Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided? I am now in a position to clear the debt either by lump sum or a few large installments - Is this something i should look into at this late stage? Thanks as always in advance
    • I have now received my SAR. It includes a great deal of information! Is there a time limit on how long account information is kept and/or can be provided to debtors? I have received many account statements which were not previously sent to me. I remember that the creditor should provide explanations of any acronyms and abbreviations that maybe used in the documents. Is this still the case? Also what, if any, are the regulations in regard to adding fees to a debt? Can fees be added to a debt after the court has approved a charge on a property. Perhaps due to the numerous owners of the debt, many payments I made were not properly recorded on the account, some were entered over a year after the payment was made! Following the Legal Charge, I paid every month until my payments were refused. I am trying to compute the over payments, but the addition of fees etc. is confusing me. Any comments and/or help would be appreciated.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

PRA Claimform - old MBNA Credit card debt ***Claim Dismissed no DN***


Betty55
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2073 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thanks Andy so just submit the same one? Should I mention the lack of NOA and the terms and conditions issue in the DQ? Thanks

 

Yes...but dont request mediation or a months stay this time...the claimant has not issued any directions and simply disclosed a copy of the application and DN and a few statements.

 

There will have to be directions this time otherwise the court will set them at a Case Management Conference...and they will not be too pleased given this is Fast Track

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 216
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

When your ready to complete it give me a nudge and will add further points

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am completing the new DQ and wanted to check I am on the right track if anyone can help.

 

So far PRA have provided a

DN,

signed agreement,

one statement and

a termination notice.

 

It looks like the t&c’s don’t seem to be the correct ones as they start on number 3 and state ‘ refer to credi Agreement for conditions 1&2.

 

I also noticed the the t&cs they sent say that there is an £18 charge for default or going over the credit limit.

 

However, the statement they sent dated 2013 shows the default and limit exceed charges as being £12.

 

I don’t see how in 2002 (the Agreement date) that the charges would be £18 and reduce to £12 by 2013.

 

Makes me think the T&Cs are more recent than 2013 which means they couldn’t be the ones in place in 2002.

 

Could I be onto something or clutching at straws!!!!

 

Rough DQ but not sure for some questions Section A

No to a further stay?

I’m assuming if I’m saying no to a further stay I would have to say no to trying to settle the claim before hearing? During this stay period that is up on 22/01 I did not hear anything about mediation anyway

 

Section B

B1 blank

B2 yes local cc

 

C N/A

 

D1 no

D2 blank

D3 blank

 

D4 not sure what to put here. My last DQ requested the claimant file and serve all original docs including the Agreement/NOA/DN. They did send a DN but no NOA. There is the signed agreement but the T&Cs look dubious. They only sent one statement.

 

E blank

F myself

G less than a day 3/4 hours

H blank

I no

 

My previous DQ stated that the claimant had failed to submit directions and requested standard directions be applied along with standard disclosure. Would I say the same thing in this new DQ?

 

Any help appreciated thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

all charges were reduced to £12 after the FSA investigation in 2006...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

post 74

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

BTW:

its NOT an agreement

its a 2002 signed application form that does not contain ALL the necessary prescribed terms on it.

page 2 is NOT its reverse its from 2013!

 

the rest of the T&C's pages are from jan 02 but ofcourse do not contain your name and address

ts could have come out of anyones filing cabinet

infact they could have downloaded them from here on other threads.

 

BOGPAPER!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

plenty of uploads in the numerous other claimform threads here from fleecing DCA's over an MBNA card debt.

VERY VERY few ever get enforceable paperwork out of MBNA

which is why they all tend to copy and paste fudged up paperwork

incase people want to be conned and give in at WS stage.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I need to read more threads to understand the paperwork better so I know what I’m looking at.

 

I seem to have lost my MCOL ID and password and can’t log in

so will it be ok for me to send the new DQ by post?

 

If anything new has been submitted by the DCA would I be sent a paper copy of

 

would it only go onto mcol as I am unable to check?

 

From reading some threads am I right that i am supposed to try and agree directions with the claimant?

Link to post
Share on other sites

you are way passed the involvement of MCOL.

 

no you don't negotiate with the clamant on new DQ

 

you as they must send a copy of your DQ to each other I believe

 

andy will be around soon

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont submit the DQ yet to your local county court..its requires tweaking as per previous post.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I seem to have lost my MCOL ID and password and can’t log in

so will it be ok for me to send the new DQ by post?

 

If anything new has been submitted by the DCA would I be sent a paper copy of

 

would it only go onto mcol as I am unable to check?

 

From reading some threads am I right that i am supposed to try and agree directions with the claimant?

 

Directions are supposed to be set by the claimant and agreed between yourselves...it appears PRA do not understand the process of Fast Track claims and are dispensing with the need to set directions.

 

D4 leave blank.

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

As the initial notification was from MCOL Northampton then yes return it back to Northampton

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would put no for agree to attempt settlement.......they have already had a month and not attempted.....and state that as your reason for stating no.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thanks Andy.

 

The only thing is when PRA sent the requested documents to me they also sent a letter saying

 

“We are still willing to negotiatie to get this matter resolved. Pleas find enclosed a financial statement for you to complete and return to us”

 

They wanted to know all debts earnings outgoings etc.

I should have put the letter on here with the other stuff.

Sorry didn’t think.

 

They wanted it by 17th so they

“could consider any proposals in a balanced way”

but I didn’t want to fill it in as I thought that would be admitting the debt.

 

Not sure if I’ve done wrong thing now

but can’t say I trust them really giving them that info at this stage as wanted to check first they had all the right paperwork for court

 

Worried I’ve messed up now 😩

Link to post
Share on other sites

well you haven't.

sending an I&E is not an offer of proposed settlement!

its an attempt to get ahold of personal info they have no legal right to see

unless a judge requests that info..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so they sent an offer of settlement as well as the I&E...?

did they indicate what they would settle for?

or was simply make us an offer and we'll laugh at you cause we got all your pers details now sucker..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...