Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If the legendary dx could offer his wisdom it would be greatly appreciated 
    • Hi there Manager for our soccer sixes team moved overseas mid season and we struggled for numbers so we told the ref about 5 weeks prior to seasons end that we would see out these games then be done and he told us he’d ’pass the message on to the relevant people’. Heard nothing, then 3 days prior to the new season beginning we were given our fixture for that weekend. Told the guy over text we had pulled out and the ref should’ve passed a message on but we were told sufficient notice wasn’t given and it needed to be in writing. I argued it’s not our fault the ref didn’t do as he said but we were countered by the T&Cs.    now being chased for what was £608 kindly reduced to £476 to pay off remainder of the season. Been sent a letter in the post from their accountancy team and told needs to be paid by Friday.   seen a lot of the other threads saying we can literally just ignore everything but im concerned about debt collections and credit score being harmed. Can anyone confirm if this all works/what we should do?   thanks
    • Hi,   I have given an official police witness statement for the prosecution in an upcoming criminal court case, and I am very anxious about what might happen.  Specifically regarding being cross-examined.  My statement is very short, and only a couple of paragraphs long, regarding a conversation I had with one of the victims.  I have tried to research online about what information about me the defence barrister might be able to find and use to discredit me.  I have by no means have a shady past but, I am concerned about what private information might be brought up, and as this is a case that will be in the national press as it is in the public interest.  The two preliminary hearings were reported in the papers.   I have tried to research  online what information the opposition can seek, but it is all very complicated.  I believe that they can legally access public records, but I'm not sure what information public records hold.  Can they access my medical records, educational history, HMRC, and Department for Work and Pensions? (I am a self employed sole trader).  I was arrested once, and this was unfortunately instigated by the victim in this case, so could well be of interest to them.  It resulted in no further action, however I have only discovered this week that that, in fact, this means I have a criminal record, and will be so until I am 100 (no chance)! This has really annoyed me to say the least, especially since I asked him afterwards why he rang the police and he said 'for a laugh'.  So I have started to look into applying for it to be deleted, but again, if anyone has any advice on this I would be appreciative. At the moment, my name isn't on the confirmed list to give evidence, but the detective I have been dealing with has said it is 'likely'. The names of the victims in this case will not be allowed to be reported, are witnesses fair game for the press? I really need no know how deep they can delve in to my life so I am prepared if my character gets assassinated in front of the nation. I really wish I'd never agreed to this.   Many thanks
    • A belated thanks dx. Yes I may take your advice regarding StepChange. I am finding that I am telling them (on behalf of my Son) the true balances outstanding? They never seem to check properly in which worries me. If I was to take on myself is there another way of dealing with various debts? I have already submitted other IRL complaints on his behalf. Today I have received a further response from Quidie T/A Fernovo confirming that they will waiver all interest paid.
    • Good evening  Case hearing this Friday 26/04. looking to have all my prep/papers ready.    just checking in to get update on my last post , ( the t&c’s attached). No name or address on them as per #49   thank you UCM  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Was paying instalments on daimond ring, now been sold by shop


theworriedwife
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2377 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I reserved a ring in a jewellers shop and paid a deposit.

 

I was paying some instalments but then became poorly and am now not in a financial position to finish paying.

 

A couple of years has passed by.

 

I contacted the retailer [small, local shop] who said they have sold the ring and I can't have my money back.

 

They'll deduct 20% from what I have paid so far and let me choose something from the shop.

 

Where do I stand?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I assume you signed some form of agreement?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not an agreement as such.

There was a little repayments card which I have,

 

It says "All goods remain the property of xxx Jewellers until payment is made in full".

 

But there is no specified timescale in which to pay.

 

I realise I should have made the payments sooner,

 

I have emailed a few times, but it's only now that they have responded.

 

I just wondered what my rights might be, and hoped someone on here may know!

Link to post
Share on other sites

IMHO they have had your money for XX mts

they should be paying you interest on it as they've deprived you of investing it elsewhere.

 

demand to see their T&C's

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

to sum up you agreed to purchase an item and they agreed to let you pay for it over a period of time and kept title to it until it was paid for in full.

So far nothing unusual.

 

You failed to pay for the tiem within either an agreed time for a reasonable time.

As 2 years have passed by they cannot be held to the part of the contract that says they have to hold the item for you and you only so by selling it they havent breached the contract

 

Now, as they have recovered their money (assuming they sold it at the full price) they now cannot perform to the contract by supplying you with that item and you are not obliged to buy anything else so they are obliged to refund you the money less any true expense they have suffered in the meanwhile

 

for example if they sold the ring for less than the price they agreed with you they may keep the difference.

What they cant do is decide to subtract 20% as an arbitrary sum and force you to have a credit note for the remainder, that wasnt part of the deal agreed.

 

It appears that neither of you thought about the consequences of not paying the money due off so didnt have any terms to cover that eventuality so trying to get them to see reason over this will be difficult

 

you need to give them a letter outlining this point about THEM not being able to perform to the contract making it void in its entirety and thus they owe you a full refund ( subject to their costs being almost zero as outlined above)

 

Give them a set period of time to respond with either payment or an acceptable offer as what they have proposed so far isnt acceptable or part of any agreed contractual condition.

 

How much money is involved?

this may make a difference to how they proceed,

if it is a very small sum they wont want to put a lot of effort into accommodating your request

if it is a large amount they wont want to see their cash reserves suddenly dip and have to tell their accountant to redo the last 2 years figures.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The ring was £550 and I paid approx £300 so far.

It's not a lot of money, but we are in dire financial straits and I really need the refund.

 

Thank you for your advice,

I will write as you have suggested and see what sort of reply I get.

 

Can I quote the sale of goods act or anything like that?

I guess not since they have't actually sold it to me yet.

 

I realise I was in the wrong by not paying quickly but there was no agreed timescale, just a little card with the amounts I had paid written on it and deducted form the total each time.

 

Last time I went in it was still there but they are now saying it has sold this year.

It was 2nd hand / antique so it's possible it even went up in value [?].

Thank you for your advice

 

sorry, actual amount paid by me was £380 so far.

Just in case that makes any difference

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...