Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx  
    • Well tbh that’s good news and something she can find out for herself.  She has no intention of peace.  I’m going to ask the thread stays open a little longer.   It seems she had not learned that I am just not the one!!!!  plus I have received new medical info from my vet today.   To remain within agreement, I need to generally ask for advice re:  If new medical information for the pup became apparent now - post agreement signing, that added proof a second genetic disease (tested for in those initial tests in the first case but relayed incorrectly to me then ), does it give me grounds for asking a court to unseal the deed so I can pursue this new info….. if she persists in being a pain ? If generally speaking, a first case was a cardiac issue that can be argued as both genetic and congenital until a genetic test is done and then a second absolute genetic only disease was then discovered, is that deemed a new case or grounds for unsealing? Make sense ?   This disease is only ever genetic!!!!   Rather more damning and indisputable proof of genetic disease breeding with no screening yk prevent.   The vet report showing this was uploaded in the original N1 pack.   Somehow rekeyed as normal when I was called with the results.   A vet visit today shows they were not normal and every symptom he has had reported in all reports uploaded from day one are related to the disease. 
    • Hi Roberto, Read some of the other threads here about S Sixes - they all follow the same routine of threats, threats, then nothing. When you do this, you'll see how many have been in exactly the same situation as you are. Keep us updated as necessary .............
    • Nationwide's takeover of Virgin Money is hitting the headlines as thousands of customers protest that they will not get a vote on whether it should happen.View the full article
    • unrelated to the agreement then, could have come from Lowells filing cabinet (who lowells - they dont do that - oh yes they do!! just look at a few lowell paypal EU court claim threads) no name and address for time of take out either which they MUST contain. just like the rest of the agreement then..utter bogroll that proves nothing toward you ... slippery lowells as usual it's only a case management discussion on 26 April 2024 at 10:00am by WebEx. thats good simply refer to the responses you made on your 4a form response only. pleanty of SPC thread here to read before the 26th i suggest you read at least one a day. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Debts no longer on Credit File scotland - can they re-appear?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2322 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

After many years of stressful negotiations, hard work and lots of help from people on here - I have had a clean Credit File for the past two years. All of my old Debts are off and I have been able to move on with my life credit wise(ly). :)

 

There are a couple of accounts still active on which I am just paying a token amount of £1 on. I wont go into the details, but basically I'm going to stop paying the token amount - my total Debts add up to about £7k over 5 or six accounts and the amounts vary from £200 to £2k.

 

Basically, I'm just going to stop paying them. They have been getting paid for around 10 years and really, I want to put it all behind me for good and move on.

 

My worry is, if I stop paying them - although they are off my Credit Account, can they reappear in the form of a CCJ etc if the DCA brings action against me?

 

I'm not asking for a morally opinionated answer, but rather a can they come back to haunt me ?

 

Thanks in advance!. Scotty

Link to post
Share on other sites

And now for my longer answer - They cant, but a DCA may try its luck by changing the default date etc

This is wrong and shouldn't happen. It happened to me with Lowell..

 

Yes a CCJ could appear but you wouldn't let that happen now would you? :)

You need to defend if it comes to it.

 

Finally tell us more about said debts... I think we could be off some help :)

  • Confused 1

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perfect answer - yes it would be aggressively defended. I have had all that nonsense thrown at me before in the past. Fear tactics, doesn't phase me. As long as they can't "legally" enforce it.

 

I did call and settle a few at 50% of the value, but now, I just want to move on.

 

Debts are 2x old mobile contracts from about 8/9 years ago, less than half the value left, banks loans and overdrafts and an old credit card, again all under 50% of original value. I think I've done my time :) All are with DCA's.

 

Provident were crackers - kept registering late payments for 4 years when it should have been defaulted. Went through the whole process with them and they refused to mark as defaulted. FOS upheld my complaint, got them to remove it, write off the value and pay me compo haha!. Only time the FOS have found in my favour right enough. Another two went all the way up to a court date before the DCA's/Solicitors gave up. Its ridiculous the tactics they pull.

 

Thanks for the info :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats fine - If they do court this time time - Rules changed on 1st October - So potentially less likely to go for it! (Maybe...)

 

Tell us who the debts are from, who they are with etc

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

haha, yes I know, can't explain it myself.

I think I had one account with £1.12 in it.

The rest were frozen. They must not have offset it.

 

British Gas had the cheek once to send me a cheque for 2p! Lol, that is a story and a half and two years of absolute hell.

 

They sent an Engineer to disconnect my supply and I invited him in and explained to him the hassle I had with them. (My wife was seriously ill).

He said, son, i'm on your side, i wish you all the best and walked out LOL!

It;s all funny looking back, but at the time, was one bloody stressful time of my life.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They can’t reappear as the original debt.

They could reappear as a CCJ ; and since you were making ‘token payments’ they won’t be statute barred.

 

They’d have to be:

a) enforceable

b) successfully taken to Court for a CCJ,

first though.

 

Any that you think they likely would get a CCJ on that they serve a claim form on : consider agreeing a Tomlin Order instead?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Bazza

 

I will just see how it goes and if it comes to the worst, make a settlement offer. I should be able to do that if they come a calling.

 

Also, I find when you dig your heels in, they tend to just fling it around like a used toy to other DCA's for whatever pence in the pound - so any offer to get it off their books should be welcomed - I would hope.

 

Will need to look into this Tomlin......

Link to post
Share on other sites

moved to the dealing with debt in Scotland forum.

 

 

just ignore them

stop panicking...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...