Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell claimform - old vanquis card debt - opps used CPR 18 - help theyve complied!!


macker16
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2096 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

The advice i require is regarding Lowell Solictors for a Vanquis debt for £3000.

 

After receiving the County Court paperwork i acknowledged the claim with the intention to defend and submitted a CCA request and CPR18 request on the 4 July 2017.

I did not receive any of the information from the CPR18 request and the claim was then put forward for mediation but didn't progress any further due to me not having the information that i requested from Lowell.

 

I then didn't hear anything from the courts until a few weeks ago when i then got a copy of a letter from my local court that they sent to Lowells requesting the information on the CPR18 and to provide it within 21 days or the claim will be struck out.

 

To my horror Lowells have provided the courts with this information i have now got a letter from the court saying the following:

 

It is ordered that

1. Unless by 4pm on 21 November 2017 the defendant is to send to the claimant and this court setting out an amended defence (if so advised) the court will consider the papers and may strike out the current defence and permit the claimant to seek judgement in default,

 

2. Pursuant to CPR3.3(5) this order has been made without a hearing being held.

If you object to the order, you may make an application (with the appropriate fee) to have it set aside, varied or stayed within 7 days of receiving it.

 

What does all this mean?

Does it mean that the CCJ as good as stamped on my credit file?

 

Any advice you can give would be much appreciated.

 

Many thanks in advance

 

Macker16

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 148
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Macker, i will ask the site team to move this to the financial legal part of the site.

 

You are going to have to provide a lot of information, so you can provide an amended defence. If you can work with the guys on this site that deal with these issues, then you might avoid getting a CCJ.

 

Part 18 was probably wrong. Should have been a CPR 31:14 letter to ask for any documents Lowell stated.

 

I will add a link shortly to info you need to read and what info we need. You need to copy/paste over the questions in post#1 and answer these.

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**UPDATED-2016**

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Appreciate you are already some way down the line with this but it will help if we can have more details

 

Could you go here https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**UPDATED-2016**(1-Viewing)-nbsp and copy and paste here filling out out the necessary details for your case. People will then have more information about the Particulars Of Claim, the age of the debt, last payment etc

 

Agree this should have been a CPR 31.14 request so that Lowell were obligated to provide all of the documents referred to in the PoC

 

Do not take it for granted that Lowlifes have actually supplied everything required to get this past a Court - they may have actually supplied very little but enough to convince a Judge that they have complied. Have yo0u actually had sight of what has been provided to the Court?

 

Did they supply a CCA in response to your request?

 

What was the wording of your defence? It would help those with the best knowledge enormously to be able to get a full picture ASAP rather than have to keep asking for more details

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

pop all of lowells return into ONE multipage PDF please

read UPLOAD

 

and no its not given that the CCJ is granted

very much far from it!

 

once we have their return

that questionnaire done

and a copy of your already lodged defence we will have all we need to best advise.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

How did the court get hold of the CPR 18 ?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Firstly thank you to everyone that has taken the time to read my post and apologies for the delay in responding, the stress of it all triggered a migraine. Looks like i was wrongly advised about using a CPR18!

 

I have scanned in all the documents into 1 PDF but have had to copy and paste my defence as i dont have it saved anywhere because i uploaded online.

 

*CCA Request

*Vanquis explanation for electronic application signature

*Notice of default from Vanquis

*Digital signature Application details

*Notice of assignment from Lowells

 

Lowells also sent a statement of all transactions on my account from start to finish. The last payment on the account was on the 30 September 2015.

 

 

CASE SUMMARY

 

1.I am the Defendant in this case.

 

2. On the 12 June 2107 the Claimant submitted a claim to

Northampton County Court stating their particulars of claim.

 

3. I returned the Acknowledgement of Service on 20 June 2017

stating that I intend to defend the claim.

 

4. The Defendant sent out a CPR18 request letter on 4 July 2017

by recorded delivery (tracking number BH540178711GB), asking for

the following documents to be produced in court:

 

• The deed of assignment

• The notice of assignment

• The default warning letter

• The default notice

• Termination Notice

 

5. On the 4 July the Defendant issued a CCA request to Lowell

Portfolio I Ltd for a copy of the original signed credit

agreement.

6. The Defendant denies monies are owed to the Claimant as

alleged in the Particulars of Claim and does not recognise the

assertion that any debt has been Legally Assigned to the Claimant

and as such the Claimant is put to the strictest of proof and

providing all documents that were requested.

 

7. To date the claimant has only been able to provide the

defendant with what they are saying is the Notice of Assignment.

I do not believe this to be the original copy of the Notice of

Assignment as it is not on any headed paper.

 

8. The Claimant has given no good reason at all to the Defendant

for this failure to comply with the Defendant’s legal rights of

entitlement to inspect the document that the Claimant’s claim is

to rely on.

9. The conduct of the Claimant is denying the Defendant the

right to submit a full defence. Therefore I feel I cannot plead

to the claim at present because the Claimant is being

uncooperative and has not supplied sufficient evidence to back up

their claim.

 

10 Also, in my defence, I am not a Solicitor and after having

read the Particular of Claim I cannot see any legislation has

been quoted in support of the Claimants claim against me, which

leaves me unsure under which Statutory Instrument this Claim has

been brought. Therefore, again to be able to properly defend this

claim I would request full details of the actual legislation the

Claimant believes gives them a right to make this claim, as

surely no claim can succeed without this being quoted in the

Particulars of Claim.

 

Statement of Truth I believe the facts stated within this Defence

to be true comprising of 2 pages.

 

Dated this day July of year 2017

 

i got into financial difficulty with the account after having a relationship breakup and then struggling to support 2 children on 1 wage, i did make contact with Vanquis to arrange a payment plan but then failed to keep up with that when i then became unwell with depression which ended up with me burying my head in the sand.

 

Thank you in advance for any advice that you can give and fingers crossed that i still have something to go back to the courts with.

 

Kind regards

Macker16

docs1 .pdf

Edited by dx100uk
document properly redacted - dx
Link to post
Share on other sites

documents properly redacted

what did we say in the upload guide about using a pen?

we can see thru it!:lol:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So basically you made an application to enforce the CPR 18 hoping that they couldn't comply...and they have.....?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well submitting an application to enforce a CPR 18 is very risky and restricts your options in defending a claim...you shorten the normal process.

 

You will have to scan redact and upload what they have disclosed along with the court paperwork in connection to CPR 18 Order.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I have now uploaded the evidence again with personal info covered

also attached at the information i received after sending the CPR18.

 

Lowells sent the Directions Questionairre directly to me and opted for mediation but and when i received my directions questionnaire

i also acted on the information given and selected mediation.

 

However, when i received the paperwork from mediation i was unable to proceed with it as i said i did not have all the evidence that i had asked for from the claimant and so they said it would have to be referred to my local court.

 

I then heard nothing for quite a few weeks,

i got a letter from my local court asking for evidence from the claimant (also in the PDF) to be provided by the 4 October.

 

Any help would be much appreciated,

 

i've never dealt with anything like this before and haven't got a clue what i am doing which you have probably worked out for yourselves.

 

I now realise i should have come on here to start with but too late for that now,

 

i just hoping the experienced people on the forum and see something that Lowells have missed that i can't see and that i do have some sort of defence.

 

Thank you in advance

 

Macker16

docs2.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you make application under CPR 18 at the same time you submitted your DQ ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

document redacted properly [again!]

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you make application under CPR 18 at the same time you submitted your DQ ?

 

I sent the cpr18 after acknowkedging the claim and then submitting my defence. Lowells then sent the DQ and the court then sent one to me. So the cpr18 went in first.

 

Macker16

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could you please upload a copy of the Order dated 4th October for tomorrow and I will get back to you.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I think i'm getting a bit confused, i have uploaded a copy of the order that relates to Lowells providing the documentation by the 4 October and the previous court order that says it had to be provided by the 4 October is the last document on the attachments last night.

 

Just want to say thank you to the people that have taken the time to read through the mess that i have got myself into.

 

Macker16

4th order.pdf

Edited by dx100uk
ref number removed - dx
Link to post
Share on other sites

only one order in that PDF

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I think i'm getting a bit confused, i have uploaded a copy of the order that relates to Lowells providing the documentation by the 4 October and the previous court order that says it had to be provided by the 4 October is the last document on the attachments last night.

 

Just want to say thank you to the people that have taken the time to read through the mess that i have got myself into.

 

Macker16

 

No thats the Order dated 20th October to you the defendant...the Order dated 4th October will be to the claimant....which the court should have served you a copy.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

you keep leaving ref numbers on things

PLEASE redact things PROPERLY!!

every upload so far you've done it.

sorting this one now too

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I have now attached the court order that i received a copy of dated 4 October, i hope this is the one that you are referring to as i have not received any others.

 

Macker6

 

Thank you ....if not already can we have their particulars of claim (verbatim)...then we will be in a position to advise on an amended defence.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I've uploaded all the documents that i have had from Lowells and the court, is this something that i should have received and haven't? Would it of been on the first claim form from Northampton county coutt when i had to acknowledge it?

 

Many thanks

 

Macker16

 

Yes from the N1 court claim

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...