Jump to content


Parking Eye Walsall Incorrect Registration entered


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2257 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good morning,

 

I have recently received a parking charge notice from parking eye, to which I have appealed and provided proof of parking twice and they have rejected both times. Can you please help?

 

please answer the following questions.

 

1 Date of the infringement 06/07/17

 

2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 21/07/17

 

3 Date received 26/07/17

 

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [y/n?] Not that I can see (howver I am looking at a scanned copt at the moment could be on the rear will check later)

 

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes

 

6 Have you appealed? {y/n?] post up you appeal] Yes.

 

I am afraid I do not have a copy of my appeal but all I wrote was "Please see attached proof of parking, I accidentally enetered my old cars registration in error"

 

The above is from memory so wording may be slightly different. I attached a copy of the parking ticket.

 

Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up

 

Please see attached Dated 01st & 23rd August.

 

7 Who is the parking company? Parking Eye

 

8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Crown Wharf Shopping Park, Walsall car park

 

For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. BPA

 

 

 

If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here.

 

I received another parking charge notice, to which I appealed again the same as above then I received the below the attached dated 12th October 2017.

 

 

Many thanks for your help and support.

23 August 2017.pdf

12 October 2017.pdf

01 August 2017.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

plenty of like threads here

 

 

if their ANPR system is so crap they cant be bothered to work it out

then that's their problem.

 

had to hide your uploads

you've left ref number showing

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You dont offer us a copy of your appeal so it is difficult to suggest that the obvious approach to this would have worked at the time.

They sent the demand out too late so there was no keeper liability and they could thus get lost.

 

As you said "I" you have shot yourself in the foot.

Why didn't you come here first, you wouldn't now be scratching abound for an argument,

 

however we have one. PE have suffered no loss by your actions as the payment is a licence to park and it doesn't really matter that you input the wrong reg,

that licence still exists, just harder to show.

 

DO you have the ticket or some sort of receipt for payment?.

 

You may need to be up to this matter actually getting as far as a court claim so you can demand a copy of their machines and camera's log as part of your evidence,

they cant deny it to you.

 

There are plenty of previous cases thrown out for the same thing and PE know it.

 

They wont be in a hurry to take you to court and they know they are in the wrong, why do you think they offered to settle for £20 when they knew you owed nothing?

 

they were waiting for you to slip up

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi all,

 

Could someone possibly confirm if I should respond to the attached?

 

I am wondering if I should write to the land owner and also request a copy of the ANPR list to prove there is no loss to the land owner, if you agree is there a standard template which you would reccend using.

 

In my eyes the attached is just scare tactics as it is not from the courts.

 

Any advice would be appreciated thank you.

Parking Notice 12.01.2018.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes you need to reply within 30 days

but I don't know why PE think PAP applies to PCN's

its not a debt is DOESNT!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no rush we'll sort it

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you havent done your homewrok,

 

look up case law on incorrect registration entered into ticket machines,

 

the parking prankster's blog and web site have examples.

 

You will include the case law in any letter you do send

 

so dont be in a hurry to fire off something before you know all of the facts

Link to post
Share on other sites

not sure why you posted the other stuff and the links

you don't have a court claim...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted it because I still have a Letter Before court letter and I asked if I needed to still respond to that?

 

I also asked if I should follow the advice on the link which was provided to respond to the LBCCC.

Link to post
Share on other sites

what do you think a letter before court letter is?

nothing to do with any court at all....

who told you it was?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya

 

Letter before county court claim is notice that I am being taken to court to which you advised me above I should not ignore and must respond within 30 days,

 

what I am asking is should I still respond to this although the land owner has written to parking eye.

 

The link I posted advised how to respond to a letter before county court claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the pre action protocol does not apply to private parking speculative invoices as they are not a consumer monetary debt.

 

if you want to do anything...

send PE a copy of the proof you have the land owner does not wish to pursue the matter.

 

for want of an explanation...a letter before action or letter of claim does not mean a court case has been started or that one ever will be.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

write to PE and tell them that the LL has informed you that they have instructed PE to drop the matter

and in any case the matter of mrs X v (whoever) is case law on this matter

 

so there is no case to answer and if PE persist you will be seeking a costs order for their unreasonable conduct.

 

look up the case law on the parking pranksters web site (not blog) and use the correct names and court, date, case ref etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...