Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell pre legal assesment again! re OHs LLoyds OD


nodeal789
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2383 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi i am writing on behalf of my partner,so around 10 years ago she went overdrawn with Lloyds and as you know the debt was sold onto Lowell,since then she got another good standing Lloyds account with planned overdraft,personal loan,interest free credit card.

 

Her credit score on clearscore.com is 400/700 and on the timeline on her credit report on clearscore the old Lloyds debt or Lowell dont show up,so she been having letters for years until 3 years ago they sent her a threat pre legal letter and she started paying £10 off the £434 remaining now £373,since stopped paying it 2 years ago they send letters all the time saying they will knock the amount down owed if you pay.

 

last week she had a pre legal assessment letter and now today post came with another letter saying 'Your Lloyds account remains unpaid,we are now deciding whethere to transfer your account to a solicitor to take legal action against you to recover this debt. so what should she do advice please as i dont want her stressed as shes pregnant and she worries.

Edited by Andyorch
Paras
Link to post
Share on other sites

There is one key question.

 

Was there a period of 6 years, where she made no payments or acknowledged the debt in writing ?

 

She might not know this, unless she has records of the date this overdraft debt was created and also the date she started paying Lowell. If there was 6 years between the date the debt was created and when she started paying Lowell, then the debt will be statute barred and could not be enforced in court if any claim was defended.

 

Lowell might issue a court claim hoping it is not defended and win by default.

 

Perhaps it is worth sending them a letter stating it is statute barred and let them prove otherwise. Advise them that 6 years passed between the date of the overdraft debt with Lloyds and any payment subsequently paid to Lowell. Lowell might not bother sending any response or admit to it being statute barred. Outside of a litigation process, they don't have to provide the information, but they should not continue to chase a debt they know is statute barred and have been asked to stop communications.

 

Nb. The other issue is that if she paid £10 a month over 3 years, why has the debt not reduced enough. They can't add interest or charges.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes the debt was ongoing before i met my partner and the debt was running for over 10 years now but she didnt pay until the 9th year and no acknowledgement in writing only a family member talked it over the phone with them on her behalf as she is no good at sorting out problems etc.would a email to them be sufficient saying statue barred or must it be in letter format

Edited by nodeal789
Link to post
Share on other sites

yes the debt was ongoing before i met my partner and the debt was running for over 10 years now but she didnt pay until the 9th year and no acknowledgement in writing only a family member talked it over the phone with them on her behalf as she is no good at sorting out problems etc.would a email to them be sufficient saying statue barred or must it be in letter format

 

Personally, i would send a letter.

 

Some on this site don't advise sending a statute barred letter, because the debt collection agency don't have to prove anything outside of them issuing a court claim. However, as your partner is pregnant, it might be advisable just to send the letter to make the position clear to Lowell. They will see that someone is aware of the issues and they might not try it on with a court claim hoping it is not defended.

 

If you click on the statute barred auto link, it takes you to a template letter.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

phone don't count so statute barred as she probably moved and this is a phishing attempt send the SB letter from the debt collection library ruddy fleecers dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...