Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi I received a Parking Charge letter to keeper on Monday 15/04/24, the 17th day after the alleged incident. My understanding is that this is outside the window for notifying. The issue date was 08/04/2024 which should have been in good time for it to have arrived within the notice period but in fact it actually arrived at lunchtime on the 15th. Do I have to prove when it arrived  (and if so how can I do that?) or is the onus on them to prove it was delivered in time? All I can find is that delivery is assumed to be on the second working day after issue which would have been Weds 10//04/24 but it was actually delivered 5 days later than that (thank you Royal Mail!). My husband was present when it arrived - is a family member witness considered sufficient proof? 1 Date of the infringement  arr 28/03/24 21:00, dep 29/03/24 01.27 2 Date on the NTK  08/04/2024 (Date of Issue) 3 Date received Monday 15/04/24 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012?  Yes 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No    Have you had a response?  n/a 7 Who is the parking company? GroupNexus 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Petrol Station Roadchef Tibshelf South DE55 5T 'operating in accordance with the BPA's Code of Practice'  
    • lookinforinfo - many thanks for your reply. It would be very interesting to get the letter of discontinuance. The court receptionist said that the county court was in Gloucester 'today' so that makes me think that some days it is in Gloucester and some days its in Cheltenham, it was maybe changed by the courts and i was never informed, who knows if DCBL were or not. My costs were a gallon of petrol and £3.40 for parking. I certainly don't want to end up in court again that's for sure but never say never lol. Its utterly disgusting the way these crooks can legally treat motorists but that's the uk for you. I'm originally from Scotland so it's good that they are not enforceable there but they certainly still try to get money out of you. I have to admit i have lost count of the pcn's i have received in the last 2 yr and 4 months since coming to England for work, most of them stop bothering you on their own eventually, it was just this one that they took it all the way. Like i mentioned in my WS the the likes of Aldi and other companies can get them cancelled but Mcdonalds refused to help me despite me being a very good customer.   brassednecked - many thanks   honeybee - many thanks   nicky boy - many thanks    
    • Huh? This is nothing about paying just for what I use - I currently prefer the averaged monthly payment - else i wouldn't be in credit month after month - which I am comfortable with - else I wold simply request a part refund - which I  would have done if they hadn't reduced my monthly dd after the complaint I raised (handled slowly and rather badly) highlighted the errors in their systems (one of which they do seem to have fixed) Are you not aware DD is always potentially variable? ah well, look it up - but my deal is a supposed to average the payments over a year, and i dont expect them to change payments (up or down) without my informed agreement ESPECIALLY when I'm in credit over winter.   You are happy with your smart meter - jolly for you I dont want one, dont have to have one  - so wont   I have a box that tells me my electricity usage - was free donkeys years ago and shows me everything I need to know just like a smart meter but doesnt need a smart meter,  and i can manually set my charges - so as a side effect - would show me if the charges from the supplier were mismatched. Doesn't tell me if the meters actually calibrated correctly - but neither does your smart meter. That all relies on a label and the competence of the testers - and the competence of any remote fiddling with the settings. You seem happy with that - thats fine. I'm not.    
    • Evening all,   So today, I was sent an updated offer that includes the £12.60 I spent on letters, but they have declined to add the interest at £7.40. They have stating 'We acknowledge your request to claim interest to date, however, this would be at the discretion of a trial judge if the claim did proceed to a trial hearing.' I think I am content with this outcome, and pushing this to a trial for a total interest of £15.30 throughout the claim does not make sense to me.   What are people's thoughts? I am sure our courts have better things to concentrate on?
    • FFRSG3424ListofEvidencepdf-V1 2-merged.pdfFFRSG3424ListofEvidencepdf-V1 2-merged.pdf 2pages T&C,s UCM
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Final Demand Joint Loan Account following Bankruptcy


Mr Man 69
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2340 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello, I was recommended to post on this site and time is also not on my side! I appreciate any input and advice, thank you :)

 

a) I went insolvent in September

- since the date,

I went to the HSBC branch with my wife to remove my name from the joint account and sign over responsibility to my wife as a sole account holder (including overdraft £900 and joint consolidation loan £326p/m on 18k).

 

She did IE sheets and was telephoned across, approved, and we signed.

The joint loan was part of my bankruptcy

I understood it that my wife would take responsibility of that, hence going to branch and doing this.

 

b) Since then, she was issued a final demand notice out of the blue, claiming default on arrears (there are no arrears, never have been) and 18 days to settle balance in full (£18k). No mention of any BR, just a final demand which is inaccurate in it's detail for the reasoning - and as it transpires, resolving it.

 

c) 3 days of calls, and about 5 hours of speaking and on hold between departments because nobody seemed to know what was going on,

we were told by the Financial Guidance Team to do nothing,

let it ride out as they needed to charge off the account because of my bankruptcy

- they'd even refund the latest payment which was automatically made after this demand letter.

But doing this, of course would result in a default marker for my wife.

and the recovery department would be in touch to collect the debt.

 

Not knowing who to believe,

I was passed to the 'insolvency team' who told us that my wife must get back in touch with the Financial Guidance Team,

do a I/E and set up a repayment agreement BEFORE the 18 days.

 

Needing clarity, and being frustrated at being told different things between departments

(as well as being emotionally crushed, not to mention the psychological damage of listening to that HSBC hold music),

we went to branch to have someone work with us to resolve.

 

She made a call to the department on the final demand letter,

who also said - get in touch with the Financial Guidance Team to do an I/E and set up a payment plan,

if she does that then the default will not be passed to the CRAs.

She put us in a room to make a call to the Financial Guidance Team,

but then the whole fiasco started again...

 

d) The Financial Guidance Team are adamant that they will not allow a payment plan.

One guy we dealt with even went through a I/E with my wife but then came back after speaking to his manager, sorry, actually, that this isn't possible.

 

I have spoken to the Manager who also insisted that it simply is not possible to set up a plan because of my bankruptcy, the account needs to be charged off. Period.

I have argued that this goes against the terms of the loan in that she has not had the opportunity (actually denied!) to resolve this and she is being forced into default unfairly.

 

The original contract has a clause about calling in the loan if bankruptcy happens to any party,

but there is a line also that states that such action won't happen without notice and an opportunity to resolve,

which is what I believe is being blatantly breached here.

 

The manager raised a complaint for me

- I have the reference number and intend to follow this up with my version not knowing what the complaint that he has raised references.

 

Even after I spoke to the manager (who I suspected had either got this very wrong or has is own agenda),

I asked to get put through again to the insolvency team again,

who again stated the same - 'speak to the Financial Guidance Team' and get it sorted before the 18-days! Stalemate.

 

My final call with the Financial Guidance Team yesterday,

I spoke to a very nice woman who looked into everything and took it upon herself to speak between departments, not me, and get back to me.

 

Her news: anyone who has told me that you could set up a payment plan is incorrect and has probably not understood that the final demand was generated because of my insolvency (even though the final demand says nothing of the sort - it even gives a reason it has been sent which is due to previous notice of arrears [not true])..

 

. the insolvency team I was repeatedly passed to was the 'wrong one' based in India, not in Birmingham...

and apologies for the mix up but 100% we cannot set up a payment plan,

the account needs to be charged off and your wife will have to speak to the recoveries people after.

 

e) So what now!!?

 

For our efforts, we are totally unable to resolve this through a payment plan, it's 18K or default.

 

I have a complain reference number.

 

They say that expect about 4 weeks for a reply to the complaint but maybe up to 8.

I understand that I cannot do anything with the Financial Ombudsman until I have a reply (or 8 weeks).

 

To recap

- my issue is that my wife is being forced unfairly into default with every effort and the ability to repay with amounts of the original agreement.

a black mark on her credit reference with a default.

Plus, we have no idea even if there is no escape from this situation,

what demands will be placed by the recovery department (i.e. currently the loan is 60 months at £326 p/m).

But then, if my wife has a black mark anyway,

what options are there for her to make a reduced offer or anything of that nature?

We're in territory that we didn't expect and don't really understand.

 

Perhaps naively, we expected the burden of the joint loan to simply fall on my wife, not being called in with a £18k demand.

 

I'm also unsure what to do in the interim

- if I'm raising a complaint, do we get any period of grace here

- do we commit to whatever collections dept gets in touch after, or hold them off?

 

Any help is very very very appreciated - our 18 days is up on 3rd Nov, and we've wasted a week speaking to them on the phone and getting absolutely nowhere!

 

Thank you :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The loan should simply continue as before with your wife making monthly payments, there should be no question of "setting up a repayment plan". The shocker is HSBC refunding the latest payment putting her into default. Hopefully someone will be along soon to help, in meantime her credit file will be affected by financial association with you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Any feedback/input on this would still be most welcome. The only update is that HSBC today replied to MY complaint, essentially confirming that that they're following protocol by closing the loan account with a final demand and it going to default for my wife. Thanks :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bankruptcy on a joint debt.

You have forcibly changed the original contract with the bank and the bank can and do ask for the amount to be paid in full. Its a breach of contract. 2 people liable, now the contract is changed without their permission. = loan reacalled.

Whoever set up your bankruptcy should of explained this too you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The contract being breached as I understood it should result in a default notice - and the breach being remedied by my wife with a continuation of payments as per the contract of our loan that clearly states in a situation of Bankruptcy (amongst other situations) that 1) advanced notice should be given and 2) opportunity to fix. i.e. a breach can be remedied by either party (obviously not me).

 

This went straight to final demand - and that letter mentioned nothing of the bankruptcy and contained wrong information about arrears not being dealt despite previous letters (which totally isn't the case). And if the loan is to be recalled, I don't get why HSBC are continuing to take monthly payments (2 now)?

 

I have had so many people in the 'know' tell me that my wife should simply continue.

 

Quote from another forum:

"As clearly your wife cannot pay in full, then she needs to continue to pay the contractual payments on time and needs to take the complaint forward.

If what HSBC are saying were true, we would have seen it on this forum many times - and in my job role my 14 debt adviser colleagues and myself would have seen it also - but never have...I believe that they should have issued a default notice."

 

Does your experience sgtbush tell you otherwise?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...