see a full statement of account for him to rule if it was correct or not and the claimant had not provided enough information.

 

He dismissed the OFCOM termination statement as he couldn't see any termination fees on any of the documents provided.

Pretty much dismissed everything else in the witness statement.

 

Dismissed claim with costs awarded to us.

 

So would like to thank you guys for your help

and also the information provided previously from the threads I had read while submitting the defence.

 

I will certainly be donating and hope it helps other people.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent result...well done u6cah.....

 

Thread title amended to reflect the out come

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Hi Sorry for the delay in updating the thread. It was Stafford.

 

So the claimant was told to pay the costs within 14 days, this hasn't happened. I have read on another thread that we would need to request a General Order pursuant to CPR 44.3.1 & 2a

 

How would you go about doing this?

 

Thanks in advance, I have yet to figure it out?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you sent the Solicitor a bill of costs ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy,

 

Sorry snow got in the way so didn't get chance to reply till now...

 

No haven't sent the solicitor a bill of costs, would it be to the solicitor or claimant? Is this simply a letter outlining what the costs are for along with a copy of the order?

 

The only bills of costs I have seen have been claimant ones that are very detailed and used for cost negotiation?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well until you request your costs amount ....how can they pay you ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

So would a simple letter with the breakdown and details of where to send the payment, with a copy of the judges decision be enough as a starting point?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes...informal initial approach ...test the water...to the Solicitor.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...