Jump to content


Asset/?claimform - old lending stream PDL


pmhcfc
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2370 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

Been a while since I posted after being very active here once upon a time..

.about 6 years ago I got a few pay day loans (marriage split at the time, living away)

 

At the time none of these places were doing the correct checks to see if you could afford the repayments.

 

Wonga have previously written off £900 with me for the same reason...

One or two others haven't bothered.

Lending Stream sold this particular one to Asset and they've been chasing ever for a while...

 

They have now taken me to court,

despite my repeated requests for proof that the correct credit checks were carried out

(I couldn't afford to repay the debts at the time as had too many going on)

P

, they simple ignored all my requests and I now have court date.

 

As you can see from below,p

they aren't bothering to send anyone as the debt is such a small amount (as they say).

 

My argument here is still that they haven't proved the correct checks were carried out..

.Is this going to be ok to go to the judge with?

 

Also going to say that loan might be small in their eyes but it isn't in mine and I have taken a day off work to attend...

 

This is their letter to the judge ...

They have (what they say) is the original agreement

- was online so not sure how I can prove otherwise.

 

I write in regard to above case and the hearing that has been listed for the ******

 

The Claimant respectfully begs your Honour to excuse the Claimant’s non-attendance in person and kindly ask your Honour to accept this letter as written notice of non-attendance in accordance with CPR Rule 27.9 1(a).

 

We hasten to add that no disrespvectfulness is intended by our non-attendance,

but we wish to save costs having particular regard to the fact that the claim is small.

We ask the court in accordance with CPR 27.9 (1) © to deal with this application in our absence.

 

We wish to ask your Honour to consider the reasons set out within our Witness Statement attached as to why the Claimant does not agree with the Defendants defence.

 

In light of this the Claimant humbly asks your Honour to dismiss the Defendants defence and enter Judgment for full balance immediately.

 

We also add that we have not received any documentation from the Defendant in support of his defence for the hearing.

 

Please also be advised that a copy if this Witness Statement and Evidence has been sent to the Defendant via email.

 

We thank you for your time in this matter and look forward to hearing from you in due course.

 

With regards,

Just hate every DCA out there

Link to post
Share on other sites

So what were the particulars of their claim?...what defence did you submit ?....what did you put in your witness statement ?

 

Have you done a witness statement and complied with court directions ?

 

No use posting the last sentence of the book unless we know the full story with chapters.

 

The following thread will outline how you should have dealt with the claim......PS. the exact same letter you posted above is also used.

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?478434-Asset-Collections-claimform-Multiple-Lending-Stream-PDls-in-one-claim/page5&highlight=Asset+Collections

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Note:- (The Claimant respectfully begs your Honour to excuse the Claimant’s non-attendance in person and kindly ask your Honour to accept this letter as written notice of non-attendance in accordance with CPR Rule 27.9 1(a).)

 

What a load of unconcianable bullsxxx, pathetic worded as per a child may write, if I was a DJ and see that I would question the audacity of such a mumble jumble and put me on the wrong side before the hearing. = Pathetic is the watch word here.

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

+1^

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is how you serve notice in accordance with CPR Rule 27.9 1(a)...okay its a little cheesy and creepy but the format is correct ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Fact is I dont think Asset collections have any intention of Attending court and are relying on the court to rubber stamp their claim.

 

If you can you need to Attend.

If only to cast any doubt to Their Claim.

 

But as you Have been asked.

 

1, Did you enter a defence ?

 

2, Did you receive their Witness Statement ?

 

3, How Did you respond to their Witness Statement.

 

Let us Know please

 

+3

 

Oh by the way

This Company does not,in, My experience respond anything.

 

Be that a Directions Questionaire

 

Or Witness statements

 

Or comply with Judge's Directions on case management.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Fact is I dont think Asset collections have any intention of Attending court and are relying on the court to rubber stamp their claim.

 

If you can you need to Attend. If only to cast any doubt to Their Claim.

 

 

But as you Have been asked.

 

1, Did you enter a defence ?

 

2, Did you receive their Witness Statement ?

 

3, How Did you respond to their Witness Statement.

 

Let us Know please

 

They are not attending ..hence their Notice served pursuant to CPR Rule 27.9 1(a) (see above)

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Sorry

 

Have not been able to get back here until now.

Yes,I did enter a defence.

 

 

I have said all along to them that there was a complaint in against the original lenders re irresponsible lending.

That got ignored and with this lot

 

 

I've told them the same and also asked them several times to produce the proof that the correct credit checks were carried out....nada

 

I will tell and show all the above to the judge and make a point that I've bothered to turn up, unlike them....

Unless there's something more I can go with?

Just hate every DCA out there

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afraid I have got my dates mixed up.

For some reason in my mind I was going to court 16/11/17..

.I got the month wrong and it's actually tomorrow...Jesus H....

 

I've been going through all the old stuff I have and it's interesting that on the 2nd April 2013 they send me an email saying they happy to waive interest etc and would accept £10 per month til it's paid (they'd reduced it to less than £200 - original amount borrowed was £110),

 

 

I agreed on the basis that they answer my complaint re irresponsible lending yet 6 days later they sent me another Email saying they couldn't collect the [original] amount due so they had no choice but to give the debt to Muck Hall...

 

 

.I wrote to them again about this, they ignored and after telling Muck Hall til I was blue in face about it, next thing I know it's with Asset and it's going to court for an amount of nearly £350.

 

Just hate every DCA out there

Link to post
Share on other sites

but you filed your witness statement yes?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well I've a few hours if you have

 

if you want to scan up their WS+exhibits

and your WS +exhibits

 

each to ONE MULTIPAGE PDF ONLY!

 

read the upload guide

i'll see if my brain helps.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll see if I can do just that but I can't seem to find my WS ? Very confused...I think I've gone about this in a rather naive way and I fear for myself...

 

I'll see if I can upload now

 

Regards

Just hate every DCA out there

Link to post
Share on other sites

well I hope its not like your Sherlock Holmes defence....:|

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, I'm sorry about all this- so disorganised it must wind you up something chronic...

 

I will try and sort these PDFs, if I cant do it in the next 15 mins then I'll just have to call it quits and go to court with what I can...

Just one thing I notice as I try to do this..

 

 

.On their court documents they say this:

On and with effect from 21 June 2016 the assignor assigned to Asset Collections & Investigations (Assignee) all its rights, title, interest and benefits in and to the Assigned Documents and the Debt.

 

yet on the original Emails , it says this....

On and with effect from 23rd August 2016 the Lending Stream LLC assigned to Asset Collection & investigation limited all its rights, title, interest and benefits in and to the Assigned Documents and the Debt.

 

confused....

Just hate every DCA out there

Link to post
Share on other sites

wouldnt worry about that.

they are indicating [wrongly] they wont be attending

I expect they will.

 

 

what you need to remember is no comms you have had with the original creditor nor any DCA since

other than the claimant and their solicitor makes any odd unless you have copies and have sent these as an exhibit and referred to them in your WS.

 

 

its difficult to understand who you've called, emailed or written too

but nothing that is not included by either party in the WS can be referred too.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

doubt it..

 

 

have they provided any agreements or documentation...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had a very understanding judge today. He has given me a week to get a proper (and correct) WS in to the court and the other party.

 

I am way too tired to get this done tonight but I'll be back on over the next couple of days to work on it, post it here and see what you think. Their WS, I notice, contains some untruths and even spelling errors...Think I can tear it apart, if just a little bit :)

 

Thanks again

Just hate every DCA out there

Link to post
Share on other sites

need to action post 14 then

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...