Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Should this to be take into court with him or should he send something in earlier?
    • This is the other sign  parking sign 1a.pdf
    • 4 means that they need to name and then tell the people who will be affected that there has been an application made, what the application relates to (specificially "whether it relates to the exercise of the court’s jurisdiction in relation to P’s property and affairs, or P’s personal welfare, or to both) and what this application contains (i.e what order they want made as a result of it) 5 just means that teh court think it is important that the relevant people are notified 7 means that the court need more information to make the application, hence they have then made the order of paragraph 1 which requires the applicant to do more - this means the court can't make a decision with the current information, and need more, hence paragraph one of the order is for the applicant to do more. paragraph 3 of the order gives you the ability to have it set aside, although if it was made in january you are very late. Were you notiifed of the application or not?    
    • These are the photos of the signs. At the entrance there is a 7h free sign. On some bays there is a permit sign.  Also their official website is misleading as it implies all parking is free.  I can't be certain of the exact parking bay I was in that day, and there was no PCN ticket on my car and no other evidence was provided.  parking sign 2.pdf
    • Hi, In my last post I mentioned I had received an email from SS who were asking me to hand over the keys to my mother’s flat so they could pass them to the Law firm who have been appointed court of protection to access, secure and insure my mother’s property.  Feeling this, all quickly getting out of my hands I emailed ss requesting proof of this. I HAVEN’T HEARD BACK FROM SS.  Yesterday, I received an email (with attached court of protection order) from the Law Firm confirming this was correct (please see below a copy of this).  After reading the court of protection order I do have some concerns about it:   (a)   I only found out yesterday, the Law firm had been appointed by the court back in January.  Up until now, I have not received any notification regarding this.  (b)   Section 2   - States I am estranged from my mother.  This is NOT CORRECT    The only reason I stepped back from my mother was to protect myself from the guy (groomer) who had befriended her & was very aggressive towards me & because of my mother’s dementia she had become aggressive also.  I constantly tried to warned SS about this guy's manipulative behaviour towards my mother and his increasing aggressiveness towards me (as mentioned in previous posts).  Each time I was ignored.  Instead, SS encouraged his involvement with my mother – including him in her care plans and mental health assessments.   I was literally pushed out because I feared him and my mother’s increasing aggression towards me. Up until I stepped back, I had always looked after my mother and since her admission to the care home, I visit regularly.   .(c)    Sections -  4, 5 and 7  I am struggling to understand these as I don’t have a legal background.  I was wondering if there is anyone who might be able to explain what they mean.  It’s been a horrendous situation where I had to walk away from my mother at her most vulnerable because of; ss (not helping), scammer and groomer. I have no legal background, nor experience in highly manipulative people or an understanding of how the SS system operates, finding myself isolated, scared and powerless to the point I haven’t collected my personal belongings and items for my mother’s room in the care home.  Sadly, the court has only had heard one version of this story SS’s, and based their decision on that. My mother’s situation and the experience I have gone through could happen to anyone who has a vulnerable parent.    If anyone any thoughts on this much appreciated.  Thank you. ______________________________________________________  (Below is the Court of Protection Order)  COURT OF PROTECTION                                                                                                                                                                                   No xxx  MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005 In the matter of Name xxx ORDER Made by  Depty District Judge At xxx Made on xxx Issued on 18 January 2024  WHEREAS  1.     xxx Solicitors, Address xxx  ("Applicant”) has applied for an order under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.  2.     The Court notes (my mother) is said to be estranged from all her three children and only one, (me) has been notified.  3.     (Me) was previously appointed as Atorney for Property and Affairs for (my mother).  The Exhibity NAJ at (date) refers to (me) and all replacement Attorneys are now officially standing down.  4.     Pursuant to Rule 9.10 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 and Practice Direction 9B the Applicant 2must seek to identify at least three persons who are likely to have an interest in being notified that an application has been issues.”  The children of (my mother), and any other appointed attorneys are likely to have an interest in the application, because of the nature of relationship to (my mother).  5.     The Court considers that the notification requirements are an important safeguard for the person in respect of whom an order is sought.  6.     The Court notes that it is said that the local authority no longer has access to (my mother’s) Property.  7.     Further information is required for the Court to determine the application.  IT IS ORDERED THAT  Within 28 days of the issue date this order, the Applicant shall file a form COP24 witness statement confirming that the other children of (my mother) and any replacement attorneys have been notified of the application and shall confirm their name, address, and date upon which those persons were notified.  If the Applicant wishes the Court to dispense with any further notification, they should file a COP9 and COP24 explaining, what steps (if any) have been taken to attempt notification and why notification should be dispensed with.   Pending the determination of the application to appoint a deputy for (my mother), the Applicant is authorised to take such steps as are proportionate and necessary to access, secure and insure the house and property of (my mother).   This order was made without a hearing and without notice.  Any person affected by this order may apply within 21 days of the date on which the order was served to have the order set aside or varied pursuant to Rule 13.4 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 (“the Rules”).  Such application must be made on Form COP9 and in accordance with Part 10 Rules.              
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Struggling re Santander overdraft charges and repayment of loan.


Vixen7
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2375 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'm at the end of my tether.

I'm with Santander bank, have been for many years and had no problems.

I've had several loans with them over the years,

never defaulted,

always paid them off in time.

 

I took out a loan with them in 2015 for £6300.

Monthly repayments of £139.90.

 

Then 14 mths months ago, as many people were, I was called in for a face-to- face 'assessment' with ATOS re my PIP (been on high rate DLA for both Care and Mobility since 2003, changed to PIP in 2013 without any assessment).

 

My payments were downgraded to 'Basic' for both Mobility and Care. I therefore lost £250 per month.

 

Since then I have struggled financially and been having to use my overdraft to LIVE.

 

For over a year now, every month, I am getting to the top of my overdraft limit £1,400), never have enough money going in to pay it all off and am getting charged every month £31 for using it (£1 per day).

 

Charges which have now totalled £434, which I can ill afford.

 

I rang the loan dept at the bank to request that I pay my loan back at a lower rate each month.

 

Spent 45 mins on the phone listing my incomings and outgoings to be told at the end of it that he didn't think there was any point passing me on to the their Debt help dept to lower the loan repayments as it looked (on paper) that I have X amount of 'disposable income' each month !.

 

I pointed out that I have NO disposable income because I have been living on Santander's money-(the overdraft) for over a year, the overdraft which he could clearly see I have been 'stuck in' and cannot pay off and which they are still charging fees for every month. He said there was nothing he could do to help me.

 

the call was a waste of time.

 

Since then, I read on this forum about the fact that Banks shouldn't be taking charges from people's benefit money.

 

I am on PIP, ESA and have a smallish Occupational Pension from my previously employer.

 

My question : would the no charging of fees still be applicable in my case as I'm not soley on benefits with having the Occ Pension too ?. Would it be worth me asking for a suspension of the charges?.

 

Next question :

I am considering making an appointment and going into the bank to discuss these financial problems and ask can they add the overdraft I owe (£1,400) onto my existing loan and allow me to alter the repayments to a lower manageable rate. I would obviously take a list of my Incomings and Outgoings to the appointment. Last question, if the bank agreed to this, would it affect my Credit record which is good ?.

 

Has anyone on here been able to do the above successfully ?.

 

Thanks in advance to anyone who can assist and I'd like to say what an excellent forum this is, I've had some great advice previously and wish I had the funds to make a small donation (which I obviously haven't !).

 

PS. I should add that my bank loan is an unsecured one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

get you income out of their gubby hands

 

open a parachute account.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

get you income out of their gubby hands

 

open a parachute account.

 

Hi dx100uk. I'd thought of opening a bank account elsewhere but wouldn't the new bank want to check whether I had debts with the old bank before accepting me?.

 

Also,

although with a new bank I could have the loan repayments transferred each month to Santander, it wouldn't solve the problem of the fact that I owe them a £1,400 overdraft, which they would obviously chase me for.

 

I've tried my best to not go down the route of ending up with a bad credit rating, as it's been good for 25 years.

 

It would affect me for things in the future, eg, I pay my car insurance monthly as I've not been able to pay it in a lump sum each year. So dunno what the answer is at the moment !.

 

Cheers anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sadly I don't think you will avoid a screwed credit rating whichever way you go.

 

get your money out of their grubby hands

TAKE CONTROL OF IT..

its YOUR MONEY

 

co-op or the post office do on lime applications.

 

because you've been with them for ..XX yrs and you've let them mug you till now

satans bank wont give a monkey's about your problems.

 

there are letters in the debt collection forum of the library to

TELL THEM , they will only be getting £XX for xxMts

asking to freeze and stop penalty charges

if they don't then you sent the next letter giving them

 

they are duty bound to help you

 

but stay off the phone writing only

you need a papertrial.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again dx100uk. After reading up on the ramifications of going down the 'Bank please help me and lower my payments' route and the future problems this could cause for me, I've been on Martin Lewis 's debt advice site.

Just spent several hours on there and other sites, reading up on stuff (head's spinning) .

 

On Martin's site there are lists of other banks and organisations which do loans at MUCH better, lower interest rates and lower monthly repayments than my current one. It also gives your percentage chances of getting a loan, plus all of the APR's and terms.

 

I've therefore applied and should have an answer by tomorrow. I've applied for a more favourable loan at a far lower monthly rate I can manage, plus minimal interest (Sainsbury's Bank) and if successful, I'm going to pay off in full my current Santander loan PLUS the overdraft I owe. I'm then going to change to a different bank.

 

This will avoid the problem I didn't want to have in the future by NOT-buggerering (excuse the term) up my credit rating. Will get back to you when I hear about the loan. Cheers.

 

PS. With Sainsbury's you do not have to be in employment to secure a loan as long as your Income is above a certain amount.

Edited by Vixen7
Link to post
Share on other sites

UPDATE. Got the loan, will be in my bank in 4 days. Will then pay off the overdraft and the Santander loan :-). And will have a new loan at a much lower monthly rate and at less than a quarter of the interest Santander charge !. I will then be changing banks.

For anyone's information, First Direct do a standard account with an authorised overdraft of up to £250 with NO CHARGE for using it !.

Thanks again.

Edited by Vixen7
adding a thankyou
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...