Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • Hi again all, below is another email they sent me, I just don't want to get in trouble or things to get worse with this crowd but I am taking your advice here. Anyway advice would be appreciated.   I am contacting you again after having tried to contact you both by email on 03/04/2024 and 10/04/2024, and by telephone on 10/04/2024 and 17/04/2024 to discuss the matter in relation to the regularization of the SOLIDWORKS case against xxx our company.   This is an urgent legal matter. Please contact me at your earliest convenience - +44 2921 920 296.    If we do not recieve a response before 24/04/2024, we will assume that you are not willing to settle this dispute amicably. The case will then be referred back to our client with whom, ultimately, the final decision lies on the enforcement of their intellectual property rights.    Yours sincerel y, Rhys
    • If you do get a letter of Claim and or Pre Action Protocol pack 15. Where there has been non-compliance with a pre-action protocol or this Practice Direction, the court may order that (a) the parties are relieved of the obligation to comply or further comply with the pre-action protocol or this Practice Direction; (b) the proceedings are stayed while particular steps are taken to comply with the pre-action protocol or this Practice Direction; (c) sanctions are to be applied. 16. The court will consider the effect of any non-compliance when deciding whether to impose any sanctions which may include— (a) an order that the party at fault pays the costs of the proceedings, or part of the costs of the other party or parties; (b) an order that the party at fault pay those costs on an indemnity basis; (c) if the party at fault is a claimant who has been awarded a sum of money, an order depriving that party of interest on that sum for a specified period, and/or awarding interest at a lower rate than would otherwise have been awarded; (d) if the party at fault is a defendant, and the claimant has been awarded a sum of money, an order awarding interest on that sum for a specified period at a higher rate, (not exceeding 10% above base rate), than the rate which would otherwise have been awarded. https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/pd_pre-action_conduct   .
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot/Shoos SPC claim - old Lloyds TSB loan ** WON granted decree of absolvitor + costs**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1974 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I have an old Bank loan from the early 2000s that I was making small payments towards until about a year or so ago when I ended up out of work.

 

I think it was with Lloyds but I forget now as I had a lot of debt at that time and paid off a lot of it but not all.

 

The balance is £3,7xx.

Having receieved a lot of letters from Cabot since I stopped paying (which I foolishly ignored) I have now received a letter from Shoosmiths saying that :-

 

"your agreement with our client is terminated and our client requires your proposals for payment, in the short term.

 

PLease treat this letter as notice that , unless an agreement is reached within 14 days of the date of this letter, we are instructed by our client to commence court proceedings against you ....."

 

They say their client is cabot financial and the original lender is Prime CRedit 1 s.a.r.l.

 

I am wondering whether it would be too late for me to go down the route of sending them a CCA or such like as although I was making payments for years

 

I'm not sure Cabot ever had authority to collect on the debt, but at the time I was too scared not to make an arrangement with them.

 

I'm not even sure if cabot even had authority to pursue my debt or whether they simply bought it from Lloyds when Lloyds contacted me to say they were writing it off, but I had wanted to make payments anyway.

 

I'm back in work now but struggling each month as I have 2 young kids now.

I could start paying again but it would be small amounts each month, whereas the letter suggests they want full payment.

 

I'd appreciate any advice.

I went through the whole CCA procedure with an old debt and they never responded and I heard no more about it,

but I wonder whether it's too late for that here since I was making payments for a few years.

 

Many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 184
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

yes ofcourse you can CCA them.

 

are you sure this IS a Lloyds debt?

 

typically Prime CRedit 1 s.a.r.l. deal with unenforceable welcome finance debts?

 

anyway sure as eggs is eggs

if they had it and now its in cabots hands its 99% a lemon debt.

 

matters not that you blindly paid it, just shows you were being cash cowed.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for replying dx100uk.

 

Do I need to send anything else to Shoos solicitors or just the CCA?

 

I seem to remember sending a SAR request to a collection agency a while back,

or is it different in this case because it's a solicitor I'm writing to?

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is never a need to ever send an SAR to fleecers

they only ever goto the OC

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

threads several months old now blueda...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

I have now received a"Simple Procedure Notice of Claim" from my local sheriff court, with Cabot as the claimant.

 

I meant to send a CCA request before now and didn't get round to it, not expecting anymore to come of it anyway.

 

Am I too late to send a CCA request now that a claim has been served?

Or can I assume that they have the necessary info to succeed with a claim if they have served a notice of claim?

 

They are referring to me entering an agreement with them in 2009 (I may have agreed to make small payments at that time) but then go on to say that I then defaulted on that agreement in 2007 (which is 2 years before they say I entered the agreement and makes no sense at all).

 

If it's too late for a CCA, would it be costly for me to defend the case until such time as they supply evidence that the debt was assigned to them in a way that makes me liable?

 

I thought perhaps my defence is that I have never entered a credit agreement with the claimant or anyone else in 2009

 

. I may have entered one for the amount they are talking about several years before 2009 with a high street bank (lloyds I think, but now I'm not so sure and if it was them, they wrote off the debt as I was almost bankrupt at the time and unemployed).

 

I have entered nothing with cabot, other than possibly an informal agreement to make monthly payments for an old debt they were chasing for someone else, but I can't be sure.

 

I'm not even sure the amount they're referring to is the debt I am thinking of.

 

I'd appreciate any advice.

 

On further looking at the claim form the background section describes how Cabot bought the claim from Prime Credit l s a r l(who they refer to as the original owner) in a debt purchase agreement in 2014 and therefore acquired title to the debt etc.

 

They say it was intimated to me in 2014.

I don't remember that happening though it is possible that it did and I ignored it.

I don't recall entering a credit agreement with Prime CRedit lsarl at anytime, but i'm not sure how I can find out.

 

I have not signed a consumer credit agreement since the early 2000s and got myself into a lot of debt when I was younger, which is why I'm not sure what this relates to and whether Prime Credit lsarl would have had any right to assign anything to cabot, or whether PC lsarl are just another debt chaser on behalf of someone else.

 

Again I'd appreciate any advice you guys might have.

 

Many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks dx, here's my paste-in with answers.

 

…...

name the issuing court: Selkirk Sheriff Court (Scotland)

 

Who Is The Claimant: Cabot Financial (UK) Limited, 16-22 Grafton Road, Worthing, BN11 1QP

 

Who Are the Solicitors: SHoosmiths LLP, Saltire Court, 20 Castle Terrace, Edinburgh, EH11 2EN

 

What type of action? (Simple/Ordinary): Simple

 

What is the claim for –

 

The claimants are a finance company which inter alia operates the business of debt purchasing By virtue of a debt purchase agreement ("the agreement") between the claimants and Prime Credit 1 s a r l ("the original owner") dated 29/07/2014,

the claimant acquired title to and was assigned the right to payment in respect of all debts and other monetary claims of any nature due or owing by the respondent to the original owner which were in existence as at the date of the Agreement, and in particular in relation to the contract hereinafter condescended upon

The said assignation was intimated to the respondent by way of written notice on or around 29/07/2014

The agreement between the respondent and the original owner upon which this action is based was regulated under the Consumer Credit Act 1974

Further information in relation to that agreement is contained in section D4, where we set out the sums due and the basis upon which they fell due.

 

Last Date Of Service:-25/07/2018

 

Last Date For Response:- 15/08/2018

 

What Documents are listed in Box E2:[or in your form requesting the same?]

- " A copy of the credit agreement, statements of account and notice of assignation will be produced in any defended process to follow hereon"

 

Is the claim for a Overdraft, credit card, loan account, HP Agreement, Catalogue or mobile phone debt - I'm not sure what debt the claim relates to, possibly LLoyds TSB professional studies loan but I can't be sure.

Shoosmiths letters have only ever mentioned Prime Credit 1 s.a.r.l as the "original lender" but I'm not aware of ever having a credit agreement with them.

 

BOX D5 what has the claimant stated: "I want the court to order the reposndent to pay me the sum of £3735.95"

from your knowledge: answer the following:

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? - I'm pretty sure the original credit agreement would have been before 2007.

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. - It is the assignee Cabot who has issued the claim but I'm not sure if Prime Credit 1 sarl were the original lender or whethe rthey also acquired the debt from someone else before assigning to Cabot.

I think that may have been the case as I don't rememebr having an agreement of any kind with Prime Credit.

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? - I can vaguely rememebr receiving something from Cabot a few years ago saying they were pursuing a debt on behalf of someone but I can't be sure.

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? - I'm not sure who the original creditor was.

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? - I haven't received one of those in a long time, possibly not since 2007/2008.

 

When was you last payment:-I can't be sure, I was making token payments to a number od debts for a long time, but only to debt collection agencies who had bought the debt.

Some were credit cards, some were loans.

I got into a real mess and paid around £1300 a month towards debts for a long time, until I became unemployed, at which point I agreed small payments to some creditors.

 

Why did you cease payments:- Again it sounds silly but i'm not sure, because I don't know which debt this applies to and I was paying smaller amounts up until a few years ago to some creditors.

Whoeever Prime CRedit represents (in terms of hight street lender) or whoever they bought the debt from, I may have been paying either of them small sums until a few years ago.

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? - No.

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management planicon? - I will have done at various stages from 1997 onwards,

with outcomes varying from restructuring to reduced payment plans,

or complete default followed by small payments to debt collection agencies,

or in some cases the creditor advising that they had written off the debt (which I'm sure LLoyds did in the end).

 

What I can be pretty of is that I have not entered any other credit agreements since 2007, aside from one credit card which I obtained last year from my bank and which has a zero balance on it.

Anything being referenced to thereafter can only be assignations or agreements I have made to pay smaller amounts to debt collectors.

 

I hope that helps guys, sorry some of the info is vague.

 

Thanks.

 

It seems odd that the agreement they refer to me having with the "Original Owner" is dated 23/01/2009 but haven't provided a copy of it with the claim.

 

I honestly can't think of entering a credit agreement in 2009 and if I did I have no idea who it would be with as I was unemployed at that point and had an appalling credit rating.

Edited by dx100uk
formatting
Link to post
Share on other sites

prime credit are debt buyer in jersey so there is no way cabot will ever be able to supply this signed agreement they have claiming the OC was prime.

 

have you the old letters from 2009?

and did you ever send that CCA request..

 

nothing you need to do till just before response date.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks dx.

 

No I don't have any of the old letters and i didn't send the CCA request. Is it too late to send that? I have one printed and in an envelope ready to go. I should have got my finger out and sent it but suspected they were bluffing. More fool me.

 

If its too late for CCA, would it be worth contacting the solicitor at Shoos and asking him to send me a copy of the agreement he'll be lodging?

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't do anything without checking here first

NO you do not contact the fleecers..

CCA will be sent yes but not till the nearer the response date.

 

get reading SPC claims for now

 

https://cse.google.co.uk/cse?cx=partner-pub-8889411648654839:6449422593&ie=UTF-8&q=simple+procedure+SPC+cabot+shoo&sa=Search+CAG

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

bar your post in 2017 what evidence have we this IS the LLoyds loan?

is this on your credit file?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't have any evidence that it's Lloyds no,

i can't remember what made me think that in 2017,

 

whether it was a direct reference or me jumping to conclusions based on the amount as it would have to be one of my larger debts and lloyds was one that wrote it off and i never heard from

 

(i owed 20k and paid a lot of it off before they did that so the amount of 3700ish might make sense if it was them) .

 

I did have a welcome finance loan (which you said these chasers normally point towards)

but i paif that off in full (£2400 for a £1000 loan, proper stupidity i know).

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I meant to say

- I haven't obtained a credit report in years.

 

My score is 432/700 on clearscore but i'm not sure if that says anything at all.

 

It doesn't give a full report, just a "timeline" which shows zero debt going back to 2010.

 

I could send off for a full report if you think that would be wise?

Link to post
Share on other sites

try Noddle

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will do, thanks.

 

I signed up to Noddle and the only negative thing showing on there is a £15 defaulted debt to lowell from 2012 for a mobile phone bill. Everything else is showing uptodate or settled (current accounts and one credit card). None of my old loans and credit cards are shown on there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so defaulted more than 6 yrs ago

 

we need info...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

do what ever you need too to get to the bottom of this bar ring the fleecers…

 

no harm in ringing LLoyds up ..poke em' see what they say

you must have some ref no's to try with them...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...