Thank you in advance, any advice is highly appreciated.

The only advice is to keep ignoring. They wont and cant do anything. A court judgement years ago stopped them in their tracks. Now, all they can do is send begging letters and hope you cave in.

Thank you!

Hi,

last week I went to Waitrose,

bought some shopping and did not scan a packet of sushi,

Wonder if you can clear something up for me, so you say you didn't scan a packet of sushi, and by your description, I take you went through a self scan till

This is my main job, in my work, and I see a lot of bagging alerts that come up, sometimes on purpose, but sometimes down to error

So on your part, if going through self scans, was it intentional not to scan the sushi, now if however you had thought you had scanned the sushi, its really up to the self scan host to sort this error out, so I would call that mitigating circumstances

We summarise the options open to you :

 

Submit a written defence, with full account of your version of events. ERM! Nope

Settle the claim, with or without admission, by paying the amount stated £149.50 As if

If you wish to settle the claim, but cannot do so within 14 days, contact us to discuss payment options which include instalments and deferred periods, dependent upon circumstances Like that's going to happen

Negotiate an alternative settlement by containing our Collection Department on 01159706231 Don't bother, they will only harass you more

Advise us of any other relevant circumstances you wish to be taken into account

Here's one for you. Your alleged amount is unlawful

We require a response or payment from you within 14 days of the date of this letter, in order to prevent further action being taken. Our contact information is detailed overleaf.

Require! They can go swivel is my response!

Thank you for your answer!

Another letter from RPL

Without prejudice save as to costs

We write further to previous correspondence in this matter.

In order to demonstrate that our client is committed to trying to find a way to resolve this matter without the need for the issue of court proceedings we are instructed to make a settlement offer in order to conclude the civil claim.

Our client will accept in full and final settlement the sum of the civil claim made against you the sum of 104.65

The offer remains open for acceptance for 21 days after witch time it will be withdrawn.

Please therefore contact us within 3 weeks for your receipt of this letter to confirm it terms can be agreed, or if you have an alternative proposal to make. Your opinions are:

Accept the settlement offered and make a payment

Contact our collection Department if you wish to accept the settlement offered but require more time to make a payment or wish to pay the settlement amount by instalments.

Make an alternative proposal.

We regretfully advise that if we do not hear from you within this time frame, we will seek our clients further instructions as to the issue of proceedings or pass this matter to recovery agents who specialise in recovery payment in undisputed claims without any further notification to you.

I just love their letters. They try to convince you that they have some power.

As for this

We regretfully advise that if we do not hear from you within this time frame, we will seek our clients further instructions as to the issue of proceedings or pass this matter to recovery agents who specialise in recovery payment in undisputed claims without any further notification to you.

OOH scary, scary-NOT!

I would love make an alternative proposal to RLP. Swivel!

they've never and there arent any recovery agents who would touch RLP claims with a barge pole

I just love their letters. They try to convince you that they have some power.

 

As for this

 

 

OOH scary, scary-NOT!

 

 

I would love make an alternative proposal to RLP. Swivel!

Thank you. See what they gonna say next!

I love the very start,

trying to make their begging letter look like it has some legal weight.

If that was actually true they wouldnt need to write without prejudice on it in the first place, they would want it used.

Again the last bit is laughable.

recovery agents for undisputed claims.

There is no such legal terms so no such comapny to act in that capacity.

they may as well write we reserve the right to break the law because you havent told us we cant and we have superpowers anyway

Hi.... I though this ended but it’s still going on....

Now I received a letter from Capital Resolve

It’s says Settlement offer

This is the letter:

We have been advised by our client that you have not responded to their previous request to pay the above amount and that your account continues to remain seriously overdue. We have now been appointed to attempt to resolve this matter prior to recommending to our client further action, witch may include recommending that litigation proceedings are commenced again you.

We recommend that you seek legal advice immediately if you are unsure about consequences and additional costs that may be added to the amount due if judgement it’s found in our clients favour. Please be aware that this could also affect your future ability to obtain credit.

Settlement offer: 112.13

Prior to potentially escalating this matter we have received authorisation from our client to accept a reduced figure of £112.13 in full and final settlement of the outstanding balance witch will end your liability and avoid any further action taken against you.

If you’re unable to pay the proposed amount, please call us on 01386719130 as we may be may be able to explore other possibilities based on your individual circumstances.

We have held your account for a further 7 days until 05 april 2018 however please be aware that no further reminders will be sent. If you do not contact us by this date, we may have no alternative but to continue with further action.

ignore the powerless DCA.

dx

You'll get a few of those over the course of a couple months. Ignore them all. There is no debt. So how can a dca chase something that never existed?

You'll get a few of those over the course of a couple months. Ignore them all. There is no debt. So how can a dca chase something that never existed?

Thank you.

ignore the powerless DCA.

 

dx

Thank you.

OOH! Capital Resolve. It seems that RLP have managed to find yet another debt collector to work with. I have forgotten how many different debt collectors RLP have used in the past few years mainly due to the fact that they get no joy whatsoever from the enlightened.

Many, many debt collectors have worked with RLP so it makes me wonder if when RLP try to pass on a case, most DCA's say 'NO' as (I believe) some of these companies work on a no win no fee basis.

Oh yes, Ignore as the others have said.

OOH! Capital Resolve. It seems that RLP have managed to find yet another debt collector to work with. I have forgotten how many different debt collectors RLP have used in the past few years mainly due to the fact that they get no joy whatsoever from the enlightened.

 

Many, many debt collectors have worked with RLP so it makes me wonder if when RLP try to pass on a case, most DCA's say 'NO' as (I believe) some of these companies work on a no win no fee basis.

 

Oh yes, Ignore as the others have said.

Most now know that they won't even recover the cost of postage!

Hi again! One question... would rpl letters and what happened would came up in a tourist visa application for USA?!

Thank you everyone for your help!!!

No

Read like threads

Hi again! One question... would rpl letters and what happened would came up in a tourist visa application for USA?!

 

Thank you everyone for your help!!!

WHy would it? RLP are NOTHING to do with UK law. And they NEVER will be. Infact various law enforcement agencies have told them to stop claiming they are associated with them.

Agreed. You should qualify for the visa waiver as you have no convictions to declare. If you had convictions for certain offences then you would have to apply to the US Embassy in London but certainly not for this.

WHy would it? RLP are NOTHING to do with UK law. And they NEVER will be. Infact various law enforcement agencies have told them to stop claiming they are associated with them.

RLP has a subsidiary company called Cireco that carries out 'integrity screening'. Jackie Lambert, the woman who controls RLP and Cireco, used to make much of it, warning people she accused, often sans evidence, of crimes, that (to misquote a famous U-boat captain) 'your name will also go on the list'. La Lambert used to grandly claim that employers used Cireco to check prospective employers. This may be true, but not many employers - according to Companies House records Cireco made less than £7k profit last year. Like so much of La Lambert's output, it's mostly bluff and bullsh*t.

Interestingly, Cireco's website does not contain the statutory information required by the Companies Act. It mentions the DPA, but not GDPR, which seems to me surprising for a company that is based upon processing personal data. But then, Cireco doesn't appear in the ICO database. So much for integrity, eh Jackie?

wich she always claims to know inside out.

nice little money earner RLP get out of these chainstores that sign up to the RLP walk of life.

rumour has it is +£35k per year

the police and Govt pass on certain "soft" intel so if you are a suspected drugs dealer you will find yourself on the first plane home again as soon as you touch down in the states.

What is not on that list is the imaginations of a person running a small private company about the morality of shoppers as no-one is interested, even if it were all provably true.