Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have had a secondary thought.  I borrowed £s from a completely separate entity 6y ago. It was personal and unsecured. I was going to repay upon sale of the property. But then repo and I couldn't.  Eventually they applied and got a charging order on the property.  Their lawyers wrote that if I didn't repay they may apply for an order for sale.  I'm not in control of the sale.  The lender won't agree to an order for sale.  The judge won't expedite it/ extract from trial.  Someone here on cag may or may not suggest I can apply for an order v the receiver?  But could I alternatively ask this separate entity with a c.o to carry out their threat and actually make an application to court for an order for sale v the receiver instead?
    • You left the PCN number showing, but no worries, I've redacted it. Euro Car parks are very well known to us.  I've just skimmed through the titles of the latest 100 cases we have with them (I gave up after 100) and, despite all their bluster and threats, in not one have they taken the Cagger to court. You stayed there for 2 hours &:45 minutes.  I'm guessing the limit is 2 hours and 30 minutes, right?  
    • If the claimant fails to draft directions the court can order a Case Management Hearing to set them but normally in Fast Track claims the claimant sets the directions...Unlike small claims track which are always set the court.
    • Not Evris offer, the court offers mediation service.   All claims proceed to hearing if mediation fails /not happen.   Why do you not wish to attend in person to stand your claim ?     Absolutely you must comply with the courts directions or your claim risks being struck out. Preparation for a hearing should happen irrespective of mediation.   https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/460613-suing-a-parcel-delivery-company-when-you-dont-have-a-direct-contract-with-them-–-third-party-rights-copy-of-judgment-available/#comment-5255007   Andy  
    • LPA.  (I'm fighting insolvency due to all the stuff that he and lender have done).  He appointed estate agents - (changed several times). Disclosure shows he was originally appointed for a specific reason (3m after repo) : using his powers as acting for leaseholder to serve notice on freeholders (to grab fh).  There was interest from 3 potential buyers. He chose one whose offer depended on a positive result of the notice.  Disc also shows he'd taken counsel advice - which was 'he'd fail'.  He'd simultaneously asked to resign as his job (of serving notice) was done and he'd found a buyer.  Lender asked him to stay on to assign notice to the buyer.  Notice failed, buyer didn't buy.  So receiver stayed.  There was 1 buyer who wanted to proceed w/o fh but receiver/ lender wasted 1y trying to get rid of them!  Disc shows why. But I didn't know why at the time. In later months Lender voiced getting rid of receiver. Various reasons - including cost.  But there's a contradiction/ irony: as I've seen an email (of 4y ago) which shows the receiver telling lender not to incur significant costs and to minimize receiver costs.    Yet lender then asked him to serve another notice - again counsel advice indicated 'he'd fail'.  And he did fail.  But wasted 3y trying and incurred huge legal costs - lender trying to pass on to me. Lender interfered - said wanted to do works.  Receiver should have said no.  But disc. shows he agreed to step aside to let them do the works - on proviso lender would discuss potential costs first (they didn't), works wouldn't take long (took 15m), and lender would hold interest (they didn't) (this last point is crucial for me now - as I need to know if I can argue that all interest beyond this point shouldnt be allowed?)   I need to check receiver witness statement in litigation with freeholders to see exactly what he said about 'his position'. But I remember it being along the lines of - 'if the works increased the value of the property he didn't have a problem'.  Lender/ receiver real problems started at this point. The cost of works and 4y passage of time has meant there is no real increase in value. Lender (or receiver) didn't get any permissions (statutory or fh) (and didn't tell me) and just bulldozed the property to an empty shell.  The freeholders served notice on me as leaseholder for breach of covenants (strict no alterations).  The Lender stepped in (acting for me) to issue notice for relief of forfeiture - not the receiver.  That wasted 2y of litigation (3y if inc the works) and incurred huge costs (both sides).  Lender's aim was to do the works that every potential buyer balked at due to the lease restrictions.  Lender and receiver knew couldn't do works w/o fh permission. Lender did them anyway; receiver allowed.  Receiver remained appointed.  I'm arguing lender interfered in receiver duties.  Receiver should have just sold property 4-5y ago w/o allowing any works.  Almost 3y since works finished the property remains unsold (>5y from repo). The property looks brand new - but it was great before.  The lender spent a ton of money - hoping that would facilitate a quick sale.  But the money they spent and the years they have wasted has meant they had to increase sale price.  It's now completely overpriced.  And - of course - the same issues that put buyers off (before works) still exist.   The receiver has tried for 2y to assert the works increased value. But he is relying on agents estimates - which have proved highly speculative. (Usual trick of an agent to give a high value to get the business - and then tell seller to reduce when no-one buys.). And of course lender continues to accrue interest (despite 4y ago receiver saying pause interest). Lender tried to persuade receiver to use specific agent. Disc shows this agent was best friends with the lender's main investor in the property.  Before works this agent had valued it low.  After works this agent suggested a value 70% higher!  The lender persuaded receiver to sack one agent and instead use this agent.  No offers. (Price way too high).   Research has uncovered that this main investor has since died.  I guess his investment is part of probate? And his family want it back?    Disc shows the sacked agent had actually received a high offer 1y ago.  Receiver rejected it.  (thus I don't know if the buyer would have ever proceeded). He was relying on the high speculative valuation the agents had given him to pitch for the business. The agents were in a catch-22.  The receiver sacked them. Disc shows there has been 0 interest ever since (inc via new agent requested by lender). I don't think lender or receiver want all this to come out in public domain via a trial.  It will ruin their reputations. If I can't get an order for sale with lender - can I apply separately against receiver?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Argos item not as described


Hoganj719
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2370 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

I purchased an electric shower from Argos,

the description stated 'suitable for all water systems'.

I employed a trades person on a fit only basis,

 

when the shower was fitted it did not function,

on investigation the shower was suitable for cold water mains supply only which I do not have.

 

This has resulted in me paying the trades person twice,

the second time to fit a suitable shower and left a fixing hole in my wall the new shower doesn't cover.

 

I have written to Argos and they state

1. It is the fitters responsibility to read the manufacturers instructions even though the fitting was carried out correctly

 

2. The duty of care rests with the trades person even though I instructed them to fit the shower confident it was the right one as advertised.

 

I have asked for compensation for the plumbing costs and a goodwill gesture for the damaged wall which they are refusing.

 

 

Can anyone help.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why did the trades man connect it then if you have no cold water feed...did he connect it to the hot water feed ?

 

This wont have enough pressure which the tradesman would have known ?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I employed a trades person at short notice as I only have a shower (no bath) and my shower had ceased to work.

 

The agreement was I would supply the shower and that they would fit the shower to the wall, plumb the water connection and wire the electrics.

I'm not sure how a trades person who does not specialise in showers (nor do they need to for a shower swap) would know what was suitable and what was not and why they would disbelieve me when I said 'fit this please', there was nothing to gain for them.

 

I have since learnt there are at least 4 types of shower water supply, mains, combi, vented and tank gravity fed,

that's an aside the shower I bought clearly stated suitable for all water systems,

my trades person was a general builder and carried out the job as instructed.

Edited by Hoganj719
Link to post
Share on other sites

show us the item on the argos site.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.argos.co.uk/product/8331977

 

Argos have changed the item description to read

- Compatible with all water systems

- install as per manufacturers guidelines.

 

Which is still incorrect

the shower is not compatible with all water systems

and the installation in my case was correct,

the installation is not the issue.

 

Why do you ask as this isn't relevant or helpful,

but as you asked I have cold water mains to the sink,

I assume as the pressure is low in my area when the bathroom was fitted, before my time,

 

a gravity fed system from the loft was installed so I have a cold water supply but at low pressure which electric showers aren't suitable for,

 

I need either an external pump fitted for about £440.00 or an electric shower with an integrated pump,

 

hope this helps you, can you help me?

Link to post
Share on other sites

" a gravity fed system from the loft was installed "

 

Beginning to make sense now....if only you had posted that in your initial post

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I've just read the instructions on installation and it says cold water mains pressure.

So you may have a case.

But they also say read before installing.

 

There is also mention in the fault finding section at back of booklet about gravity fed systems and you can use this shower with an average gravity system.

What is the height of the tank to the shower unit?

 

Ps my triton electric shower works fine from my cold water tank system and there is only 5 foot height difference.

 

After re-reading your responses in starting to think your general builder is seeing you as a bit of a cash cow.

 

The pressure from a gravity fed system as long as you have at least a head of at least 5 feet will give you mains pressure anyway- your shower should function.

 

A trades person should of read the specifics of installing the shower.

Is he qualified to do the electrics?

 

You can buy a water pump from around £60 trade (around 100 quid to fit)

Or even if you went to screwdix you can get one for around £100

 

https://www.screwfix.com/c/bathrooms-kitchens/shower-pumps/cat820270?cm_mmc=Google-_-Bathrooms%20%7c%20Showers%20and%20Enclosures%20%7c%20Generic%20-%20Non-RLSAs-_-Parts%20-%20Pumps%20-%20Exact-_-water%20shower%20pump__kenshoo_clickid_&ds_rl=1245250&gclid=EAIaIQobChMImfWs9eOB1wIVCI0bCh02Sge4EAAYASAAEgJ6UPD_BwE&gclsrc=aw.ds&dclid=CK7erPrjgdcCFfcT0wodmZgPRg

 

I'm thinking you are being seen as a free ATM machine by the general builder.

 

One other small point, why didn't you get a plumber to do the shower rather than a general builder?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the response,

assuming the fitter arrived and read the instructions

he would not have fitted the shower

I would have been liable for a call out charge which to me would be Argos' fault.

 

Sorry I have read the booklet and in no way does it say gravity fed will work, can you please quote.

 

I have consulted Which and you dont need any qualifications to swap out a shower only install from new.

 

The builder has not taken any advantage

they fitted the shower as requested,

it wasnt fit for purpose,

 

I bought another shower they fitted that and charged accordingly,

I used a general trades person as this happened on a Sunday evening,

we dont have a bath and in a busy house hold

 

I needed the situation rectifying quickly before work, Uni etc

and they were the only ones available at short notice

 

he was more than capable of connecting one pipe, drilling four holes in the wall and connecting three wires.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The stuff on gravity fed systems is in the faq or troubleshooting pages.

 

General builder would need to be qualified in electrics.

What if he had fitted it and you turn it on and got electrocuted? Its not swapping out, and a reputable and qualified person would of read the specifics before installing.

 

It matters not that the builder was the only one available at short notice. In fact it should of been the 1st red flag.

 

I can see Argos point in their reply to you.

Not fitted in accordance to manufactures guidelines.

If they were read before fitting the product could of been returned.

Maybe someone with a law degree can pick thru the small print to the nth degree for you and find a small loophole but I don't think you have a strong case but still try.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok,

I have read the manufacturers guidance and there is nothing suggesting gravity fed is suitable, please quote.

 

No the builder would not need to be electrics qualified, please look at the advice from Which, I cant post the link as the forum wont let me.

 

The person did not need to read the instructions as it is very basic, drill four holes, secure shower, connect pipe, wire the same as a standard plug.

 

No red flags, job done at a reasonable price, the shower failed as it was not sold as described, the fitting was not the issue.

 

The shower was fitted in accordance with the manufactures guidelines even though they weren't consulted, even if they had been referred to that part of the booklet is past the compatibility piece which is the real issue, the shower failed to work as the water pressure was not sufficient.

I did return the product and was refunded as the item was not fit for purpose/sold as described my issue now is consequential loss.

 

In summation:

1. Was the shower advertised as suitable for ALL water systems, Yes,

 

2. Was the shower fitted correctly, Yes,

 

3. Did it work, No,

 

4. Was this due to the item being installed incorrectly, No,

 

5 Was the shower sold as advertised, No,

 

6 Had the instructions been read from cover to cover in spite of the advertised suitability would the shower have been fitted, No,

 

7 Would I have still been charged by the trades person for a call out, Yes,

 

8 Are Argos at fault, please comment......

Edited by Hoganj719
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 yes

2 no ( shouldn't of been fitted if competent person reading instructions)

3 no

4 yes. Not fitted to manufactures guidelines. Would of been avoided by answer in post 2

5 no

6 no. And there lies your problem

7 no. Shower could of been returned and a suitable one purchased to be fitted.

 

8... Partly. But not to the level of compensation your requesting.

 

 

Ps you still have not said how much of a head of water you have above the shower.

My trinton shower works perfectly well inspire it saying its for cold mains only.

You haven't also answered y your builder wants to charge you £440 for a pump you can get for £60.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

1. On the Argos link you provided it states "Compatible with all water systems - install as per manufacturers guidelines."

Did it state this at the time of purchase?

 

2. On the same Argos link were all 4 of the "view document PDF" displayed at time of purchase?

 

3. On the same Argos link if you download the very first "view document PDF" and go to Page 2 of PDF -Section 1 Checklist - Specification - Pumbling - Supply Source it states clearly "Mains pressure cold water".

 

4. In your above post its a bit confusing as you seem to imply the person you employed did not read the manufacturers and just installed the shower but then imply it was installed as per the manufactures instructions. (Did the person you employed fit the shower as per the install instructions from the manufacturer?)

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the confusion comes from compatible with all water systems.

The shower does as long as your system gives mains pressue.

Mains water pressure is the ability to fill a 1 gallon container in 30 seconds or less.

 

If you have to modify your system then that's an addition and out of manufactures hands.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi the wording and PDF documents have since been added. On point 4 the shower was fitted correctly, the documents were not read but nothing in the installation impaired the performance of the shower. Hope that makes sense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 yes

2 no ( shouldn't of been fitted if competent person reading instructions). The installation was performed correctly.

3 no

4 yes. Not fitted to manufactures guidelines. Would of been avoided by answer in post 2. Disagree fitted correctly, water supply wrong

5 no

6 no. And there lies your problem

7 no. Shower could of been returned and a suitable one purchased to be fitted. The shower was returned, the fee to the fitter would be a call out charge.

 

8... Partly. But not to the level of compensation your requesting. What level do you suggest?

 

 

Ps you still have not said how much of a head of water you have above the shower. Sorry not had time to measure it.

My trinton shower works perfectly well inspire it saying its for cold mains only.

You haven't also answered y your builder wants to charge you £440 for a pump you can get for £60.

My builder didn't, this was a separate quote which I dismissed, I then sourced a shower with a built in pump designed for tank fed systems and had that fitted.
Link to post
Share on other sites

ah you've finally understood...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...