Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The argument about the date of receipt is now dead because the PCN  does not comply with the wording  of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  First reason Section 9 [2] [e]  "state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper—(i)to pay the unpaid parking charges;" Second Reason Section 9 [2][a] "specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates;" All your PCN does is mark the time you entered and left the car park. It does not include all the myriad things you do in between-driving into the car park, looking for a parking space-perhaps a disabled space or  parent and Child place@ getting the children or disabled person out of the car then going shopping. Coming back; loading the car with shopping [, getting the children or disabled into the car, taking the trolley back to the store; driving to the exit perhaps stopping to let vehicles/pedestrians cross in front of you etc. so subtracting the driving times from before and after parking can make quite a difference from their time to the actual period parking time. So the upshot is now that only the driver is responsible for paying the PCN and the keeper is not liable at all even if the name of the driver is never known by Nexus so well done for not appealing. You obviously want to keep it that way to make it very difficult for them to win in Court if it ever goes that far. Although your question is now moot since  the same objective has been achieved by the non compliant PCN [ie no keeper liability] just  about the only way to dispute the timing of the PCN would be if one kept the envelope and there was a discernible date stamp on it that did not match the date on the PCN. There is a new Act coming out [and it cannot come quickly enough ] and one of the things required is that parking companies will have to prove the date of sending out their PCNs. We are not the only ones who sometimes doubt the veracity of their dates particularly as the later it is sent [unlawfully] the shorter the period motorists have to benefit [?] from the reduced payment. I haven't seen it on your posts but do you know how long you are permitted to park for free?
    • I was so annoyed and frustrated about the fact this case was lost it's been floating around my head all night. Dave962, are you sure that's what the Judge said? .... It doesn't make sense. Did the judge in fact dismiss the case on the grounds that the defendant did not make an appeal within 28 days? Effectively telling the PPC about the error entering the registration number and providing proof of payment at that time? To me, that's an important point.  
    • The United Autoworkers Union took a risk in a Republican - and often anti-union - part of the US.View the full article
    • good spot...though i'm unsure, but it does seem like it can't be related to this latest issue as the OP mentions she knew nothing about the  order. dx  
    • wasn't that for the CCJ for the mental capacity with the leaseholder?   SO would be different to this.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2384 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

went in to get a prescription filled

On my way out had a browse of things!

 

I was reading some stuff on an information leaflet from inside the box,

put everything back and went to leave,

 

I was stopped by security (non uniformed)

He told me he had been watching me etc.

told me he knew I was trying to shoplift (I wasn't)

 

said he had seen me put stuff in my bag,

which was my prescription!

Called the manager over, checked my bags etc.

did all of this in the middle of the store!

 

In the end I was let go and told I was banned from the store,

They never took any details, not even my name!

I had gotten my prescription filled there.

 

Was just wondering,

can they use the information from my prescription?

Even if they didn't take my name?

Will anything happen?

Edited by sastley443
Link to post
Share on other sites

Why not write to the store manager and explain the above, and if he fails to answer satisfactorily get the area managers details and escalate the complaint.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately they, the store, can ban anyone from their store.

However they should of had..

Reasonable suspicion..... They did.

But at what point did they stop you?

With them having a suspicion of a concealment they can but they should of done tho in private but they walk a fine line of legally detaining you and accusations of false imprisonment and possibly extortion.

The police should of been called.

 

Write a strong letter to head office stating what happened and you are seeking legal advice on a cause of action for harassment and false imprisonment

Link to post
Share on other sites

Letter to Store Manager demanding an apology and copied to the CEO's office at Superdrug HO

 

SCONE does not appear to have been applied - the guard should have had continuous observation and should therefore have been in a position to see that you had collected a prescription and put this in your bag, not shelf stock

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

whist you are at it you can ask the store manager whether the individual has their own SIA licence or whether Superdrug rely on approved contractors and if so what is the name of the company. If this persons main role is security/surveillance then they need a SIA licnce in their own name and possiby their employer needs one as well (that will be at director level) In short, you have considerable leverage for a proper apology and a nice box of choccies or bunch of flowers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Superdrug don't have their own 'in house' security, so any store detectives should be sia licenced.

 

They used 'stealth security' as their suppliers a couple of years ago, I don't know who has the contract currently, might still be stealth. From memory, Lidl used them as well.

 

Although I totally agree this should be complained about, I don't agree its false imprisonment or a false arrest - the conversation was conducted on the shop floor, you weren't taken hold of, or taken to the office, and the immortal words weren't uttered.

 

OP - Is there absolutely anything that the security could of interpreted as criminal about your conduct in the store. The packaging you opened (I'm assuming from a shelf, or was it your prescription), it wasn't sealed was it (thinking criminal damage) ?.

 

Just don't want you potentially opening a an of worms if there's anything you could of possibly done wrong in store.

 

 

 

And no, pharmacists wont usually tell anyone who you are - they have confidentiality clauses and could get struck off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 year ago, I was stopped in one of the Superdrug shops in Glasgow, security guard kept on following me round the shop, and he didn't see the bottle of Fanta twist in my back pocket

 

As I was leaving the shop, I took the bottle of juice out of my pocket, and he noticed this, and I was ushered into the shop, and he claimed I haven't paid for the juice. Doh it wasn't bought in here, but rather my work place, don't think he expected me to reply, which I did

 

Told him, I work in retail, and for him to stop me he has to be 100% I haven't paid for the item; so I asked him, did he see me go any where near the fridges, he couldn't answer this for me, as he was tailing me round the shop, so sometimes he lost sight of me, so I told him I leaving as I haven't done anything wrong

 

3 Weeks later returned and entered the shop, and was told I was barred, wasn't happy with this, as I haven't done anything wrong,

I wanted to do something about this.

 

I went to my local Superdrug store,

where I knew the manager personally,

who was at school with me.

 

The manager contacted head office,

and with in a matter of days,

an apology was sent through the post with a £20 gift card.

The security guard wasn't sacked, but rather moved to another store

 

Checked with the security manager in my work at the time,

on why I was stopped and followed round the shop;

he believed my eyes look shifty,

and I don't directly look at people,

so the two things for the security guard might have been a concern for him

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...