Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • we have known for a very very long time that 9/10 the OC never knows IRRWW are chasing debtors nor  in some cases even taking money from them that the OC never ever see!! IDRWW pockets it -  free money - lets all go on a staff holiday. there was an article some years back whereby that quoted some +£4M debtors had paid to IDRWW on UAE debts that when contacted the originating banks knew nothing about....😎  
    • let the ombudsman do their job. you'll win handsdown you dont obv owe OVO p'haps anything at all.  dont worry about Past Due credit or any other DCA ( THEY ARE NOT BAILIFFS!) as for you being added to the debt, thats quite OK, you were a resident adult and equally liable under law. once you start getting things moving via the  ombudsman dont forget to get your credit files cleansed of any negative data & seek compensation for distress etc, again the  ombudsman should sort both out for you. as you are now NOT a customer of OVO, there is very very little they can do to you now.  
    • A question - did you use the supermarket or the restaurant? I see the restrictions are different. Sign.pdf
    • DN is ok DCA NOA is ok, though not one from Newday saying they've sold it. agreement states esigned on a sunday at 11am?? really??  but no typed names or tick box nor any IP address used. if the date is correct then poss ok, it that your correct address for that time of take out? but if not, then that could simply be a copy of someone elses they've used with you details copy'n'pasted over theirs. the agreement details separate T&C's in at least 8.4. a full set of T&C containing your correct address for the time MUST be included. failure renders the agreement unenforceable... have you the T&C's too? dx
    • Npower and Scottish Power and others have always had regulations that require them to treat customers fairly - the threads here and my experiences demonstrate that those regs are little more than useless.   Even Octopus recently spent month after month saying they needed to increase my monthly payments despite my credit balance slowly going up TWICE I had to reset it online back to prior payment as they unilaterally increased it unilaterally. Raised formal complaint and they than said i was paying too much and reduced the payment, again without my agreement, although that time at least they told me they were doing it.   .. and Octopus has been one of the better ones.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

What is the point of checking your credit file??


robingetz
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2377 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

You are encouraged to check your credit file and when you query anything that you don't recognise you always get the same bull from the CRA "We have been advised that this is correct", not interested.

 

I was recently refused an overdraft from my bank, despite having a loan and credit card with them

 

I was informed after the online application that something reported by call credit was the reason,

 

I phone the bank and asked them the reason,

they said to contact call credit which I did,

who told me to contact my bank.

Being fobbed off from all ends.

 

My credit report has nothing on it to suggest why i was declined,

everything paid on time,

never over my limits,

salary going into the bank every month etc.

 

the bank won't tell me why and call credit won't tell me why.

No adverse reasons from the other 2, only call credit.

 

Also, I know credit scores are just a guide but experian and equifax are showing "Fair" while call credit shows "very poor" and have been stuck on the same score with them for 6 months, what's that all about?

 

Is it not my legal right to know why I have been refused credit?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is your legal right to apply for the detailed entry that shows “very poor”, and to see if it contains errors.....

 

If it is factually correct then it is up to the lender to apply their own tools to reach their decision.

 

Other reasons to check your credit file is to ensure you recognise all the entries and haven’t been a victim of identity theft.

Link to post
Share on other sites

neither the bank or call credit will let me know the exact reason or what exactly was reported by call credit for the refusal (They only said "something" reported by call credit, NOT specifically what that "something is").

 

No late payment,

no defaults,

no unauthorised overdraft,

no over limits on credit cards,

loans paid on time,

not a lot of credit applications.

No reason that I can see.

 

All I want the bank to say to me is

"The reason you were refused the overdraft is ("this entry on your credit file") that ONLY call credit have reported.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The credit agency don’t know why the bank refused you, they only provide the bank with the report.

 

The bank know which entry(/entries) is/are the problem, but don’t reveal this information, deeming it to be “commercially sensitive”, so people can’t work out their lending algorithms and “adjust” their applications accordingly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How long have you been on voters where you are?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

credit cards paid on time

- if you are paying mimimum amount that will ring alarm bells with anyone thinking of loaning you money.

Also what about other parts of the credit report that you dont get any detail of in the online version,

if someone has been looking at your file every week for the last 6 months it is assumed that this is for a good reason

so like with a lot of credit applications not gone through with will have a negative impact.

 

 

Now some of the more dubious dca's like to do this just to shred peoples credit when they have been stymied in their attempts to cash cow people so it could be a revenge searching patterm. You can get this removed

 

get the full version by paying the statutory £2 fee

Link to post
Share on other sites

God this site really opens your eyes.

Surely these dca's are acting maliciously and please don't tell me it's not illegal.

 

You can get banged up for calling someone a fat tart on social media and yet this filth can wreck somebody's life because they feel miffed.

 

Why hasn't somebody raised an online petition to get the government to take a look at this if it's a known practise?

 

I'm in the late autumn of my life so it doesn't affect me.

But when I think of some of the things I have put myself through for this country and then find out was to keep firms like this safe it makes me think how stupid I have been.

Link to post
Share on other sites

its not illegal [criminal] its consumer law civil - unlawful...

but no its not sadly.

 

 

its what DCA's do.

as they are in all truth totally powerless

they are NOT BAILIFFS

 

 

debt collection is the biggest section of the banking industry.

 

 

if everyone simply stopped paying a DCA

the whole industry will collapse tomorrow.

 

 

sadly 99.9% of the UK population are dump enough to fall for their IF MAYBE MIGHT COULD INSTRUCTED letters

that don't say will anywhere and blindly get cash cowed on debts they don't even owe.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

At my current address for 10 years

 

credit cards paid on time

- if you are paying mimimum amount that will ring alarm bells with anyone thinking of loaning you money.

Also what about other parts of the credit report that you dont get any detail of in the online version,

if someone has been looking at your file every week for the last 6 months it is assumed that this is for a good reason

so like with a lot of credit applications not gone through with will have a negative impact.

 

Now some of the more dubious dca's like to do this just to shred peoples credit when they have been stymied in their attempts to cash cow people so it could be a revenge searching patterm. You can get this removed

 

get the full version by paying the statutory £2 fee

 

I always pay more than the minimum amount, and have been for the last 2 years.

 

I wasn't aware that we are not shown everything on the free version of the credit report, so what's the point of it.

 

Even a questionable entry that you challenge is ignored by the CRA, they sprout the usual "we have been informed that it is correct, so we can't remove it"

Link to post
Share on other sites

well, spend £6 and get a copy from each of the 3 main agencies and see what they say

rather than bemoaning the lack of detail on a free web based version

 

Dont forget, anything that is reported that isnt true can land the company putting it on your file with a massive bill via Durkin v DSG.

 

look out of stuff that belongs to people with a similar name, DOB etc.

 

You may need to SAR the bank as well, they may be confusing you with someone else, quite common

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Call credit have confirmed that exactly the same information is shown on both the free Noddle and their £2 reports,

so I don't see the point of paying for something I can get free.

 

For some one who appears so upset by the current situation it is strange that £2 is stopping you from investigating further. Call credit may not be telling you the whole truth about the free info. and the paid info. And EB has already pointed out some things that differ between the two types of report. There must be a problem some where if your credit score is "very poor".

 

I note that you have a loan and a credit card and that you have always paid what is owed each month on time. However that may mean that while you are managing your finances well, your underlying ability to finance the extra overdraft may be a stretch too far.In fact there are so many reasons why banks turn down applications -

1] warning signs that you are using your credit card at the end of the month when your bank funds are low could be cause for concern for example.

2]Perhaps it is felt that despite the fact that you are earning good money it is felt that you are rather profligate with it and not putting some aside for a rainy day.

3] the amount you want for your overdraft is a bit on the high side taking into account your other financial commitments

4] overdrafts are put in place for at least a year and maybe the bank feels that your near future capacity to finance your existing debts could be in jeopardy -brexit is looming and interest rates may well rise in the new year which may affect your loan and c/card repayments. [You don't say if you have a mortgage with another finance house].

 

Of course none of the above may be applicable to you and as your bank is not saying, for the sake of £2 you might find the reason in the paid report.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...