Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for that i thought id just ask as i was unsure.  Just hope its returned to me and doesnt spend the rest of its life going back and forth to Singapore  
    • Thanks @lolerz. I've attached it to the post. What do you think? What's the organ grinder? NTK.pdf
    • I'm afraid that if the value of the item was under declared then that is probably the best that you can hope for. Also, because the item was incorrectly addressed – even by a single letter, if that because the issue relating to the delivery then that has probably compounded the problem. There is probably very little that can be done. If you are lucky you will get the item back and then you can start again and declare it properly. Undervaluing parcels which are sent by any means is always going to cause a problem if the item is lost or damaged. It may mean that the cost of delivery is slightly less – but at the end of the day the risk becomes yours. When you enter into any kind of contract, effectively you declare it a level of risk to your contracting partner – and they decide to enter into the contract with you based on that level of risk. You have declared a level of risk and £50 – and that's the deal.   Additionally, undervaluing an item which is an internationally has the effect also of evading customs and any VAT system which is in force in that country – and that makes the whole thing a little bit more serious
    • Perfect. Nice and brief and to the point. You don't bother to start telling your life story. Just the way it should be. Send it off. You have probably done enough reading to understand that it won't make any difference don't start drafting your particulars of claim. Open an account with the MoneyClaim County Court system and start preparing. Post your particulars of claim here before you click it off. You may have noticed that at some point you will be asked if you want to go to mediation on this. We used to advise it but now we recommend that you decline mediation and go to trial. Your chances of success are much better than 95%. Going to trial will incur an additional hearing fee but of course you will get that back. However if you go to mediation, they will simply try to penny pinch and to get you to compromise and also they will sign you up to a confidentiality agreement and probably threaten you if you breach it. Not only that, if the mediation fails because you stand your ground, it will add additional delay while they then give you a date to go to trial. The best thing to do is to decline mediation – prepare for court hearing. Pay the extra fee. The chances are that rather than get a judgement against them they will then offer you a full settlement rather than go to court. If they do offer you full settlement then you will be obliged to accept it – but that's what you want. If they don't offer you full settlement then you will go to trial and there will be a judgement against them. Just so that you understand, our first interest is that you get your money back – but a close second is that it does go to trial and there is a judgement which we will then be able to use to help other people. Anyway as you should realise, we will help you all the way.
    • I sent a parcel to Singapore but i spelt the address incorrecltly by 1 letter so the parcel couldnt be delivered and was returned back to the Uk but checking the tracking today the parcel had returned to the UK but is somehow on its way back to Singapore as the tracking says "Item leaving the UK"    Ive spoken ( tweeted) Royal Mail help who confirm that the parcel seems to be going back to Singapore and that if its not " Delivered" by the 29th of April theyll deem it as lost and will accept a claim but i cant remeber when booking what the compensation amount was but i dont think it covers the amount of the item.  As it was my fault that it wasnt delivered in the first place can i trey and claim the full amount back ? i think if i remember correctly it was £50 compensation but the item was £170 So the timeline is thus ...   22nd Of March .    Booked via P2G & dropped off a Post Office.  25th March arrives in Singapore and goes through customs ect ect 26th   Incorrect address and item is flagged as "return to sender" 28th Item leaves Overseas intenational processing centre 15th of April , Item is leaving the Uk (Again)   ?    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Prosecution threat-TOC was Arriva Trains Wales - without valid ticket BUT no machines


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2351 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Evening,

hope you can help.

 

My 19yo student son got a very irregular, zero-hours contract P/T job in the summer.

He doesn't drive so relied on train to get him to/from work.

Often his employer would phone in the morning & ask him to come straight into work

 

We live in a small SE Wales town,

there is no ticket office,

station staff or even any ticket machine.

 

Unless we pre-book tickets days in advance it's impossible to board a train with a ticket & we therefore rely on ticket inspectors coming round in order to buy a valid return ticket.

 

My son always bought a ticket accordingly, always had the right change etc available. This is important as he knows he needs a ticket to get through the barrier at his destination (Cardiff Central).

 

On one day no inspector came round to sell him a ticket,

my son had a cursory walk down the carriage to find staff,

finding no one

 

he decided to get off the train at the first opportunity (at Newport) and go and purchase a return ticket for his full journey there,

knowing he had time to catch the next onward train to Cardiff.

 

He explained things and the male on the barriers wouldn't allow him to buy a ticket, instead proceeded to interview my son.

 

He then allowed my son to buy a ticket (£6.35 return fare with student rail card) & told my son "there should be no further action".

 

Couple of weeks later my son receives a stern letter from 'Transport Investigations Ltd acting in Arriva Trains Wales behalf.

 

That letter had erroneous details (his journey details totally wrong)

he wrote back clarifying & also stating that

 

(a) he couldn't buy a ticket before boarding as no ticket machine etc exists at our local station,

 

(b) he didn't know in advance that he'd need to travel as only got called that day by his employer,

 

© that he's tried to find a ticket inspector then got off at first station, breaking his journey at some inconvenience, to buy a ticket and

 

(d) having then bought a ticket he was told he'd face NFA.

 

Today, 7wks after his journey he's received a second letter from TIL demanding £69.50 or prosecution for failing to show a valid ticket when asked.

 

This all sounds very unfair almost aggressive IMO.

Surely if there are no facilities to buy a ticket when boarding a train and one makes excellent attempts to buy one at the first opportunity

(looking for an on board inspector)

then getting off at the next stop to buy a ticket

then every opportunity to abuse by the law has been shown?

 

He's young & possibly a bit naive

- I'd have personally told the 'gentleman' at Newport station exactly where he could stick his interview note book

- but equally fallen foul by being too honest when it would have been less hassle to have stayed on the train and bought his return ticket at Cardiff,

something i myself have done on dozens of occasions when travelling to work on the same route and no one came round to sell me a ticket.

 

Sorry to gave waffled on,

does anyone have any advice on how to proceed please?

 

What actual offence has been committed if my son couldn't possibly buy a ticket (no facilities) but then made every effort to subsequently buy one and did indeed buy a valid ticket?

 

Many thanks

Dee

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does the letter simply say pay up

Or

Is it asking for his side of the story?

 

Sadly in all Truth they are correct

If your station has no machines etc then you must seek out onboard staff and purchase travel

He's mistake was to leave the train.

 

Moved to the public transport forum

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The 'offence' is 'travelling without a valid ticket'. I agree he should have only got off at Cardiff Central.

On average how many times per week does he do the same journey? Which train-operating Co?

A letter to HO may produce a satisfactory resolution.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only thing i can see in their t&c is this:

"Please Note:

When starting your journey from a station with ticket purchasing facilities in operation, you must buy a valid ticket for your journey*before you board.*"

 

It doesn't say what to do if there are no ticket facilities at the start of the journey, so they should accept your son's effort to buy a ticket.

Write to Arriva instead of their contractor which probably is only interested in squeezing money out of passengers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you are supposed to stay on the train and seek out the guard, if you boarded at a station without ticketing facilities. If you get to the destination station without having managed to get to the guard because the train was packed out with standing passengers or because the guard was not issuing tickets for whatever reason, then you should see a member of staff on the station platform. There are usually train operating customer services staff on the platform.

 

The mistake made in good faith was getting off the train at Newport.

 

Write to Arriva head office with a complaint about the way this is being hamdled.

 

My local station (GWR) does not have a ticket office off peak and a mostly broken ticket machine. At peak time, you can board without a ticket and buy one from the guard onboard without any problem. There is a sign up saying don't board without a ticket, but this is not applied by GWR. If you speak to staff they just say the sign is to scare youngsters from dodging fares. As long as you attempt to buy a ticket and not recommended at station barriers where you are looking to escape, then you should not have a problem.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The 'offence' is 'travelling without a valid ticket'. I agree he should have only got off at Cardiff Central.

On average how many times per week does he do the same journey? Which train-operating Co?

A letter to HO may produce a satisfactory resolution.

 

If he got off at Newport, they can’t prosecute him for “travelling without a valid ticket to Cardiff”!, only to Newport .... and that can be batted away (see below)

If he has consistently stated that:

a) there were no operating ticket machines at his initial station

b) he tried to find staff on the train

c) he got off (early!) to seek out someone to buy a ticket from, and

d) made it clear he wasn’t trying their buy a “short” ticket from a station closer, but instead the full ticket from his joining station to Cardiff

 

Then he should be fine.

He can demonstrate that he never intended to avoid his fare (& thus a S5 RRA 1889 prosecution is a non-starter), and that he has a statutory defence to a Byelaw 18 prosecution.

Incidentally, be glad he did speak when interviewed, as if he had gone down your route of “I'd have personally told the 'gentleman' at Newport station exactly where he could stick his interview note book“, a S5 Charge (for failing to give details) might have followed, and it makes it look more like the person does have intent to avoid their fare!

 

Byelaw 18:

18. Ticketless travel in non-compulsory ticket areas

(1) In any area not designated as a compulsory ticket area, no person shall enter any train for the purpose of travelling on the railway unless he has with him a valid ticket entitling him to travel.

(2) A person shall hand over his ticket for inspection and verification of validity when asked to do so by an authorised person.

(3) No person shall be in breach of Byelaw 18(1) or 18(2) if:

(i) there were no facilities in working order for the issue or validation of any ticket at the time when, and the station where, he began his journey; or

 

(I’ve left the final “or” in to show that it isn’t “and” further requirements)

 

Expect them to go and check that there were no facilities (no ticket office, no ticket machine, or if there is a ticket machine that it was out of order).

Expect them to check if there was a member of staff (other than the driver!) on the train (and if there was, if they sold tickets to anyone else or were ‘hiding’ in their cab!).

 

I’d certainly write back explaining the situation again, that you believe it clearly shows there was no intent to avoid any of his fare, that he tried and couldn’t on the train, that he was in fact making extra effort to try to pay it (at an intermediate station that he knew was manned), and that the lack of facilities at the first station show a Byelaw 18 prosecution isn’t warranted.

What I’m unsure of is whether he should just do this, or if he should consider raising it with the local press too!

Link to post
Share on other sites

stick to writing back to whom sent the letter

not elsewhere.... as bazza recommends above..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The ltd company sending letters won't be interested in any excuse, just money.

 

A letter to TOC head office would get a more appropriate and sensible response in my experience.

 

By all means,

i would copy the ltd company in the communication so they know what's going on and they're not being ignored,

but surely they won't retract their request for money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys.

Many thanks for your replies & sound advice.

TOC was Arriva Trains Wales.

 

He's done this same journey a few times and usually been able to pay for his return ticket when he arrives at Cardiff

BUT the ticket staff there never apply his rail card discount which is unfair particularly as he's a self-funding student.

Hence on this one occasion he thought he'd get off early at Newport & hoped to buy a discounted full return.

 

It seems if you board a train at a small rural station with no ticket machine or other facilities the TOC will catch you by either charging a full fare and ignoring rail cards, or alternatively employing the likes of TIL to threaten prosecution.

 

We'll write to Arriva and ask them to consider all the facts & hopefully they'll see sense.

 

Regards

 

Dee

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys. Many thanks for your replies & sound advice. TOC was Arriva Trains Wales. He's done this same journey a few times and usually been able to pay for his return ticket when he arrives at Cardiff BUT the ticket staff there never apply his rail card discount which is unfair

 

........

 

It seems if you board a train at a small rural station with no ticket machine or other facilities the TOC will catch you by either charging a full fare and ignoring rail cards, or alternatively employing the likes of TIL to threaten prosecution.

 

We'll write to Arriva and ask them to consider all the facts & hopefully they'll see sense.

 

Regards

 

Dee

 

Should the trains have a guard / conductor / train manager?

Is all of Arriva Trains Wales or that particular services sometimes / usually / always ‘DOO’? (Driver only operation).

 

If there is a member of on train staff (other than the driver!): could he get on the carriage he can see them at when he boards?

If there isn’t a member of on train staff he can make a strong case for being allowed the railcard fare, the key determinant being that he is buying the ticket at his first realistic opportunity.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

There are no passenger services on Arriva Trains Wales that are driver only operated. Department for Transport agreement with the franchise holder confirm that the TOC has a Conductor Guard on all services.

 

Arriva Trains Wales Revenue Enforcement Policy

 

The ethos of Arriva Trains Wales is to collect the correct revenue that we are contractually due from all our passengers. We recognise however there is a small minority of passengers who will deliberately attempt to evade payment. This document sets out the process of how we will deal with these passengers and the steps we would put in place to help and protect passengers who are unaware of their responsibilities getting captured by the process.

 

The underlying principal of this process is to protect passengers who make an innocent mistake from those who are deliberate ticketless passengers. In the first instance the customer will be asked for payment with a reasonable administration charge. The process is intended to identify those who are constant offenders or those that have carried out acts of fraud. For those passengers who have attempted to defraud we have no option but to carry out court proceedings.

 

These processes will be in line with the ATOC Code of Practice ‘arrangements for travel ticket irregularities’ and the Passenger Focus publication ‘ticket to ride’.

 

Process Overview

 

All Passengers must have the correct ticket for the journey they are taking and it is their responsibility to have one, they must how ever be given an opportunity to purchase tickets before entering this process.

 

These opportunities are:

 

Before boarding any Train

 

• Booking office

• Ticket Vending Machine (TVM)

 

If no facilities were available before boarding

 

• On train

 

If there has not been an opportunity to purchase a ticket then the passenger should be sold the correct one. In the event of a passenger choosing not to purchase a ticket they will be interviewed. After a passenger, has been interviewed for travelling without a valid ticket, before any further action is taken the customer will be written to and given 21days to confirm the details of the information provided at the time. They will be offered the opportunity to provide clarification or any mitigating circumstances.

 

If the customer has not responded within 21 days then further action will be taken.

 

Once a full response has been received the case will be reviewed. All cases will be assessed on their own merit. There are three possible outcomes from any case

 

• Ceasing of Proceedings

• Administrative Settlement

• Prosecution

 

Customers can make genuine mistakes. If this is the first time a customer has been identified within this process they should not normally be taken to prosecution and may be offered an administrative settlement. The exception to this is if there is an attempted fraud or other aggravating circumstance.

 

Prosecution will be the last course of action. There are some areas where prosecution is unavoidable.

 

Fraud

• Giving false personal details

• Knowingly claiming a short journey

• Repeat offender e.g. Travelling without a ticket on more than one occasion

 

Recording of Passengers Interviewed:

 

Detailed records of the customers that have been interviewed will be held in accordance with data protection laws.

 

Customers Contact

 

Transport Investigations Ltd will handle all correspondence with customers with regards to this policy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...