Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The move marks the first time the country's central bank has raised interest rates for 17 years.View the full article
    • The move marks the first time the country's central bank has raised interest rates for 17 years.View the full article
    • The firm has benefited from the AI boom, making it the third-most valuable company in the US.View the full article
    • Former billionaire Hui Ka Yan has been fined and banned from the financial market for life.View the full article
    • In terms of "why didn't I make a claim" - well, that has to be understood in the context of the long-standing legal battle and all its permuations with the shark. In essence there was a repo and probable fire sale of the leasehold property - which would have led to me initiating the complaint/ claim v SPF in summer 19. But there was no quick sale. And battle commenced and it ain't done yet 5y later. A potential sale morphed into trying to do a debt deal and then into a full blown battle heading to trial - based on the shark deliberately racking up costs just so the ceo can keep the property for himself.  Along the way they have launched claims in 4 different counties -v- me - trying to get a backdoor B. (Haven't yet succeeded) Simultaneously I got dragged into a contentious forfeiture claim and then into a lease extension debacle - both of which lasted 3y. (I have an association with the freeholders and handled all that legal stuff too) I had some (friend paid for) legal support to begin with.  But mostly I have handled every thing alone.  The sheer weight of all the different cases has been pretty overwhelming. And tedious.  I'm battling an aggressive financial shark that has investors giving them 00s of millions. They've employed teams of expensive lawyers and barristers. And also got juniors doing the boring menial tasks. And, of course, in text book style they've delayed issues on purpose and then sent 000's of docs to read at the 11th hour. Which I not only boringly did read,  but also simultaneously filed for ease of reference later - which has come in very handy in speeding up collating legal bundles and being able to find evidence quickly.  It's also how I found out the damning stuff I could use -v- them.  Bottom line - I haven't really had a moment to breath for 5y. I've had to write a statement recently. And asked a clinic for advice. One of the volunteers asked how I got into this situation.  Which prompted me to say it all started when I got bad advice from a broker. Which kick-started me in to thinking I really should look into making some kind of formal complaint -v- the broker.  Which is where I am now.  Extenuating circumstances as to why I'm complaining so late.  But hopefully still in time ??  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Carers allowance/ Abuse of process


spitfire1964
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2337 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Three weeks ago I got notification that my wife would not be entitled to claim for carers allowance because and at that time of the decision we were not in receipt of the disability benefits, in my case PIP.

 

Can I ask for a mandatory decision on this now as PIP has been awarded and backdated to November 2016, and would now meet the crtieria not met a few weeks back, any help as always would be appreciated. SF

Link to post
Share on other sites

worth a try

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

worth a try

 

When I was on DLA I was on the middle rate for daily living and same rate for mobility, which and I assume te middle rate would not be a qualifying rate for carers allowance, however after yesterdays judgment I was awarded the enhanced rate which would qualify for carers allowance backdated to November 2016.

 

So am I right to assume that since November 2016 carers allowance could have been claimed for, but for the DWP stating otherwise and any amount lost (carers allowance) can this be backdated from November 2016 giving the judgment made yesterday.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Happened to my neighbour

Daughter was on low mobility

Complained for years

 

Along came move to pip

Got enhanced everything

 

He got carers back dated as far as her enhanced pip

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well that is positive dx, but it makes you think that the DWP are using the disabled and most vulnerable as a means of saving money, when you take into account the funding used to object to an appeal add to that the Tribunals seem to be awarding more to Claimants in rates of benefits to what they were previously on and stopped, they the DWP are a bit backward in thinking when you look at that logic because it is costing them more in theory.

 

I have just contacted Carers Allowance and the rude person on the other end of the phone has told me that my wife needs to put in for a new claim, I explained to her that is not the case, and I will used my right to a mandatory decision to reconsider the claim as the circumstances and the criteria that was not met two weeks ago can no longer be relied upon, giving the judgment made yesterday makes the DWP wrong in not only denying PIP, but the excuse by the DWP not to award carers allowance is also now null and void because that judgment as opposed to some [edited] health assessor lies used before as a means of the DWP has been blown completely out of the water by the Tribunals decision. She did not like the facts mate

 

How did your neighbour go about claiming Carers Allowance, was it after an appeal or after any award for PIP being awarded by DWP.

 

By judging by the conversation that I had earlier with that horrible little lady employed by the DWP is that they are trying to engineer and have probably misled a few Claimants into believing any claim for Carers allowance starts from when the Tribunal adjudge the DWP were wrong in their decision, after the hearing.

 

My argument is that if the DWP were wrong in not awarding PIP, and this is the reason why they refused to award Carers allowance, they are also wrong to deny anyone carers allowance during that period of time because but for not awarding PIP and awarding PIP, Carers allowance could be claimed.

 

The DWP may have several different departments within its set up, but at the end of the day it is the DWP who are liable, not their departments.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well I'm not interested in mass conspiracies that plague certain threads...

 

 

if there was an active carers claim that was refused..

which evidence now shows would have been given if the PIP was in-place

the backdating now proving this case...

it will be backdated going by that experience I have related

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that DX,

 

So from any award of PIP, any other benefits that could have been awarded, but for the refusal of PIP could be claimed from the date PIP has been awarded and in my case by the Tribunal, got it.

 

Oh well one fire put out,

now it looks like I will have to deal with Carers Allowance now,

 

 

why the need to fight for any benefit rights, and in this day and age is beyond me, but if that is what it takes, so be it, I am not going to give into them..

 

 

Just feel so sorry for those who give up the fight but we are all different and I can see why people do, they are vulnerable and this Government are kicking the most vulnerable as a means of balancing the books, cowards and in all honesty a bit loos in the head for (a) taking this route (b) for implementing what is a vile cull of those who deserve basic rights because of how they are or what disability they have, having to fight, just for that right, because of their disability.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just phoned up Carers Allowance and further explained that I wanted to use the Mandatory period of the last refusal of not being awarded PIP and on /the provision that will now met the criteria and within the period allowed to appeal, only to be told that a mandatory period decision would take longer than putting in a for a new claim.

 

Does anyone know the period in which it normally takes the DWP to considerer a mandatory decision which now on paper should be straight forward as I was told this would normally take twelve weeks which seems a bit extreme.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My wife has now contacted the Cares Allowance Department and on three separate occasions to claim Carers Allowance of which and giving the facts, reasons and the award giving by the Tribunal would now be a formality and should not take more than five minutes to marry the two up, as all the evidence needed to fit into the criteria for Carers allowance to be awarded could and should be evidently drawn from the decision to award PIP, the proof.

 

However and on the three occasions that we have tried to get this benefit paid by exercising our right to appeal a decision before PIP was awarded, which was within the mandatory period of appealing the earlier decision not to award CA, not only are the DWP being objective in denying those significant facts that PIP has now been awarded they are slowing the process down by telling us that we cannot use the PIP as a reason to rely on to appeal the decision made three weeks ago not to award CA, which was based on the fact that we would not qualify because we were not in receipt of PIP, well we are now, use that in the reconsideration and backdate any payments owed.

 

We have been given a number of quite pathetic excuses why the above cannot be put into practice which is just another excuse for the DWP to further delay any entitlement of that benefit.

 

Yesterday we were told it would take upto 12 weeks for them to reconsider a decision that in evidence and in reality could be established in seconds, the PIP award but more of a concern and to what I believe is a complete abuse of process and a delibriate attempt to deny any right of appeal, my wife was told that she could not use the decision by the Tribunal to award PIP as evidence to support her appeal and within the window allowed so technically a reconsideration has been denied not only on an abuse of proceedings but also on the provisions laid out by the DWP which clearly rely on the fact that evidence that would support an award for CA cannot be considered which is a load of old cobblers.

 

Are we being subject to an abuse of process, from where I am sat, it would appear so, any advice would be appreciated as always.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no harm, its just seems logical to distance two different subject matters.

 

If someone has advice on the abuse of process being committed by the DWP, they are more likely to reply to that thread as opposed to a thread that in its meaning, is entirely a separate question. That is all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well I'm not interested in mass conspiracies that plague certain threads...

 

 

if there was an active carers claim that was refused..

which evidence now shows would have been given if the PIP was in-place

the backdating now proving this case...

it will be backdated going by that experience I have related

 

DX, some advice please.

 

From what I am reading with my cases manager who deals with my UC, the impression that she is giving me is that I will be no better off claiming carers allowance as and in her words it would be taking back pound for pound and credited towards the UC that I am currently in receipt off.

 

In otherwords any amount owed or that could be claimed through carers allowance goes straight in towards Uc which would mean that the weekly benefit of £62 would go towards any amount being paid in UC now.

 

It seems very confusion but am I correct or does anyone know how an award for care extra financial support not giving if you are in receipt of UC.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's worth keeping in mind that CA counts as taxable income, and entitles to equivalent NI contributions to be credited towards your pension. I could be wrong, but I don't think that's the case with other state benefits like UC, so if that's the case, you'd still be better off claiming CA even if it came to the same £ for £?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's worth keeping in mind that CA counts as taxable income, and entitles to equivalent NI contributions to be credited towards your pension. I could be wrong, but I don't think that's the case with other state benefits like UC, so if that's the case, you'd still be better off claiming CA even if it came to the same £ for £?

 

Thanks for that Bookworm it is appreciated.

 

The reason UC and service centre have indicated as a reason which seems to be a bit odd is that they are claiming the reason for this is because CA is means tested which CAB says is incorrect and should not be subject to any means test as this payment is an extra payment for the care that my wife needs to give me.

 

All very confusion but I know who I would be rather trust in their advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's worth keeping in mind that CA counts as taxable income, and entitles to equivalent NI contributions to be credited towards your pension. I could be wrong, but I don't think that's the case with other state benefits like UC, so if that's the case, you'd still be better off claiming CA even if it came to the same £ for £?

 

UC have indicated that the carers rate would £151.89 per month.

 

However claiming the same benefit and through the Carers allowance would mean that £248 could be claimed per month,obviously that is a difference of £97 per month.

 

Are we obliged or do we have to go through UC in oreder to receive CA, or can we go straight to CA for any benfits for care are concerned,

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...