Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Noumidia Vs Capitalone


Noumidia
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1884 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I made a claim against Capital one about the charges in 2014 by sending the first letter then followed by LBA.

 

On 14th April 2014, I received a letter from Capital one refused to refund the charges and they stated in their letter

“Financial regulations require me to advise you that this is my final response in relation to this matter.

If you fell I have not resolved your complaint to your complete satisfaction,

you now have the option to contact the Financial Ombudsman Service with six months from the date of this letter.”

 

I know I should have taken the case to the court sooner after I received the rejection letter for the claim.

 

On February 2017, I decided to make fresh claim and I send LBA,

Capital One replied to my LBA by saying

“Please refer to our letter dated 14th April 2014,

which was our final response on this complaint.”

 

Also the keep saying I had the chance to contact FOS within 6 months from the date of our final response.

My question is can I still file a claim through a small claim court?

capital#21_02_2017.pdf

capital#16_11_2016.pdf

capital#14_04_2014.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

don't forget you have to abide by the new pre action protocol now

it changed 1st oct.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes because it works vice versa... Claimant claims money for charges etc

the new debt protocol says '...This Protocol applies to any business (including sole traders and public bodies) claiming payment of a debt from an individual...'

 

ps

could you imagine a bank/business having to fill out the reply form, and income and expend form, and seeking debt advice from cab etc. that would be interesting. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I send a Sar I. 2014 and received the whole pack as usual.

 

However the statement is back dated from 2002 even the a/c was open in 1999.

 

Between 2002 and 2004 there are about £500 of charges in late and cover! Iimit fee.

 

My question are

1) Should I file a court claim ignoring the charges before 2002?

 

2) Is possible to file a claim directly to my near county court ?

 

Thank you for your assistance

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

have you had a look at their brief guide

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/639667/MCOL_Userguide_for_Claimants_August_2017.pdf

 

if you're not comfortable doing the extra re the PoC, then it may be easier for you to do it on paper.

 

see what the guys suggest.

 

broken link above, try this one

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/money-claim-online-user-guide

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ford

 

 

I think, MCOL it's little complicated and I am more comfortable with filling N1 as I did against Barclay and Lowell. As the claim is over 5k I want to make sure everything is right, Cap1 are more harder to deal with but take my chances with them as they give me hard time 10 years ago default,CCJ and charging order which still stand.

Link to post
Share on other sites

forgot to add

also, now, a paper n1 for a fixed money claim should be sent to the money claims centre, salford.

the fee is also a bit more when doing paper.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi

I went today to my local Croydon County Court to hand my N1 as my Poc does not fit MCOL's Poc,

sadly all counter services were shut down few months ago.

 

If phoned MCOL help line and advised to send the N1 to Salford with the fees as a cheque or a postal order

however, i don't have a cheque book anymore.

 

MCOL advised to send the extra Poc to the defendent within 14 days of the claim being issued with a covering letter and fill the N215.

 

My question is

1) Does anyone has a template for a short statement to fill up the part5 of MCOL form?

 

2) Do i need to tick the right to claim interest under the county court or not to tick it and include the county court interest in Poc?

 

Thanks in advance for any assistance

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

it is defended then?

no fee for aq, it just needs to be completed and filed in time.

you didn't see the user guide info i posted then.

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ford

Probably I missed the link, but thanks for the reply and I am not forgetting your assistance last time when with a successful claim against Barclay card in 2013. I am pleased you are still around.

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry, to double check,

you are the claimant?

at what stage are you at

have they defended, and it is now proceeding after you have paid the fee to continue?

you may need to pay a fee

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone know how is the fees for allocation questionnaire, few years ago was £40. I couldn't find it in Ex50 leafle as the deadline is 29 January. Any assistance would be appreciated and thanks

 

Replaced by the hearing fee which is paid later after allocation and detailed within the Notice of Allocation.....amount ...date to be paid.

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

Here is the update of the claim from MCOL

 

 

  • You submitted a claim on 08/12/2017 at 15:00:42
     
  • Your claim was issued on 11/12/2017
     
  • Capital One (Europe) plc filed an acknowledgment of service on 19/12/2017
     
  • A bar was put in place for Capital One (Europe) plc on 12/01/2018
     
  • Capital One (Europe) plc filed a defence on 12/01/2018
     
  • DQ sent to Capital One (Europe) plc on 12/01/2018
     
  • Capital One (Europe) plc filed a DQ on 30/01/2018DQ filed on 30/01/2018.
     

Capital1 is playing Hard ball but I will go all the way until the hearing day and start preparing the defense

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...