Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I can only speak from personal experience. But a similar thing happened to me. Seriously dented door.  I made the other insurance pay. They regarded it as a write off. Took the money, replaced the door. Never heard anything more about it.    Except clearly someone sold my details to claims company, because I got loads of calls in bad English for a few month's 
    • The incident was 03rd March 2024 - and that was the only letter that I have received from MET 15th April 2024 The charge I paid was at the Stansted Airport exit gate (No real relevance now - I thought this charge was for that!!).   Here is the content of email to them (Yes I know I said I was the driver !!!!) as said above -  I thought this charge was for that!! "Stansted Airport" Dear “To whom it may concern” My name is ??  PCN:  ?? Veh Reg: Date of Incident: 03rd March 2024 I have just received a parking charge final reminder letter, dated 10th April 2024 - for an overstay.  This is the first to my knowledge of any overstay. I am aware that I am out of the 28 days, I don’t mean to be rude, this feels like it is a scam My movements on this day in question are, I pulled into what looked like a service station on my way to pick my daughter and family up from Stansted airport. The reason for me pulling into this area was to use a toilet, so I found Starbucks, and when into there, after the above, I then purchased a coffee. After which I then continued with my journey to pick my daughter up. (however after I sent this email I remember that Starbucks was closed so I then I walked over to Macdonalds) There was no signs about parking or any tickets machines to explains about the parking rules. Once at Stansted, I entered and then paid on exit.  So Im not show where I overstayed my welcome.. With gratitude    
    • Just to enlarge on Dave's great rundown of your case under Penalty. In the oft quoted case often seen on PCNs,  viz PE v Beavis while to Judges said there was a case for claiming that £100 was a penalty, this was overruled in this case because PE had a legitimate interest in keeping the car park free for other motorists which outweighed the penalty. Here there is no legitimate interest since the premises were closed. Therefore the charge is a penalty and the case should be thrown out for that reason alone.   The Appeals dept need informing about what and what isn't a valid PCN. Dummies. You should also mention that you were unable to pay by Iphone as there was no internet connection and there was a long  queue to pay on a very busy day . There was no facility for us to pay from the time of our arrival only the time from when we paid at the machine so we felt that was a bit of a scam since we were not parked until we paid. On top of that we had two children to load and unload in the car which should be taken into account since Consideration periods and Grace periods are minimum time. If you weren't the driver and PoFA isn't compliant you are off scot free since only the driver is liable and they are saying it was you. 
    • Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MMF/Moriarty backdoor PDL CCJ - Issued Court Papers To Wrong Address


jakedancer
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1888 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

 

I am new here but I have been told I might be able to get some help.

 

I received a judgement in default letter from the County Court Business Centre a few days ago which came as a shock.

I know the importance of replying to any claim issued against me.

 

This is in relation to a pay day loan debt from 4 years ago, which has now been bought by Motormile Finance UK Ltd.

I paid some of the debt off then missed a payment, then they increased it massively and I couldn't keep up.

 

I moved on and heard nothing for many years until I get this judgement letter from the court.

When I phoned Moriarty Law, the firm representing the Claimant,

they told me they issued to my former address.

 

They realised their mistake and then sent a copy to my new address.

I received this but thought it was a scare tactic as it had not come from a court, and I would assume I would receive court papers from a court!

 

When I asked them why they didn't inform the court they became ambiguous and I didn't understand what they were talking about.

 

I have been told to set the judgement asside which is what I will do.

 

I am currently on ESA so apparently I do not have to pay a court fee which is a great relief.

 

However,

I need to know is it now too late to start the 3 letter process?

Or should I get on to this straight away so that if the judgement is set aside I will get my chance to defend the claim?

 

In anticipation of your help,

 

Jake

Link to post
Share on other sites

No 3 letter process. That is not what is advised on this site.

 

If this claimant creditor had your current correct address from you, before they issued the court claim, you can apply to set aside the CCJ, by completing the court forms including fee waiver. However, you really need to state a reason for defence, as to why the amount claimed is wrong or there is another issue. The set aside just means that the claim goes back to where it was before default judgement and the claimant can proceed to argue their claim.

 

Suggest you contact Northampton county court bulk centre by phone or email asking for the court claim details. You need to know the particulars of claim that were stated. The telephone number for the court is held in the bulk centre autolink if you click on it.

 

Once you have the details come back here.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Thanks for your response. However, I'm sure I have seen elsewhere on your site people advocating the principles of the 3 letter process. As you point out if I'm successful in setting the judgement asside the court process starts again, and the 3 letter principles would form the basis of my defence, would it not?

 

Thanks,

 

Jake

Link to post
Share on other sites

What 3 letters ? That sounds like a debt avoidance strategy from years ago that is still advised by other sites that think debt can be avoided by sending letters. If the debt account was taken out before Aoril 2007, the creditor needs the original CCA, so a CCA request would work in that situation.

 

No magic 3 letter process.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

No you havent. The DCA likely laughed at you and said screw it . If the value of the debt was high enough, they would go straight to court and youd be stuck.

 

Please stay away from freeman of the land advice, as it wont work in the real world and will through you in much deeper trouble.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you moved and did not tell your creditors then MMF quite legally filed the claim and got a default judgement using your old address

- there is nothing you can do about it

unless you can prove

with written evidence

that you told the original creditor or the debt buyers your new address.

 

as for the 3 letter process...FMOTL TWADDLE.

it only probably appeared to have worked before because there was another reason that made them run.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

but not because of the 3 letter fmotl process

you are talking about the FMOTL process yes

 

or do you mean some other 3 letters

where did you get them from?

 

anyway...

 

whats the date of the CCJ

and is this on your credit file?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

and just to clarify an earlier enquiry..

no whatever you do [requesting paperwork etc] is not a defence to the debt

to go with any set aside reason [if you had one..which you don't appear to anyway - costs £255 ]

 

the fact default judgement has been attained and you have already gotten a CCJ

trumps the need for them to now hold any enforceable paperwork.

 

if the CCJ date is within 28 days of today then it might be cheaper for you to simply settle it quickly

then the CCJ wont get registered.

 

another sad example of running away from debt and not informing your creditors you've moved

 

as this is a PDL have you looked at the whole picture?

as if you already had defaults or numerous PDL's already

you might be able to hit the original creditor with an irresponsible lending claim

that might be a way out and get things nulled

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are both incorrect. It went to court and thankfully as I had used the 3 letter process I had a valid defence which I submitted, based on the 3 letters principles. The Claimants desisted.

 

Try that with a legit debt. Not a bogus one with a bottom dwelling DCA.

 

But lets leave all that aside.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Well all I can say is that I used the 3 letter process once before, the case went to court and I submitted my defence based on the 3 letter process and then the Claimant's desisted. It was not a win in the true sense no, but it made the other side go away and no judgement was registered against me.

 

I know that at some stage the debt has been purchased by Motormile Finance UK Ltd (MMF). It was originally a pay day loan. On Friday I phoned Moriarty Law who stated that they received the original debt as £200, but that was what I originally borrowed and I made payments on that. All I know is that within 4 months the debt was at £700 and I just could not keep up.

 

My landlord at the time then asked us all to leave the house as he was returning to do it up and sell it, so we all had to move on and I left the debt with that house. I was in no hurry to give the creditors my new address after their awful attitude and customer service, and I needed time to sort my finances out which were in a horrendous state. During the last few years I have managed to sort my finances and have managed to avoid a County Court Judgement, up until now.

 

Jake

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your next step is to get hold of the court claim details, to see what the claimant stated. Find reasons for a set aside, other than the address issue.

 

If you have any other debts, make sure creditors have your latest address.

 

In regard to the 3 letter process, that does not really work anymore and tactics in defending a debt depend on when the original account was taken out. Better to look at each debt and come up with a tailored strategy, rather than thinking one 3 letter process is effective in every case. Just as a warning, the owner of one ' debt avoidance' site that still advocates the 3 letter process has just ended up with a huge debt they can't pay. How many people follow doubtful advice and end up in a worse position ?

 

Just look at the financial legal page on CAG and see how many successful outcomes have been achieved by people.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

whats the date of the CCJ

and is this on your credit file?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well it shouldn't be registered yet really its within 28 days

 

if you pay it it will vanish

 

twill be cheaper than a £255 set aside which you don't appear to have a reason for.

 

then argue IL after with the OC

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I've moved a post on your recent thread here to conclude this

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I'm pleased to say that on submission of an N244 and having the judgement set aside, the other side reduced the debt by 45% and I avoided a country court judgement.

 

Jake

 

So you paid 55% of the claim ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...