Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot reply to CCA request over barclays loan


Robbo3577
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2243 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

so tough luck for them

until/unless an enforceable agreement from them appears ...no payments..write nothing more to them

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

OK guys - I think I have some great news, do not wish to celebrate until you people can confirm.

 

I have finally received my paperwork from Barclays re SAR - hundreds of pages and NOT a single agreement anywhere - re this loan - I only have the INITIAL offer letter, now the exciting bit.

 

due to being at work I am unable to post a copy of the account notes and account changes (1page),

however, it shows new status of 'Debt Sale Account' where old status was Agency write off

- I presume that is when they sold it to Crapbot, it looks like it has gone through various stages DCA Case Closure, D.C.A. Write Off Prime

 

on the account notes - I see an entry from 06/11/17 - it reads as follows:

 

debt sale customer requesting for agreement - due to age of account, unable to provide the details

 

I presume this is crapbot asking for copy of agreement in response to my CCA to them, they have already told me they do not have it and will reach out to OC.

 

I now believe - this debt is totally UNENFORCEABLE

 

please confirm my next actions

 

1. file all paperwork and wait 6 years for SB

2. ignore future correspondence from Crapbot

3. make donation for all the help and advice you have provided

4. have a drink to celebrate :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

What month in 2007 did you take the agreement and when was it live ? If its pre April then 1-4 above apply if post April then they could always knock up a reconstituted version of the agreement .

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?472962-DMP-with-Fee-Paying-Gregory-Pennington-DMC-looking-for-alternative./page3

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Andyorch - I will post exact details of loan date tomorrow (at work ATM)

 

Maybe I misunderstood but thought that under the pre action protocol reconstituted version was no longer allowed,

 

section 2 - 3.1 - a - iv - where the debt arises from a written agreement, the date of the agreement, the parties to it and the fact that a copy of the written agreement can be requested from the creditor.

 

if DCA does not have copy of the agreement, how can they prove one even existed or what date it was taken out.

 

am now worried crapbot may be planning something as also on the notepage that I have -0711/17 (one day after requesting agreement) there is a note saying - debt sale - mail recd from colleague stating please confirm total amount paid to you by the customer, replied total amount paid by the customer was £***.**

 

I guess my celebration is on hold for a bit :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

" Maybe I misunderstood but thought that under the pre action protocol reconstituted version was no longer allowed,

 

section 2 - 3.1 - a - iv - where the debt arises from a written agreement, the date of the agreement, the parties to it and the fact that a copy of the written agreement can be requested from the creditor."

 

Not true a reconstituted will suffice providing its accurate and a true copy and your agreement was post April 2007...pre April they will require the original.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

by accurate - I assume they need the exact date it was taken out, the interest rate applied at the time and the actual type of loan, I will need to re read the offer letters when I get home, but have noticed a couple of strange things, ie, interest and the type of loan.

 

 

will revert tomorrow

 

 

thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

It must be mirror like...even down to your address at the time of inception

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Loan was agreed post Apr, am I correct in saying that Barclays are not allowed to send my personal correspondence to Crapbot, ie a copy of the initial offer letter, without the details stated in the offer letter and no agreement,

 

I do not see how anyone can reconstitute an agreement without knowing the exact amount, interest rate or agreed terms for payment.

 

is it worth sending a letter to Crapbot advising they have not complied fully with my CCA and I now consider this debt unenforceable and closed ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nahhhh...sit tight and see if they issue a claim......then fight...forearmed is forewarned.

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was re-reading my correspondence over the weekend and have a further question around DCA reconstituting CCA.

 

the original response from cabot in response to my CCA request, clearly informs me that they do not have this information on file and they have to request copy of credit agreement, statement of account and original and varied T&C from original lender.

 

as mentioned above - the SAR I have from Barclays clearly states they had a request from DCA (6th Nov 17) which they advised unable to comply as no information on file as an old account.

 

surely due to the above, if they reconstitute an agreement, that would not be in compliance on the basis that they have no idea what the original agreement contained ?? and that would be defence enough if they went for CCJ

 

reply from cabot was on he 18th Oct last year and heard nothing since from them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

it'll go nowhere near a court

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was re-reading my correspondence over the weekend and have a further question around DCA reconstituting CCA.

 

the original response from cabot in response to my CCA request, clearly informs me that they do not have this information on file and they have to request copy of credit agreement, statement of account and original and varied T&C from original lender.

 

as mentioned above - the SAR I have from Barclays clearly states they had a request from DCA (6th Nov 17) which they advised unable to comply as no information on file as an old account.

 

surely due to the above, if they reconstitute an agreement, that would not be in compliance on the basis that they have no idea what the original agreement contained ?? and that would be defence enough if they went for CCJ

 

reply from cabot was on he 18th Oct last year and heard nothing since from them.

 

Retain all the paperwork safely especially the ...." I have from Barclays clearly states they had a request from DCA (6th Nov 17) which they advised unable to comply as no information on file as an old account."

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a separate file box with sections for each of the creditors, CCA requests, DCA and or OC replies.

 

SAR is broken down into each type of account - and I will make notes on the crapbot file to refer to SAR request for proof.

 

I guess I just wait to see if crapbot do try to issue any threats in time to come and be ready with my proof

 

tks again guys - especially like DX confidence :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...