Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No, do the section 75 chargeback to your credit card provider.
    • See what dx thinks but it seems to me that sending a photo of your own pass isn't relevant to what happened. Let's wait and see what he says. HB
    • 1st letter image.pdf1st letter 2nd page.pdf
    • Many thanks for the replies and advice!   I what to send this email to the Starbucks CEO and the area manager. Your thoughts would be appreciated.   [email protected] [email protected]   Re: MET Parking PNC at your Starbucks Southgate site   Dear Ms Rayner, / Dear Heather Christie,   I have received a Notice to Keeper regarding a Parking Charge Notice of £100 for the driver parking in the Southgate Park Car Park, otherwise infamously known as the Stanstead Starbucks/McDonalds car park(s).   Issued by: MET Parking Services Ltd Parking Charge Notice Number: XXXXXXXXX Vehicle Registration Number: XXXX XXX Date of Contravention: XX.XX.XXXX Time: XX:XX - XX:XX   After a little research it apears that the driver is not alone in being caught in what is commonly described as a scam, and has featured in the national press and on the mainstream television.   It is a shame that the reputation of Starbucks is being tarnished by this, with your customers leaving the lowest possible reviews on Trustpilot and Trip Advisor at this location, and to be associated with what on the face of it appears to be a doubious and predatory car park management company.   In this instance, during the early hours of the morning the driver required a coffee and parked up outside Starbucks with the intention of purchasing one from yourselves. Unfortunately, you were closed so the driver walked to McDonalds next door and ordered a coffee, and for this I have received the Notice to Keeper.   It is claimed that the car park is two separate car parks (Starbucks/McDonalds). However, there is no barrier or road markings to identity a boundary, and the signage in the car park(s) and outside your property is ambiguous, as such the terms would most likely be deemed unfair and unenforcable under the Consumer Rights Act 2015.   I understand that Starbucks-Euro Garages neither operate or benefit from the charges imposed by MET Parking. However, MET Parking is your client.   Additionally, I understand that the charge amount of £100 had previously been upheld in court due to a ‘legitimate interest in making sure that a car park was run as efficiently as possible to benefit other drivers as well as the local stores, keeping cars from overstaying’.   However, this is not applicable when the shop or store is closed (as was the case here), as there is no legitimate interest. Therefore, the amount demanded is a penalty and is punitive, again contravening the Consumer Rights Act 2015.   As the driver’s intention of the visit was genuine, I would be grateful if you could please instruct your client to cancel this Notice to Keeper/Parking Charge Notice.   Kind regards
    • I received the promised call back from the Saga man today who informed me that the undertakers have decreed it IS a modification and they will need to recalculate a quote individually for me. However it all sounds very arbitrary. The more I think about it, and with help from forum replies, the more I am sure that it is not a modification. If for example the original seatback had become damaged by a spillage or a tear, I would be entitled to replace it with the nearest available part. The problem is when it comes to a payout after an accident, there is no telling what an individual insurer will decide when he notices the change. I am still undecided which of the two best routes to go with, either don't mention the replacement at all, or fill in the quote form without mentioning, and when it comes to buying the insurance over the phone, mention it at the time.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

unknown LInk CCJ re Barclaycard debt - now after charging order


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2344 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

I've been helping someone with their debts and managed to get most of them into a plan or written off due to mental health issues and advice from CAB,

 

today we have received a letter from a firm of solicitors along with a list of creditors (and credit file) with said persons name on...

then to find out several family members have received a copy as well..

 

this person owns the property they live in..

the debt in question is 2k for an old credit card debt that got sold on and sold on

we had asked for a cca request back in may of last year and

again in june (14 days after the first request) neither request was responded to..

 

fast forward to this year

a solicitor wrote informing they were pursuing for a ccj..

again we requested cca request from the DCA that purchased said debt and nothing..

even sending a template including postal order to the solicitor involved who never banked the postal order but never returned it either

just sent a statement of account not the cca request..

 

just curious as to why they would send several family members copies of this persons debt file as it were and financial details when they have no interest or legal obligation to the house the person lives in.. and is or could this be construed as a drop the ball type thing and dpa breach and report to SRA or law society..

 

the relatives that received said copies were ok about it just decided to discuss the business with people everywhere..

as they do like to gossip..

 

my question ultimately is

Link financial failed to respond to a CCA request,

Kearns Solicitors failed to respond to a CCA request..

and now they've applied a charging order

or tried to and cc'd in the family so to speak..

is this even legal?

 

what are the next steps..

and could some one point me in the right direction because my head is spinning..

between gossips discussing this person business driving their mental health into a further state of depression

(also has bpd and trying to keep them calm so as not to trigger)

a bpd episode..

 

many thanks in advance :x:x

Cabot Financial they came they didn't stay and they left rather quickly

 

Lloyds Tsb - bye bye

 

Lowell Financial - bye bye

 

:whoo::whoo::lol::lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

let me guess

a Barclaycard debt?

 

they cant get a charging order with first getting a CCJ...

 

so what ARE they actually going on about please

scan the letters to PDF

read upload

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I really want to see what they have sent - IF its true what they have sent then they could be had for breakfast.

Are you SURE that its a credit report thats been sent.? Who sent it?

 

Need more info.

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i will update in the morning as its been a long long day

but the long and short of it is i sent a cca request it was ignored..

. as i pointed out above..

then the solicitors 'kearns' said i did not include a postal order which i did and they never banked only sent a statement of account then proceeded with a ccj..

 

we received zero notification about that either until this paperwork arrived today..

 

so now its a charging order.

.(i assume its a charging order they have gone for after digging about online and finding out this is not the first instance of them doing so)

 

fine ok i'm still waiting for the cca request from both link and kearns..

 

but i'm confused as to why they would write to the persons' relatives include a copy of the credit file..(46 pages in total) details of the whats left of the mortgage on the property...

Cabot Financial they came they didn't stay and they left rather quickly

 

Lloyds Tsb - bye bye

 

Lowell Financial - bye bye

 

:whoo::whoo::lol::lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

so they got a CCJ against him

sent to an old address and he knew nowt about it?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no other address involved.

. although there is an identical address within the same city..

same street name same city just opposite ends but only difference would be the post code and obviously name on property.

. although the other one is a commercial property.

 

. and why on earth would they inform family members of financial details to this person when they have no financial links to the person owing the money if indeed they do owe the money

Cabot Financial they came they didn't stay and they left rather quickly

 

Lloyds Tsb - bye bye

 

Lowell Financial - bye bye

 

:whoo::whoo::lol::lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

well that's not the issue is it

 

the issue is

the poor bloke has a CCJ

they are now going for a charging order

and he doesn't have a leg to stand on.

 

so if you were dealing at time

blindly sending CCA requests etc etc

what happened when you got the claimform [big brown envelope from northants bulk court?]

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

nothing received about a ccj claim form i know to log on to moneyclaim and defend their and click enter defence then ask for a cpr31.14 from whoever is bringing the claim and zip nada nothing..

 

with regards to cca request

 

i sent 2 to link financial they never opened the letters simply returned via royal mail unopened as i sent them may and june last year recorded delivery

 

i thought maybe i'd got the address wrong the first time but, obviously not after digging about online and on [removed] they are known to do this.....

Cabot Financial they came they didn't stay and they left rather quickly

 

Lloyds Tsb - bye bye

 

Lowell Financial - bye bye

 

:whoo::whoo::lol::lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh god you've not been following that fmotl twaddle have you...

 

its funny the claimform is the only doc that appears you didn't get

as there would have been a pre action letter of claim too?

 

have you got a copy of the CCJ ?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

nothing as yet..

will go through all the paperwork in the morning..

and no only messed with something along those lines once..

 

i'm a firm believe in telling creditors that i have no money

here is my budget for the money

either accept token payments or right it off..

successful up until now and with several cca requests..

fmotl messes ya head up..

 

the money claim online was advice give by both cab, mas, and national debtline i think it was.

. this is the only company we have had issues with it seems.

. all the others accepted this person has severe mh issues and quite happily wrote off most of the debt or closed accounts with an unsettled balance but agreed to not pursue for fear of causing distress..

 

i used a template from a site regarding mh issues and writing off debt it could have been mind to be honest..

Cabot Financial they came they didn't stay and they left rather quickly

 

Lloyds Tsb - bye bye

 

Lowell Financial - bye bye

 

:whoo::whoo::lol::lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

well that's link for you sadly.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so by clicking the link for the defence was a cock up of endless proportions then? arghh smh.. can this still be argued with and brought back to pre ccj and possibly a f&f agreed for this debt..

Cabot Financial they came they didn't stay and they left rather quickly

 

Lloyds Tsb - bye bye

 

Lowell Financial - bye bye

 

:whoo::whoo::lol::lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

no I meant that's LINK [DCA] for you.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ahhh sorry long stressful day going round in circle with this x so i've once again sent a cca request to link financial and again to kearns this time via special post (£6.50 for 2 letters) so they cannot deny receiving anything again.. just wondering what my next move would be .. this poor woman is beside herself as her financial details are now common knowledge.. including accounts frozen.. settled etc it just doesn't make sense

Cabot Financial they came they didn't stay and they left rather quickly

 

Lloyds Tsb - bye bye

 

Lowell Financial - bye bye

 

:whoo::whoo::lol::lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to Financial Legal Issues...please continue to post here to your thread.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

why don't you ring northants bulk

ask for a copy of the CCJ and the claimform by email PDF

 

lets see when and where they filed this

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OP you appear uncertain of every thing (CCJ, charge on property etc) and may be out of your depth on this. Creditors deserve more than a 'token' payment but what debtor can reasonably be expected to pay.

Why did yo send a Postal Order, which can be cashed by anyone at a PO with min checks, rather than a traceable Bank cheque?

Link to post
Share on other sites

What date was the ccj (the default judgment) awarded against your friend?

 

Your friend needs to make an application on form N244 to apply to have the judgment (the ccj) set aside on grounds that the claim form (N1) was not served on him/her, the defendant.

 

Evidence on your friend’s credit files of the ccj is not proof that the claim form was served on her/him!

 

This application must be made to the court where judgment was entered against the defendant (it is most likely that the claimant obtained judgement by default as no acknowledgement of service was filed and no defence filed against the claim).

 

In relation to the charging order, at present the judgment creditor has an interim charging order and there is going to be a hearing for a final charging order.

 

Your friend must file and serve his/her response to this action by way of a witness statement, and set out the facts that the claim form was never served and that he/she has applied to have the default judgment set aside, and also set out the fact that the original creditor and this judgment creditor have never responded to the CCA request and that as a matter of law the credit agreement relied upon cannot be enforced.

Set out the relevant sections of the CCA 1974 which clearly state that a creditor cannot enforce the credit agreement if he has failed to comply with a CCA request.

 

The default judgment is irregular and the judgment debtor is applying for a set aside, for reason of these facts the judgment debtor requests that this court stays the proceedings on the final charging order pending the outcome of the set aside application.

 

The set aside application should be made ASAP! There is a court fee of £255 payable to the court for this application (N244).

 

Get the set aside application filed and issued (sealed by the court) as a matter of high priority and serve a copy of the sealed application on the judgment creditor, and also serve a copy of it with your friend’s witness statement objecting to the final charging order!

 

 

The witness statement must be in your friend’s own words, and verified by a statement of truth, signed and dated, and then filed to the court and a copy served on the judgment creditor (serve on his representatives – his solicitors named in the charging order application).

 

Does your friend have any evidence to prove that a CCA request was made and not responded to?

 

What date has been set for the final charging order hearing?

 

Please forget about making any complaints on any other matters for now, and concentrate only on the above important paperwork!

 

Do you know if there was any ppi on your friend’s credit agreement for this £2k?

 

Haunter

Link to post
Share on other sites

N244 and ex160a downloaded and filled in as on esa for mental health issues and memory loss as a result of a cva sepsis strokes kidney failure etc..

 

as for cca request i have sent another request yesterday to both the solicitor involved and Link aka IDR finance with a stern letter of complaint

 

i have now this morning obtained all copies of the letter sent out and thankfully have copies of a ccj claim and judgement given on 21st September 2017..

 

this is an 'interim order' we have 28 days to file an objection which of course i will do..

 

however i know whole heartedly this person has not received any of this paperwork other than a letter back months ago when they said they were now acting on behalf of Link and i requested a cca request then and nothing was ever received

Cabot Financial they came they didn't stay and they left rather quickly

 

Lloyds Tsb - bye bye

 

Lowell Financial - bye bye

 

:whoo::whoo::lol::lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your friend’s set aside application should be based on the fact that the creditor was not entitled to enforce the credit agreement because the creditor failed to comply with his request made to the creditor under section 77 Consumer Credit Agreements Act 1974, and sub-section 4(a) prohibits the creditor from enforcing the agreement as a consequence of his failure to comply with the section 77 request made to him.

 

 

Even if the creditor can establish that the claim was validly served on your friend, this is irrelevant because the creditor was not entitled to enforce the agreement, and therefore the default judgment has been obtained by the creditor in contravention of s.77(4)(a) of the 1974 Act, and it cannot be allowed to stand.

 

 

Your friend should therefore request that the default judgment be revoked under CPR 3.1(7), rather than set aside.

 

 

These facts and the law is all that is required to be set out in the N244 application.

 

 

CCA 1974:

 

77 Duty to give information to debtor under fixed-sum credit agreement.E+W+S+N.I.

(1)The creditor under a regulated agreement for fixed-sum credit, within the prescribed period after receiving a request in writing to that effect from the debtor and payment of a fee of £1, shall give the debtor a copy of the executed agreement (if any) and of any other document referred to in it, together with a statement signed by or on behalf of the creditor showing, according to the information to which it is practicable for him to refer,—

(a)the total sum paid under the agreement by the debtor;

(b)the total sum which has become payable under the agreement by the debtor but remains unpaid, and the various amounts comprised in that total sum, with the date when each became due; and

©the total sum which is to become payable under the agreement by the debtor, and the various amounts comprised in that total sum, with the date, or mode of determining the date, when each becomes due.

 

(4) If the creditor under an agreement fails to comply with subsection (1)—

(a)he is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement

 

Haunter

 

 

By the way, when a judgment creditor applies for a charging order, he is granted an interim charging order as a matter of 'rubber stamp' job, he gets the interim charge automatically.

 

 

Your friend needs to make the application (N244) I referred to above and seek to have the default judgment revoked (see facts and law above in my earlier post).

 

 

The interim charging order will be made a final charging order if your friend is unable to defeat it!

 

 

No time to hang around, concentrate and focus on the important stuff first - the N244 application and then start preparing the response objecting to the charging order!

 

 

Haunter

 

Another point is this: if the creditor now complies with this further s.77 CCA request, his compliance cannot be applied retrospectively to the default judgment he obtained, because at the time he obtained it he was in default and not entitled under s.77(4)(a) to enforce the agreement.

 

 

The court was deceived and mislead by the creditor as to the factual position before it in relation to his entitlement to enforce the agreement!

 

 

Haunter

Link to post
Share on other sites

urm....

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you

but your logic is not

a CCJ trumps any need to provide any enforceable paperwork after the event.

 

post 17 needs answering lilly did you ring northants today

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh yes I know dx.

 

But the interests of justice trumps all things.

 

The op is wasting time with requesting a copy of the agreement.

 

It appears to be the case that the default judgment was awarded at a time when the creditor was not entitled to enforce the agreement because of his failure to comply with the cca request.

 

So, even if the op's friend had acknowledge the claim and filed a defence against it, if the matter went on to a full hearing/trial, the fact of the creditor's non-compliance with the cca would have been made known to the court and the court would have to strike out his claim on grounds of no entitlement to enforce.

 

I hope that makes what I'm saying a bit more clearer.

 

Haunter

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...