Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx  
    • Well tbh that’s good news and something she can find out for herself.  She has no intention of peace.  I’m going to ask the thread stays open a little longer.   It seems she had not learned that I am just not the one!!!!  plus I have received new medical info from my vet today.   To remain within agreement, I need to generally ask for advice re:  If new medical information for the pup became apparent now - post agreement signing, that added proof a second genetic disease (tested for in those initial tests in the first case but relayed incorrectly to me then ), does it give me grounds for asking a court to unseal the deed so I can pursue this new info….. if she persists in being a pain ? If generally speaking, a first case was a cardiac issue that can be argued as both genetic and congenital until a genetic test is done and then a second absolute genetic only disease was then discovered, is that deemed a new case or grounds for unsealing? Make sense ?   This disease is only ever genetic!!!!   Rather more damning and indisputable proof of genetic disease breeding with no screening yk prevent.   The vet report showing this was uploaded in the original N1 pack.   Somehow rekeyed as normal when I was called with the results.   A vet visit today shows they were not normal and every symptom he has had reported in all reports uploaded from day one are related to the disease. 
    • Hi Roberto, Read some of the other threads here about S Sixes - they all follow the same routine of threats, threats, then nothing. When you do this, you'll see how many have been in exactly the same situation as you are. Keep us updated as necessary .............
    • Nationwide's takeover of Virgin Money is hitting the headlines as thousands of customers protest that they will not get a vote on whether it should happen.View the full article
    • unrelated to the agreement then, could have come from Lowells filing cabinet (who lowells - they dont do that - oh yes they do!! just look at a few lowell paypal EU court claim threads) no name and address for time of take out either which they MUST contain. just like the rest of the agreement then..utter bogroll that proves nothing toward you ... slippery lowells as usual it's only a case management discussion on 26 April 2024 at 10:00am by WebEx. thats good simply refer to the responses you made on your 4a form response only. pleanty of SPC thread here to read before the 26th i suggest you read at least one a day. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

NatWest CRA markers***Resolved***


fredsed
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2152 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This late payment marker business gets more bizarre by the day.

 

I sent the email to the CEO of NatWest-

as yet no reply

but to be honest I wasn’t expecting one

but it was worth a go.

 

I had a letter today from Noddle with the response from NatWest saying they won’t remove the data despite assurances from NatWest that they would delete this data.

 

I now have my latest Clear Score report at its showing a new NAtWest loan account with two missed payments in September and October this year!!!

 

all four CRA are showing a different record!!!

 

I have contacted the FOS and explained the situation and they say they will contact NatWest for an explanation as they seem unwilling to give one directly to me.

 

Do creditors ever report payments made against a CCJ to CRA’s?

(I can’t find anything on the web that suggest they do)

 

The CCJ was secured against the personal loan these markers relate to and an overdraft (they were in the same claim).

 

Would any payments made in lieu of the CCJ show on my credit file after the default dropped off my file?..

 

if yes this wouldn’t explain why Experian in showing it as 3 late payments dating back 70+ months!!

 

If it all wasn’t so stressful I might find it funny!

Link to post
Share on other sites

These late Payment markers refer to a Loan account that defaulted in September 2011 and was recorded as such. The default markers subsequently fell off as expected in September. It is now showing as a solitary 3 late payments maker on Noddle and Equifax but Experian is reporting it as a late payment dating back 72 months. I have started a thread for this here

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?482548-NatWest-CRA-markers&p=5078332#post5078332

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone know if a creditor is a liberty to place markers on your credit report that relate to a CCJ once the original default has dropped off the credit report?

 

My understanding from what I’ve read is that a creditor can only apply for a judgement if an account has been defaulted.

 

as the default will pre date the judgment

the judgement will remain on credit file until it 6th birthday.

 

However any payments made in respect of the judgement may show as payment toward the outstanding balance so will these payment still be recorded once the 6+ years from DF have elapsed?

 

Are payments made toward a CCJ in principle a new account?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Payments to a Judgment are not connected to a default or CRAs

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Finally sorted (well almost),

I received an email yesterday from the FOS stating that NatWest have admitted that the markers are incorrect and that they will go ahead and deleted my file... YAY!!!

 

They have also offered me £100 compensation.

 

They say it can take up to 6 week to be cleared from my CF.

 

Considering the huge effort this has taken in time and sleepless nights I think 100 quid is a bit low but hey the most important thing is that these markers are removed, so I’m nearly there.

 

By the way the woman at the FOS who has been handling my case has been excellent and the whole experience became far less stressful once they were involved.

 

What is most frustrating is that it really shouldn’t have been this difficult and had the action promised in the 1st instance been taken this issue could have been resolved weeks ago!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done ..thread title amended.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Hi, I received a letter from my good friends NatWest (remediation team) re a Loan that defaulted sometime in 2012. Along with a defaulted overdraft it was secured by them with a CCJ. Unfortunately this happened before I discovered this site as a sar revealed they had no paper work for either but never mind the CCJ drops off my credit file later this year.

Right back to this letter. They state that as they didn't send me NOSIA statements for a year the owe me the princely sum of £34.44 in interest i shouldn't have been charged. This money they are very kindly going to use to pay down my dept. You've got to love em. So my question is, should they have added interest to this and should I do anything about it if so.

You good advice ill be most welcome as ever.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Id be very wary of this just in case I could restart the clock.

I dont think it does because its the lender re ajusting the debt, but you know the little cherubs do underhanded things.

Others will have more knowledge

Link to post
Share on other sites

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy,

I'm still a bit confused as to why after securing a judgment on the loan they now after 6 years would bother to check there records! I smell a rat.

 

I have had no end of issues with NatWest over the years.

I am paying the CCJ as the court ordered and as it drops off my credit file at the end of this year so I certainly don't wan't to do anything to re set the clock!

 

I've already had a fight with them last year over late payment markers that shouldn't have been on my credit file. But I've always followed your advice and it's worked for me so far.

 

I'm just sorry I didn't know about you guys when this all kicked off, from what I've read and discovered since there's a pretty good chance I could have defended this.

 

The CCJ and subsequent incorrect reporting of data has had a hugely detrimental effect on my life.

 

Can I claim interest on this money or am I best off leaving it well alone?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its all connected to the CCA2006 amendments..irrespective of whether the debt is a judgment or not..the creditor must issue a NOSIA....if not they are prevented from charging interest...hence the credit.

 

Given the fact that your debt is subject to a Judgment its irrelevant anyway...you cant claim interest...and there is nothing to reset...your making payments as per the judgment.

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...