Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi welcome to the Forum.  If a PCN is sent out late ie after the 12th day of the alleged offence, the charge cannot then be transferred from the driver to the keeper.T he PCN is deemed to have arrived two days after dispatch so in your case, unless you can prove that Nexus sent the PCN several days after they claim you have very little chance of winning that argument. All is not lost since the majority of PCNs sent out are very poorly worded so that yet again the keeper is not liable to pay the charge, only the driver is now liable. If you post up the PCN, front and back we will be able to confirm whether it is compliant or not. Even if it is ok, there are lots of other reasons why it is not necessary to pay those rogues. 
    • Hi 1 Date of the infringement  arr 28/03/24 21:00, dep 29/03/24 01.27 2 Date on the NTK  08/04/2024 (Date of Issue) 3 Date received Monday 15/04/24 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012?  Yes 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No  7 Who is the parking company? GroupNexus 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Petrol Station Roadchef Tibshelf South DE55 5T 'operating in accordance with the BPA's Code of Practice' I received a Parking Charge letter to keeper on Monday 15/04/24, the 17th day after the alleged incident. My understanding is that this is outside the window for notifying. The issue date was 08/04/2024 which should have been in good time for it to have arrived within the notice period but in fact it actually arrived at lunchtime on the 15th. Do I have to prove when it arrived  (and if so how can I do that?) or is the onus on them to prove it was delivered in time? All I can find is that delivery is assumed to be on the second working day after issue which would have been Weds 10//04/24 but it was actually delivered 5 days later than that (thank you Royal Mail!). My husband was present when it arrived - is a family member witness considered sufficient proof?
    • lookinforinfo - many thanks for your reply. It would be very interesting to get the letter of discontinuance. The court receptionist said that the county court was in Gloucester 'today' so that makes me think that some days it is in Gloucester and some days its in Cheltenham, it was maybe changed by the courts and i was never informed, who knows if DCBL were or not. My costs were a gallon of petrol and £3.40 for parking. I certainly don't want to end up in court again that's for sure but never say never lol. Its utterly disgusting the way these crooks can legally treat motorists but that's the uk for you. I'm originally from Scotland so it's good that they are not enforceable there but they certainly still try to get money out of you. I have to admit i have lost count of the pcn's i have received in the last 2 yr and 4 months since coming to England for work, most of them stop bothering you on their own eventually, it was just this one that they took it all the way. Like i mentioned in my WS the the likes of Aldi and other companies can get them cancelled but Mcdonalds refused to help me despite me being a very good customer.   brassednecked - many thanks   honeybee - many thanks   nicky boy - many thanks    
    • Huh? This is nothing about paying just for what I use - I currently prefer the averaged monthly payment - else i wouldn't be in credit month after month - which I am comfortable with - else I wold simply request a part refund - which I  would have done if they hadn't reduced my monthly dd after the complaint I raised (handled slowly and rather badly) highlighted the errors in their systems (one of which they do seem to have fixed) Are you not aware DD is always potentially variable? ah well, look it up - but my deal is a supposed to average the payments over a year, and i dont expect them to change payments (up or down) without my informed agreement ESPECIALLY when I'm in credit over winter.   You are happy with your smart meter - jolly for you I dont want one, dont have to have one  - so wont   I have a box that tells me my electricity usage - was free donkeys years ago and shows me everything I need to know just like a smart meter but doesnt need a smart meter,  and i can manually set my charges - so as a side effect - would show me if the charges from the supplier were mismatched. Doesn't tell me if the meters actually calibrated correctly - but neither does your smart meter. That all relies on a label and the competence of the testers - and the competence of any remote fiddling with the settings. You seem happy with that - thats fine. I'm not.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

BMW Finance/Lester Aldridge Solicitors-Two cars, excess mileage/car repo


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2385 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

it probably is as complex as it sounds, but any help would be greatly appreciated:

 

A couple of years ago, I suffered a catastrophic loss of income due to a provider with whom I had been working with for some time, went under.

The details of this are irrelevant to the questions I have for this forum I guess, but I hope it adds context to the following:

 

When I lost my income for that time, I had a number of essential commitments that my ignorance of alternatives, led to me getting into significant debt.

In spite of this, there were brief moments of clarity that allowed me to make some more sensible financial decisions,

one of which was getting rid of my petrol guzzling car that I loved almost more than life itself (ok, a bit excessive maybe).

 

The car concerned was bought from BMW on a PCP over 4 years, and this being my third from the same dealer and same salesman, I was more than happy to deal with him again.

 

As with most PCP deals, payments varied depending on the estimated mileage over term of the agreement.

the deal that attracted me was based on 8000 miles per year,

which I immediately knew might not be enough,

 

 

I asked the salesman what he would recommend;

increasing the mileage (which I wanted to do),

or increasing the payments to accommodate the extra mileage on the contract.

 

 

I told the salesman that there was a possibility that I could go considerably over the 8000 miles,

the salesman replied: "you should be fine-I'd leave it as it is, and the GFV will swallow everything up".

 

I took his advice and went ahead with my dream car, and loved every minute of owning it,

until I found myself being unable to justify keeping the car,

in spite of it being 4 months before the end of the 4 year agreement.

 

I decided to downsize and went back to BMW again and found a car that was less in monthly outgoings,

and more economical to run,

and it seemed like a great idea at the time.

 

 

I said I'd take the car, paid £1000 deposit, and that was that.

It's worth noting that I didn't sign any paperwork,

just verbally agreed that I'd take the car (although I accept that could constitute a verbal contract).

 

However, a week later, it seemed like a really bad idea,

I contacted the Dealership to say that I couldn't justify the cost,

stated that I would like to cancel the order,

as I believed I had the right to do,

with consumers as I thought,

being allowed a cooling off period.

 

Needless to say, the salesman was none too pleased,

tried to persuade me to change my mind, eventually accepted my decision.

 

 

I asked about the £1000 deposit, and he said "he'd see what he could do, but the sales manager was "too angry to ask" at that point.

 

I never got the £1000 back (though admittedly, I'm not even sure I'm entitled to it).

 

Still with my car, I decided (after some probably ill informed research), to VT the car.

It was 4 months from the end of the contract,

I had been told that VT'ing prevents the consumer from being liable for excess mileage charges (which were apparently £8000 in total).

 

I went through the process, and the car was inspected thoroughly, with a £250 bill at the end of it.

I thought that was absolutely fine, and thought that was it, until I got a letter from BMW asking for the excess mileage charge.

 

I disputed it (informally), but they were adamant,

this is where I'd become a bit overwhelmed by the impact of the loss of income,

went into ostrich mode for a short time,

the consequence of which was Lester Aldridge Solicitors becoming involved.

 

To cut a very long story long, they wouldn't budge on this, and an interim charging order was placed on the family home.

 

I needed another car,

was back working,

managed to get one.

 

 

I was really happy with it,

set up the Direct Debit,

signed the forms,

drove the car home.

 

Despite my happiness,

I was probably using that to deflect from the suffocating effects of trying to sort out my debt,

and again, I must admit that my connection with "real life" was suffering somewhat at that time.

 

It transpired that my DD for what I can see as no reason whatsoever, wasn't honoured by my bank, I didn't realise, resulting in 3 missed payments.

Again, I m not trying to absolve myself of blame,

however I hadn't remembered receiving any letters about this.

 

I eventually did phone the finance company

(which turned out to be that same finance company that oversaw my previously,

i.e. the same finance company who were pursuing me for excess mileage charges),

 

 

I spoke to an incredibly condescending chap called "Andy".

I explained to Andy thread through needle my financial issues at that time,

also spoke about the distress it had and was causing me (which was really bloody hard to do).

 

 

I did have a little bit of money available, and made the offer of paying two of the three payments outstanding, and to pay the third outstanding payment within the following month (as in the following 4 weeks).

His reply was "nope, you've got to pay everything outstanding".

 

 

I persisted and again put forward my offer, and again recounted the previous 12 months and the difficulties I'd faced during that time,

again said "nope, you've got to pay the full amount outstanding by the end of the month (which was two weeks from the date of the phone call).

 

 

As I felt I wasn't going anywhere with this call, and as I was unaware of anything else I could do about this,

I said "I guess I'm going to see what I can do",

to which I received the response

"Ok, you've been talking to Andy, you have a nice day now, yeah".

My back was well and truly up.

 

Needless to say, at that time, I wasn't able to find that third payment,

two weeks after the "deadline" passed, my wife woke me up and said "someone's here to take the car-you better get up" (it was approximately 7am).

 

 

Completely bleary eyed and in my dressing gown,

a man was there with a recovery vehicle,

holding a sheet of paper, saying "I'm here to take your car".

 

 

I was floored yet again, and it took a moment for me to utter anything remotely coherent in the direction of this guy.

 

I said to him "is there any way I can avoid this? I need my car for work and I've already tried to negotiate a repayment of the outstanding payments".

He said "that's not up to me-you'd have to contact the finance company itself" (which I guess is fair enough".

Completely unaware of any rights I may/may not have,

 

 

I asked the recovery guy "do I have any choice in this?",

to which he replied "No",

"I said what do I have to do?"

and he said "you could give me the keys to the car".

I handed the car keys over and he pulled the car off my drive.

 

 

Humiliated doesn't even begin to cover it, nor devastated.

I had a 40 mile trip to work and a morning school run to try and factor in with no car.

We managed to work something out, which was at great financial expense (trains, taxi's etc..),

but eventually we managed to get a car

(in my wife's name, and bless her, I was probably as devastated at bringing this to her door, as anything else).

 

I immediately phoned the finance company,

explained what had happened,

I was met with a girl/lady who I think was called "Davina".

 

 

Now this person wasn't condescending,

she was rude,

in fact aggressive at points during the conversation,

 

 

at one point, although paraphrasing, essentially called me a liar when speaking about the circumstances leading up to the repossession.

 

 

I questioned the legality of the repossession man taking the car off my drive,

she said aggressively "YOU HANDED YOUR KEYS OVER-HE CAN DO WHAT HE WANTS".

 

 

I explained my financial circumstances and said I hadn't recalled any letters being received about missed payments,

she said "WE DON'T HAVE TO PROVE THAT YOU'VE RECEIVED IT-WE JUST HAVE TO PROVE THAT WE'VE SENT IT".

 

 

Now whether she's right or wrong about any of this,

her manner was absolutely disgraceful,

and this being at a time when I was in a very dark place

(which again, is very very hard for me to say).

 

The sum total of all of this, and again, so as not to be firing the burden of responsibility completely at the door of others,

I became the archetypal ostrich, and found it really hard to respond to anything,

 

 

several months later, I received a demand for £11k from Lester Aldridge Solicitors acting on behalf of the finance company.

This has resulted in a further Interim Charging Order on the house,

I do take responsibility for this,

due to me feeling completely frozen and overwhelmed by the whole situation,

and not really knowing where to turn.

 

I have a relatively good income again now,

I've managed to pull myself out of this hole (I've no idea how),

have gone through Stepchange and they have been really helpful,

with some structure and order to my debts,

along with no longer dreading the postman proving to be a huge stress reducer,.

 

 

The whole business with the car finance company however leaves me with some concerns, also a huge sense of injustice.

 

 

I VT'd my car because I genuinely couldn't continue to run it,

when I realised I was behind on my payments with the following car,

made what I thought was a reasonable offer of repayment

(I thought the finance company are obliged to listen to and consider the offer, along with negotiating repayment if they weren't happy with the offer?).

 

I'm sorry it's a long read

I hope people will be able to offer me some advice on this,

if there are any other questions raised,

I'd be happy to answer them.

 

Cheers.

Edited by Sunraged
Link to post
Share on other sites

that's BMW finance for you

never been any different.

 

 

you stupidly handed the keys over

when you had no need too

 

 

cant see there's anything you can do

bar look at reclaiming any stupid insurances PPI and FEES

 

 

get an sar off get all the paperwork on all agreements.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...