Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Should this to be take into court with him or should he send something in earlier?
    • This is the other sign  parking sign 1a.pdf
    • 4 means that they need to name and then tell the people who will be affected that there has been an application made, what the application relates to (specificially "whether it relates to the exercise of the court’s jurisdiction in relation to P’s property and affairs, or P’s personal welfare, or to both) and what this application contains (i.e what order they want made as a result of it) 5 just means that teh court think it is important that the relevant people are notified 7 means that the court need more information to make the application, hence they have then made the order of paragraph 1 which requires the applicant to do more - this means the court can't make a decision with the current information, and need more, hence paragraph one of the order is for the applicant to do more. paragraph 3 of the order gives you the ability to have it set aside, although if it was made in january you are very late. Were you notiifed of the application or not?    
    • These are the photos of the signs. At the entrance there is a 7h free sign. On some bays there is a permit sign.  Also their official website is misleading as it implies all parking is free.  I can't be certain of the exact parking bay I was in that day, and there was no PCN ticket on my car and no other evidence was provided.  parking sign 2.pdf
    • Hi, In my last post I mentioned I had received an email from SS who were asking me to hand over the keys to my mother’s flat so they could pass them to the Law firm who have been appointed court of protection to access, secure and insure my mother’s property.  Feeling this, all quickly getting out of my hands I emailed ss requesting proof of this. I HAVEN’T HEARD BACK FROM SS.  Yesterday, I received an email (with attached court of protection order) from the Law Firm confirming this was correct (please see below a copy of this).  After reading the court of protection order I do have some concerns about it:   (a)   I only found out yesterday, the Law firm had been appointed by the court back in January.  Up until now, I have not received any notification regarding this.  (b)   Section 2   - States I am estranged from my mother.  This is NOT CORRECT    The only reason I stepped back from my mother was to protect myself from the guy (groomer) who had befriended her & was very aggressive towards me & because of my mother’s dementia she had become aggressive also.  I constantly tried to warned SS about this guy's manipulative behaviour towards my mother and his increasing aggressiveness towards me (as mentioned in previous posts).  Each time I was ignored.  Instead, SS encouraged his involvement with my mother – including him in her care plans and mental health assessments.   I was literally pushed out because I feared him and my mother’s increasing aggression towards me. Up until I stepped back, I had always looked after my mother and since her admission to the care home, I visit regularly.   .(c)    Sections -  4, 5 and 7  I am struggling to understand these as I don’t have a legal background.  I was wondering if there is anyone who might be able to explain what they mean.  It’s been a horrendous situation where I had to walk away from my mother at her most vulnerable because of; ss (not helping), scammer and groomer. I have no legal background, nor experience in highly manipulative people or an understanding of how the SS system operates, finding myself isolated, scared and powerless to the point I haven’t collected my personal belongings and items for my mother’s room in the care home.  Sadly, the court has only had heard one version of this story SS’s, and based their decision on that. My mother’s situation and the experience I have gone through could happen to anyone who has a vulnerable parent.    If anyone any thoughts on this much appreciated.  Thank you. ______________________________________________________  (Below is the Court of Protection Order)  COURT OF PROTECTION                                                                                                                                                                                   No xxx  MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005 In the matter of Name xxx ORDER Made by  Depty District Judge At xxx Made on xxx Issued on 18 January 2024  WHEREAS  1.     xxx Solicitors, Address xxx  ("Applicant”) has applied for an order under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.  2.     The Court notes (my mother) is said to be estranged from all her three children and only one, (me) has been notified.  3.     (Me) was previously appointed as Atorney for Property and Affairs for (my mother).  The Exhibity NAJ at (date) refers to (me) and all replacement Attorneys are now officially standing down.  4.     Pursuant to Rule 9.10 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 and Practice Direction 9B the Applicant 2must seek to identify at least three persons who are likely to have an interest in being notified that an application has been issues.”  The children of (my mother), and any other appointed attorneys are likely to have an interest in the application, because of the nature of relationship to (my mother).  5.     The Court considers that the notification requirements are an important safeguard for the person in respect of whom an order is sought.  6.     The Court notes that it is said that the local authority no longer has access to (my mother’s) Property.  7.     Further information is required for the Court to determine the application.  IT IS ORDERED THAT  Within 28 days of the issue date this order, the Applicant shall file a form COP24 witness statement confirming that the other children of (my mother) and any replacement attorneys have been notified of the application and shall confirm their name, address, and date upon which those persons were notified.  If the Applicant wishes the Court to dispense with any further notification, they should file a COP9 and COP24 explaining, what steps (if any) have been taken to attempt notification and why notification should be dispensed with.   Pending the determination of the application to appoint a deputy for (my mother), the Applicant is authorised to take such steps as are proportionate and necessary to access, secure and insure the house and property of (my mother).   This order was made without a hearing and without notice.  Any person affected by this order may apply within 21 days of the date on which the order was served to have the order set aside or varied pursuant to Rule 13.4 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 (“the Rules”).  Such application must be made on Form COP9 and in accordance with Part 10 Rules.              
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

PRA Claimform - old MBNA Credit card debt ***Claim Dismissed no DN***


Betty55
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2067 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I got into a lot of credit card debt and have 2 ccj already in 2013.

 

I have continued to bury my head in sand and ignore letters re my other cc debts.

 

I received another ccj claim dated 10th October and was going to just fill in expenditure form and offer payment

 

I struggle with dealing with this due to mental health so

 

send back acknowledge service to buy more time to complete forms.

 

Last night I came across this site and am now wondering if I should try to defend it.?

 

It’s very last minute and I don’t know if I have time?

I’ve never tried this before.

 

The debt was sold to PRA group they are claimant and the debt was £13k

on the claim they are also asking for another £4,500 interest now over £18k they want.

I will have to go bankrupt if I end up with an 18k ccj

 

They say I signed agreement in 2002 and defaulted in 2013.

 

I have never answered any calls or letters.

 

I have to send a defence or admission I think in next few days.

 

I should have looked into this sooner.

 

Is it too late do I need to offer payments

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 216
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Betty and Welcome to CAG

 

If you could read the following link and then copy and paste the Q,s and your responses back here for further advice.

 

You need to request a copy of the credit agreement and also complete a CPR 31.14 request (instructions are contained in the link)

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**UPDATED-2016**(1-Viewing)-nbsp

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for reply

 

Name of the Claimant ? PRA group ltd

 

Date of issue – 10 Oct 2017

 

What is the claim for –

 

1.The claimant claims the sum of £16,800.50 for debt and interest.

2.On 22/09/2002 the defendant entered into an agreement with MBNA Europe bank ltd for a credit card underdressed ref xxxxxx.

3.On the 21/05/12013 the defendant defaulted on the agreement with an outstanding balance of £13k.

4.On the 20/06/13 the debt of £13k assigned to PRA group ltd.

Notices of assignments were sent to the defendant in accordance with s136 law of property act 1925.

5.Payments of 0.00 received up to 29/06/13 and

the claimant claim the sum of £13k .

Statutory interest pursuant to section 69 of the county courts act 1984 at a rate of 8.00% per annum from 23/06/13 to 1/10/17 £4,900 and thereafter at a daily rate of 2.90 until judgement or sooner payment

 

What is the value of the claim? £18k

 

Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit card

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? 2002

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. PRA

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Can’t remember

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Can’t find one

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? No

Why did you cease payments? Got into a lot of debt after divorce mental health problems

What was the date of your last payment? May 2013

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management Plan . No

Link to post
Share on other sites

so defence due by Friday 4pm.

.

get a CCA Request running to the claimant

leave the £1PO blank and uncrossed

.

get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors

.

type your name ONLY

 

no need to sign anything

.

you DO NOT await the return of paperwork.

you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.

 

GET CCA/CPR running TODAY

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Follow dx's advice. Its unlikely theyll ever get the proper paperwork, so are trying to foce through a CCJ befor eyou realise. Especially as they got greedy and have seen that amount.

 

Again, you MUST follow dx's advice to the letter, or you will end up paying this amount that you very VERY likely will never need to pay.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou

I have done the CCA Request but am waiting for someone to return with ink for printer as usual it all goes wrong when in a hurry.

 

I am doing the cpr.31.14 now but the claim form does not state solicitor details the address for sending documents is the same as the claimants pra group.

 

There is no details of the solicitors address so not sure where to send it? Any ideas?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send your requests to PRA

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for help

Should I send both cca and cpr together or separately ?

 

Together if you wish but get a receipt of postage

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have done the cpr31.14 and cca and am wondering

do I put today’s date on the letters as I’m so late sending them given I received the claim forms on 17th October

whether this will be a problem for me in my defence due to me taking so long to request this information?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No...put today's date on...we can work around that in the defence

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all I have just done the post office dash and sent the CCA and CPR31.14 via special delivery.

 

I am going to do the defence online through the mcol website.

 

I have been looking at some threads but cannot find guidance to complete the defence so not sure which area of site to find this.

 

Any direction to where I should look for information about doing the defence would be much appreciated thank you

 

Betty55

Link to post
Share on other sites

use the search CAG box of the top red toolbar

 

claimform PRA credit card

 

post it up here 1st for checking.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks dx

Sorry I’m new to all this I search for cliamform PRA credit card ? And post the defence forms on here before submitting them?

 

I’ve just noticed something else.

 

On the particular of claim it says on the 20/06/13 the debt was assigned to PRA group.

 

But I have letters from Aktiv capital in June 2013 and then from tempos solutions in 2014 .

 

then another from Buchanan Clark and wells acting for activ capital in April 2014.

 

Are they all the same company or can several DCAs be assigned the same debt?

 

I don’t understand it all

Link to post
Share on other sites

https://cse.google.co.uk/cse?cx=partner-pub-0964707606882478:652l7hswbgv&ie=UTF-8&q=claimform+PRA+credit+card&sa=Search+CAG#gsc.tab=0&gsc.q=claimform%20PRA%20credit%20card&gsc.page=1

 

post it up here FIRST

as it will need slight adaption now from those that you'll find as the rules have changed.

no rush you have till Friday

but have a go

 

as for the DCA's all the same lot!

just trying to kid you it going up some kind of 'ladder'

 

don't ever forget

a DCA is NOT A BAILIFF

they have zero legal powers.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you dx I wiill

Bit panicked as in work all day tomorrow and Friday but will work on it tonight and tomorrow night to get it done at least it can be sent online not another post office sprint

Link to post
Share on other sites

have a go if not well post something for you

its better you have an idea rather than going in blind

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Shamefully lifted from others posts but thought would check if I am on the right track?

 

The particular of claim (do I put this in my defence form?)

 

1.The claimant claims the sum of £16,800.50 for debt and interest. On 22/09/2002 the defendant entered into an agreement with MBNA Europe bank ltd for a credit card underdressed ref xxxxxx. . On the 21/05/12013 the defendant defaulted on the agreement with an outstanding balance of £13k. 4.On the 20/06/13 the debt of £13k assigned to PRA group ltd.

Notices of assignments were sent to the defendant in accordance with s136 law of property act 1925.

Payments of 0.00 received up to 29/06/13 and

the claimant claim the sum of £13k .

Statutory interest pursuant to section 69 of the county courts act 1984 at a rate of 8.00% per annum from 23/06/13 to 1/10/17 £4,900 and thereafter at a daily rate of 2.90 until judgement or sooner payment

 

1. The Defendant contends that the Particulars of Claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

 

2. Paragraphs 1 & 2 are noted and is accepted that the Defendant has in the past had financial dealings with MBNA. I am unable to recall the precise details of the alleged agreement or debt by which the Claimant refers to within this claim. The Defendant has sought verification from the Claimant who as of this date has been unable to comply.

 

 

3. Paragraph 3 & 4 are denied. I am not aware of any service of a Default Notice pursuant to section 87 of the consumer credit Act 1974 or of any legal assignment or Notices of Assignment pursuant to the Law and Property Act 1925 Section 136(1) as stated on the claim by the Claimant or by MBNA.

 

4. A request for information pursuant to the Consumer Credit Act (section 78) was made on the 8th November by signed for delivery and a CPR 31.14 request was made by signed for delivery on the 8th November 2017 . To date the Defendant has received no response or acknowledgment from the claimant in relation to the request for information pursuant to the Consumer Credit Act (section 78) or the Claimant’s legal representative regard the CPR 31.14. The Claimant in their non-compliance to my requests therefore remain in default.

 

5. Paragraph 5 is noted.Although the claimant is denied from adding section 69 interest to inflate the debt of any alleged amount outstanding at this time.This is at the discretion of the court whether to allow it in full partially or at all. I have in the past had financial dealings with MBNA ,I do not recollect the precise details of this agreement and have therefore sought clarity by way of a section 78 request to the claimant. As of this date the claimant has failed to comply with my request and is therefore prevented from seeking or requesting any relief until such compliance.

 

6. It is therefore not accepted with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant and the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

 

a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement; and

 

b) show how the Defendant’s alleged debt has reached the amount claimed for; and

 

c) show the nature of breach and service of a Default Notice and subsequent Notice of Sums in Arrears in accordance with the Consumer Credit Act 1974; and

 

d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim.

 

 

7. As per Civil Procedureicon Rule 16.5 (4) it is expected that the Claimant proves the allegation that the money is owed.

 

 

8. On the alternative, as the Claimant claims to be an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of section 136 of the Law of Property Act and section 82A of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

 

9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

 

If anyone has time to check this it would be appreciated as it’s all confusing. I have a lot of reading to do

Betty55

Edited by Betty55
Link to post
Share on other sites

yea done good there

theres a bit to add about the new PAP rules

i'll find it later

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much.

The only thing I was worrying about is that I only sent the requests for cca and cpr today and have had the claim since 17 Oct. do I have to explain in my defence why I have only just sent those requests and not done so sooner? I am worried the judge will give them the ccj because I took too long sending those requests

Betty55

Link to post
Share on other sites

nope as andy said a slight adjustment might be needed that's all.

 

no judge will ever allow a CCJ if the claimant cannot PROVE their case

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou I am a bit of a panicker. I have also realised I made and error in my CCA Request. In this bit.

 

“You are reminded that should you fail to comply with my request: the provisions of s.77 (4)a/78 (6)a/79(3)a will apply”

 

I forgot to delete the s77 & 79 bit. I’m such a numpty. Should I send another ammended letter? Doh

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...