Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is the other sign  parking sign 1a.pdf
    • 4 means that they need to name and then tell the people who will be affected that there has been an application made, what the application relates to (specificially "whether it relates to the exercise of the court’s jurisdiction in relation to P’s property and affairs, or P’s personal welfare, or to both) and what this application contains (i.e what order they want made as a result of it) 5 just means that teh court think it is important that the relevant people are notified 7 means that the court need more information to make the application, hence they have then made the order of paragraph 1 which requires the applicant to do more - this means the court can't make a decision with the current information, and need more, hence paragraph one of the order is for the applicant to do more. paragraph 3 of the order gives you the ability to have it set aside, although if it was made in january you are very late. Were you notiifed of the application or not?    
    • These are the photos of the signs. At the entrance there is a 7h free sign. On some bays there is a permit sign.  Also their official website is misleading as it implies all parking is free.  I can't be certain of the exact parking bay I was in that day, and there was no PCN ticket on my car and no other evidence was provided.  parking sign 2.pdf
    • Hi, In my last post I mentioned I had received an email from SS who were asking me to hand over the keys to my mother’s flat so they could pass them to the Law firm who have been appointed court of protection to access, secure and insure my mother’s property.  Feeling this, all quickly getting out of my hands I emailed ss requesting proof of this. I HAVEN’T HEARD BACK FROM SS.  Yesterday, I received an email (with attached court of protection order) from the Law Firm confirming this was correct (please see below a copy of this).  After reading the court of protection order I do have some concerns about it:   (a)   I only found out yesterday, the Law firm had been appointed by the court back in January.  Up until now, I have not received any notification regarding this.  (b)   Section 2   - States I am estranged from my mother.  This is NOT CORRECT    The only reason I stepped back from my mother was to protect myself from the guy (groomer) who had befriended her & was very aggressive towards me & because of my mother’s dementia she had become aggressive also.  I constantly tried to warned SS about this guy's manipulative behaviour towards my mother and his increasing aggressiveness towards me (as mentioned in previous posts).  Each time I was ignored.  Instead, SS encouraged his involvement with my mother – including him in her care plans and mental health assessments.   I was literally pushed out because I feared him and my mother’s increasing aggression towards me. Up until I stepped back, I had always looked after my mother and since her admission to the care home, I visit regularly.   .(c)    Sections -  4, 5 and 7  I am struggling to understand these as I don’t have a legal background.  I was wondering if there is anyone who might be able to explain what they mean.  It’s been a horrendous situation where I had to walk away from my mother at her most vulnerable because of; ss (not helping), scammer and groomer. I have no legal background, nor experience in highly manipulative people or an understanding of how the SS system operates, finding myself isolated, scared and powerless to the point I haven’t collected my personal belongings and items for my mother’s room in the care home.  Sadly, the court has only had heard one version of this story SS’s, and based their decision on that. My mother’s situation and the experience I have gone through could happen to anyone who has a vulnerable parent.    If anyone any thoughts on this much appreciated.  Thank you. ______________________________________________________  (Below is the Court of Protection Order)  COURT OF PROTECTION                                                                                                                                                                                   No xxx  MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005 In the matter of Name xxx ORDER Made by  Depty District Judge At xxx Made on xxx Issued on 18 January 2024  WHEREAS  1.     xxx Solicitors, Address xxx  ("Applicant”) has applied for an order under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.  2.     The Court notes (my mother) is said to be estranged from all her three children and only one, (me) has been notified.  3.     (Me) was previously appointed as Atorney for Property and Affairs for (my mother).  The Exhibity NAJ at (date) refers to (me) and all replacement Attorneys are now officially standing down.  4.     Pursuant to Rule 9.10 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 and Practice Direction 9B the Applicant 2must seek to identify at least three persons who are likely to have an interest in being notified that an application has been issues.”  The children of (my mother), and any other appointed attorneys are likely to have an interest in the application, because of the nature of relationship to (my mother).  5.     The Court considers that the notification requirements are an important safeguard for the person in respect of whom an order is sought.  6.     The Court notes that it is said that the local authority no longer has access to (my mother’s) Property.  7.     Further information is required for the Court to determine the application.  IT IS ORDERED THAT  Within 28 days of the issue date this order, the Applicant shall file a form COP24 witness statement confirming that the other children of (my mother) and any replacement attorneys have been notified of the application and shall confirm their name, address, and date upon which those persons were notified.  If the Applicant wishes the Court to dispense with any further notification, they should file a COP9 and COP24 explaining, what steps (if any) have been taken to attempt notification and why notification should be dispensed with.   Pending the determination of the application to appoint a deputy for (my mother), the Applicant is authorised to take such steps as are proportionate and necessary to access, secure and insure the house and property of (my mother).   This order was made without a hearing and without notice.  Any person affected by this order may apply within 21 days of the date on which the order was served to have the order set aside or varied pursuant to Rule 13.4 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 (“the Rules”).  Such application must be made on Form COP9 and in accordance with Part 10 Rules.              
    • Unless I've got an incorrect copy of the relevant regulation: The PCN is only deemed to have arrived two days after dispatch "unless the contrary is proved" in which case date of delivery does matter (not just date of posting) and I would like clarification of the required standard of proof. It seems perhaps this hasn't been tested. Since post is now barcoded for the Post Office's own tracking purposes perhaps there is some way I can get that evidence from the Post Office...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

cex in swansea sold me faulty 2nd hand graphics card


badboy09
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2393 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi there ladies and gents ,

 

i recently purchased a 2nd hand 4 gig graphics card from cex in swansea for £150 , for my wifes birthday ,

 

she brought it home and then took her computer and her new graphics card to a local computer shop to have it installed correctly

 

with in a couple of days , her power supply unit in her computer blew up ,

we took it back the computer shop and they did a test on it ,

 

found out it was the graphics card i bought from cex in swansea ,

the owner of the computer shop then suggested leaving the card with him so he can do a overnight test on it , to see if it did the same to his computers in his shop , we left it there for 2 days

 

in that time , it had blown 2 of his power supply units to ,

he explained it was the graphics card at fault ,

 

we took it back to the shop in swansea ,

who then explained they would have to test it themselves ,

after 30 mins , the cex staff came back and told us everything was fine with it , and we were refused a refund ,

 

i explained that it was within 28 days and i was entitled to a refund under the "short time to reject" option ( consumer rights told me about that one)

they blatantly refused a refund and told me if i wish to sell it back to them , they would offer me £60 ,

no matter how many times i explained that it was faulty he refused to accept that ,

 

i am now in the process of getting a letter written up by the computer repair shop with proof that it is faulty ,

is there a template available i can send to them demanding a refund

 

, i have also put in for a chargeback on my card via my bank in regards to this as well ,

i just want to have all my bases covered when i go at them again ,

 

i was also informed by consumer rights that i could claim consequential losses in regards to having to replace the psu unit in my wifes computer as well because of this .

 

any help would be appreciated

 

badboy09 :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

What the power of the psu unit your suggesting its blown?

Not all psu units are equal.

You need to do some maths to find out usage/ demands.

 

I can understand your story but the thing that niggles me s the shop you left it to be tested In claim its blown two psu's and I find that hard to believe.

The shop Is down two units which they could of sold.

 

All the retailer has to do is hook it up and it works fine. Under strain the graphics card increases power needed therefore its necessary to know the output of your psu to know if its adequate to run all systems under strain.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the psu that was in my wifes computer was a 750 watt , and the only thing my wife ever does on her computer is browse the internet and play guild wars 2 , which should be enough , the owner of the computer shop is a friend of mine and had offered to test it out on his computers ( he uses his computers fir bit mining )

Link to post
Share on other sites

This Is what u need to do

1) total wattage. That'll tell you how much it'll put out CPU rails + all other outputs combined.

2) CPU wattage. Subtract that from the total wattage. That's how much is left for everything else.

3) On the label, under the 12v area, if it ONLY has one box with some (Volts x Amps = watts), then it's a single rail design. If it has two of those sections, it's a multi-rail design. And this is where you need to add up some stuff. Just some rough numbers:

 

a) About 50w for the motherboard itself. If you have other cards plugged in OTHER than the GPU, figure about 10w each for those (ie: extra NIC, etc).

b) about 10w for hard drives.

c) For the GPU, it has two 6pin connectors if I'm not mistaken, which means those are good for 75w each PLUS the 75w it can draw from the board. That means you're looking at potentially 225W of card. It might not actually -take- that much but you have to look worst case.

 

So - add up your usage for the CPU (rated TDP), your 12v usage (everything else), 50w MOBO, and 225w for the GPU (worst case) and it -should- (for ideal efficiency) be about 50-70% of your max PSU rated wattage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you returned it did they demonstrate it working OK or did you just have to take their word for it? My concern is because it is 2nd hand and they may be trying to pass it off.

 

Who made the card originally?

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

wow reading that just went right over my head lol, its the only graphics card in her tower , and she turns her pc off at night and she only plays her guild wars 2 game for a couple of hours a day , so im guessing it should be ideal for her gaming need

 

when she returned it they claimed to have done a stress test , all of 30 mins of it and provided no proof , just their word it was ok , it clearly looks like they are just passing it off , and it was a nvideo graphics card

Link to post
Share on other sites

it came in a anti static bag in the incorrect box as they didnt have the correct box for some reason

 

Think you may have answered your own question. If they did a stress test then why not ask for the results?

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Except you wanted to know if it was in GOOD condition> many graphics cards switch on and show something on screen. it doesnt mean theyll actually run any game or work for more than 5 minutes.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

thats what i thought to begin with , then i took it down to the computer shop to see if that was the case , and it was confirmed it was the graphics card , i was under the impression that i should go out and buy a 1000 w psu just to be over safe , but now i dont think i should

Link to post
Share on other sites

when she returned it they claimed to have done a stress test , all of 30 mins of it and provided no proof , just their word it was ok , it clearly looks like they are just passing it off , and it was a nvideo graphics card

 

30 mins is not long enough for a stress test , when I build systems its done overnight since you want to see temperatures and all sorts . as what the guy in your computer shop did . you cant get a full result in 30 mins

Link to post
Share on other sites

They know it was 2nd hand and it probably did that to the original owners PC too

 

I agree hit them with secondary costs too

Give them 14 days else you will seek legal advice toward issuing a county court claim without further notice

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My main struggle is trying to understand how a faulty graphics card can blow a psu?? It doesn't make sense.

A faulty psu can damage a gpu. But the other way round is weird.

 

You need a professional test report on the gpu to take this further.

A basic stress test is achievable in 30 mins. Its a simple process. A full stress test would be done overnight however and is fat more complex.

 

How much did the second shop charge you for the test when they blew two psu's?

Link to post
Share on other sites

My thoughts about it are that these are just buyers & sellers of 2nd hand equipment and don't think they have the knowhow on testing gear brought in. There are some very mixed reviews.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have also been advised to take it to pc world and ask them to do a stress test on it , to see what their outcome is ,

 

the second shop didnt charge me for the blown psu's as he does all my computer work and he offered this out of friendship ,

im assuming he had ome spare in stock and was happy to try them out ,

 

i dont know that much about the innards of pc's hence why i go to my computer guy :) ,

but yes i want to hit them where it hurts

 

i was polite the first time and tried explaining the situation which they blatantly mislead me it seems ,

i certainly wont be buying off these con artists again though

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldnt say con artists,

a lot of small businesses are run by people who dont know about consumer contract law so they are just ignorant as to what they are obliged to do under the circumstances.

 

Have you tried returning goods to busnesses that run stores an Amazon and Ebay?

 

i would say that a very large number of them are clueless about what your rights and their responsibilities are.

 

write to them explaining everything in detail and include chapter and verse of consumer rights act and give them time to do something about it.

 

If they cant replace then a refund is what you want.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...