Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi I was being supplied my ovo after unknowingly being swapped from SSE.  My issues began when we had a smart meter fitted and our bills almost doubled overnight - we at the time assumed we were just paying not enough until then and just continued to pay the excess bills each. Month.    I would from time to time contact ovo and get faced with a call centre on South Africa of the most rude agents who would just hang up after hours of wait and I could not even get an acknowledgement of an issue with my meter.  At one point we were not in the property for like 4 months and the bills were coming just as high!  It was at this point I was sure something is not right and ovo only care to send bailiffs and started threatening us with a pay as you go meter despite me taking out a 3.5k loan to pay of my outstanding balance.  Around 1600 each on both gas and electricity.  This is where its gets really bad -  the very same day they sent me out a new bill saying the money paid already was only to cover up until the November previous and because its now Feb we owe another 1k.   By that August this had risen to over 3k and I still couldn't get anyone to even acknowledge a fault let alone fix it.    In despair I tried to swap suppliers and to my surprise octopus accepted us because even tho the debt is owed we are trying deal with.  During our time with them the bill was coming only on my wife's name as I was responsible for other bills and she this one - now that we owe them 3k they have magically started adding my name as well as my wife's to the same debt to apply double pressure and its showing on my experiwn report now with a question mark and 2700 showing in grey -  This was my wife's debt which we dispute we owe yet the have now sent me letter with both our names on from oriel and past due credit debt agencies - is this illegal and how can I get them to take my. Name of this and leave on wife's name as its so unfair they give us a both a defualt for wife's debt which we dispute anyway.    In the end about 3 weeks ago I wrote an email to their ceo and rishi sunak and low and behold for the first time in our history with ovo someone who spoke English contacted us and said she will look into our claim.    I explained to her that we feel our meter is faulty and despite me contacting them using WhatsApp email and phone I still have not got anyone to acknowledge a fault even. And that I dispute I Owe anything as my son was in hospital for 3 months and we stayed with him so house was empty and still. They were sending us super sized bills more than when we started at home.  She promised to investigate and a few days later replied that she is sorry for the poor customer service and offered us £50 compensation - however she also. Mentioned that she's attached statements for us confirming the payment for 3k I made was only up until Nov and in Feb despite me pay 3.5k nearly it's correct for them to bill. Me. Another £900 the very same day and she did not agree our meter was faulty and therfore the debt stands and she will not be calling it bcak from past due credit.  During my time with my new supplier post ovo, octopus I requested tehy check my. Meters because I felt they were faulty and over charging me and I got excellent response asking me for further details which I supplied and I got a. Response bcak within days to say my meter was indeed faulty and octopus have now remotely repaired it.   I then contacted the energy ombudsman and explained my situation how she at ovo tried to fob me off and demand I apy money we don't feel we owe due to faulty equipment we reported but ovo had to process or mechanism to deal with it or lodge complaint even without having to cc their ceo and our pm. And now I feel sick to think both husband and wife will get a 6  year default for debt which have a validity of a questionable nature.    I explained all this to the energy ombudsman and they accepted my case and I explained to them that my new supplier found my fault which ovo refueed to accept - I've uploaded the email from new supplier to ombudsman showing we had a fault.    My. Question is is there anything I can upload in defence of my case to ombudsman before they decide outcome ina few weeks    All advice greatly appreciated not only would I like advice on how to clear this debt but also how I can pursue ovo for compensation and deterrence for the future.  Thansk 
    • Thanks for the reply dubai 50 - if the statute is 10 years it has long passed - if it is 15 years i havea few months left. i shall ignore until it gets serious  An update - - I sent the letter to the bank in Dubai ( I did get delivery confirmation from Royal Mail)   - I have moved to a new address ( this is the address i gave to the bank in dubai)  - IDR are continuing to send Letters to the old address, which leads me to believe they are not in contact with the bank at all. - i have not replied to any correspondence digital or hard as they are non threatening ( as of yet).        
    • Your topic title was altered last June 23 by the owner of this forum in the interests of the forum Anyway well done on your result and concluding your topic, title updated.   Andy   .
    • So what    Why ? Consent Order/ Confidentiality ? This would be be invaluable to followers of your topic.  
    • Even on their map on their website, these parking rules encompass the whole pleasure park - there is no dedicated area for permits and another for free parking as stated. royal leisure park praking area map.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

2012 Ford Focus Transmission Control Module failure


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1596 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have a 2012 Ford Focus that broke down 8 days after the extended Warranty on the Transmission Control Module (TCM) ran out.

 

The local Ford dealer requested that it be treated as a warranty repair but Ford declined.

The garage has asked me to contact Ford direct.

 

From my research the TCM for the 2012 Focus is a long standing and known Ford issue.

In Australia the warranty extension was to 7 years and in the US, the warranty extension was to 10 years. In the UK it is 5 years.

 

Apart from facing a bill of £600 plus,

it is particularly frustrating in that:

1. The car was serviced by my local Ford garage in August (which would have been within the 5 year warranty) and when I took the car in I did request that they investigate a juddering issue.

 

The service desk took notes of the various things that i had asked to be done but apparently this particular issue was not logged.

 

I therefore have no physical evidence that the juddering which is a classic symptom of a TCM issue occurred during the warranty period

(I do have a word doc in which i made notes about what i wanted doing, the properties of which show the date of 4th August, but this is not being taking into account).

 

2. The local garage did actually phone to tell me that the repair would be done under warranty. They are not disputing that they told me this. However, when it came to processing the paperwork, they then informed me that it wasn't a warranty repair.

 

3. the car was given a software update for the gearbox in 2016 and 2017 services which I understand was to help with juddering on gear changes.

 

So my questions:

a. Do I have a case for requesting from Ford that the repair is considered a Goodwill out of warranty gesture? The car has a full ford service history.

 

b. Do i have any case for making a complaint to the local dealer who wrongly informed me that the repair would be covered?

 

c. Is there any way to prove the legality of the word document that contains my notes from the service. It was created and saved on 4th August, on the day I made the appt for the car to be serviced?

 

Forgot to say that the local garage has been helpful albeit not in actually getting the repair accepted under warranty. They have given me a loan car as the repair is now into its 6th week.

 

Another additional note.

If this was a regular consumer item like a tap or a TV then I would go down the 1973 sale of goods act that the goods need to be fit for purpose and that there would be a reasonable expectation that the TCM unit would have a longer lifespan than 5 years,

 

in effect there is an implied warranty but it appears from my research so far that the car manufacturers don't back down when this is put to them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a Fiesta 2012 model auto gearbox with the same shuddering problem.Like your self done a lot of research and as you have found the USA have had replacement parts and warranty extended to 10 years.I think in Australia there is a legal challenge being made against Ford over the fact there has not been a recall and free replacement box.I have emailed Ford UK and so far they have responded just to get Reg Number and name and address, still waiting for next response.This is a worldwide problem on Fiesta and Focus Auto gearboxes.How the hell they have got away without a recall in the UK I am not sure.Will keep pursuing Ford...GOOD LUCK

FS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi FS,

I spoke to Ford customer service yesterday and they can see where the local garage has raised a warranty case which was declined and closed.

 

The escalation path I have been given is to write to customer services with any additional details, which they will link with the original case, and then they'll get back to me.

 

I've given them the full sorry details, including what I consider to be poor service from the original ford garage.

 

I think what is frustrating is that it is a known issue that is getting treated differently in Australia and USA where the extended warranty is longer.

 

I accept that local markets and local conditions may differ but fundamentally, we all have the same issue with the TCM failing.

 

In fact, I couldn't find any information about the length of the warranty for the UK market, until I was told my repair wasn't covered.

 

Another question for anyone in the know

- when I booked the car in for the service,

should the local garage have told me that there was an extended warranty on the TCM part?

 

They would see this instantly after inputting the VIN onto Ford's own servicing website Ford Etis.

 

If the local garage had notified me about the TCM warranty,

then I would have linked this to the juddering issue.

 

They only mentioned the software update on the gearbox which I see from other forums, is step 1 and 2 that Ford go through before replacing seals (step 3) and then the TCM (Step 4) for people reporting issues.

 

Good luck with your case

- did you email customer services or have you escalated further?

 

Hi FS - how long ago did you email Ford, do you have any indication as to their service standards for getting back to you?

Link to post
Share on other sites

rob667 emailed them just a few days ago,

 

got a quick response but only to ask Reg,

name address etc and how they could contact me,

 

I sent a reply,

NOW it's all gone quiet,

which I suspected it would.

 

Will keep in touch as things happen IF ANYTHING

 

good luck FS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, I'm here :-)

Just waiting for you to arrive :madgrin:

 

I'm good, but not even the mighty Hamster can change Ford policy.

 

The two case's are with Ford CS. Proof of failure whilst covered under the warranty extension would help but it doesn't look like they have it.

 

Not much to be done now.

 

H

44 years at the pointy end of the motor trade. :eek:

GARUDALINUX.ORG

Garuda Linux comes with a variety of desktop environments like KDE, GNOME, Cinnamon, XFCE, LXQt-kwin, Wayfire, Qtile, i3wm and Sway to choose from.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ford CS rejected a gesture of goodwill repair out of hand citing the fact that the car was considerably outside of the 3 year warranty period.

 

They conveniently ignored the fact that the car was 8 days outside of the extended warranty period so am writing back to Ford CS. The car has full Ford main dealer SH and I have been a loyal Ford customer in the past.

 

Hammy - is there anything else I can mention that might influence Ford CS? Have you come across anyone that has successfully argued for a goodwill out of warranty repair?

 

Does threatening to raise a fuss on social media, the press make any difference?

 

I believe the Sunday Times recently ran a story on warranty/out of warranty repairs judging by the two letters that appeared in the 30th Oct issue from readers that had successfully argued for a goodwill repair, albeit these were not with Ford.

 

Hi FS - have you had a response yet?

 

 

I had to phone as they didn't reply to the email I sent within the 3 days turnaround that they aim to provide.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got an insulting email today,they have NO KNOWLEDGE of any problems with the automatic gearbox on my vehicle if there was then a recall would be in place, further anything I have read on the internet,they cannot comment on.

My reply as you can imagine was just short of Furious

 

fs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whoa everybody, clarification needed. Which i'm trying to get.

 

More than one type of gearbox\clutch fitted to '2012' Fiesta!!

 

H

44 years at the pointy end of the motor trade. :eek:

GARUDALINUX.ORG

Garuda Linux comes with a variety of desktop environments like KDE, GNOME, Cinnamon, XFCE, LXQt-kwin, Wayfire, Qtile, i3wm and Sway to choose from.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

we don't have lawyers in the uk.

 

please don't use a no win no fee fleecer

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It does look like a situation where it would need someone to take up the legal case and then get others affected behind it which is what happened in the US and Australia with class action lawsuits against Ford - hence the longer extended warranty and greater level of support that ford offer in those countries However, I'm going to continue going through the Cust Services route until the case has been suitably escalated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got an insulting email today,they have NO KNOWLEDGE of any problems with the automatic gearbox on my vehicle if there was then a recall would be in place, further anything I have read on the internet,they cannot comment on.

My reply as you can imagine was just short of Furious

 

fs

 

This model Fiesta has what I would call a traditional, hydraulic, automatic gearbox. It is the models after which have powershift. The clutch is automatic, powered and dual, the gearbox is traditional (more or less).

 

The gearbox is a traditional synchromesh gearbox with 'powershift' dual clutch. It is the dual clutch in the powershift which can cause issues. This Fiesta does not have this.

 

It might be juddering, it might be the gearbox, but based on the information I have it is not the dual clutch problem, it is something unconnected.

 

Which is why Ford Customer Services have come back to you and said there are no recalls or issues relating to your vehicle because the issues affecting your vehicle are not as a result of the dual clutch issue. There is never any intention to insult.

 

I would suggest getting a diagnosis at a local automatic transmission specialist. Unfortunately this will be chargeable as the recall etc. relates to a different type of gearbox.

 

H

44 years at the pointy end of the motor trade. :eek:

GARUDALINUX.ORG

Garuda Linux comes with a variety of desktop environments like KDE, GNOME, Cinnamon, XFCE, LXQt-kwin, Wayfire, Qtile, i3wm and Sway to choose from.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This thread now seems to have two OP's (Oximoron I know) The original, Robmiller667 has a 2012 FOCUS. THe second, firstship, is the one with the 2012 FIESTA. This is very confusing for anyone viewing. For clarity could site team split and create new thread with relevant posts attached?

My time as a Police Officer and subsequently time working within the Motor Trade gives me certain insights into the problems that consumers may encounter.

I have no legal qualifications.

If you have found my post helpful, please enhance my reputation by clicking on the Heart. Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Standard auto generated email response from CS in response to my request for a written reply to my original email to customer services. So far only had the verbal comment as mentioned in the post above that it was outside of the warranty. Apparently in their email response there will be details of how I can escalate further as they refused to do that on the phone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I have a 2012 Ford Focus with the dual clutch transmission , had the clutch pack replaced June 2017 as was still within warranty , done considerable less miles in the past just under 2 years and yet again the clutch has gone but apparently the part they used to fix only comes with a years warranty so basically they are saying here is a fix for the clutch problem but oh wait it’s not actually fixed but sorry your out of warranty now !! Just waiting to get my car back today to confirm it is clutch judder (which it so definitely is) and then I’m going to crest hell with Ford CS and if I get no luck small claims court and further actions until my car is properly fixed !! Any update from any of you on what CS has said ?? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...