Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • In that case I don't think you'd have any grounds for a claim against the receiver, short of anything actually criminal. The receiver was appointed by the lender so any claim you make should be aginst them. How much equity do you reckon there was when they took possession? Realistic value less outstanding balance (including arrears).  This messing around makes me wonder even more if the property was wildly over valued. Normally a lender would sell and not really care if they got the best price so long as they covered the balance plus their costs. 
    • Hey @lookinforinfo I'm not sure, I don't believe he told them he's the driver. He must have selected an option saying that he's appealing on behalf of the driver or something of the sort. In more news, however, these wannabe thugs are back at it again. Honestly, what a joke. In the letter they sent before this it said they had made "2 attempts" and in this letter they said "4 attempts", I wonder what happened to the "3rd attempt" lol.  WhatsApp Image 2024-04-18 at 14.06.07_44abc9c8.pdf
    • Hi all, I purchased a car in January from Big Motoring World Leeds. At the time of sale I was shown a tab on the salespersons computer marked 'service history' and I was able to take comfort knowing that the car had been serviced on 3 occasions as the date, mileage and company was there on screen. Being a 3 and a bit year old car that, in my mind, constituted full service history 🤷‍♂️ Anyway, collected the car a week later. Once home I settled down to through the book pack etc. Opened the service history booklet and it was completely blank. In addition there were no invoices detailing that any services had been done. I duly contacted BMW and asked them to supply me with proof of service history. They responded saying that on their 'vehicle documentation checklist' I had ticked and then signed to the fact that I had seen the service history and that I was happy with it. I dug out this checklist and what it actually states is 'seen service history online' which I had in the showroom. BMW seem to think that this satisfies their responsibility in providing service history. The reality is that I don't have any proof that the vehicle has ever been serviced! For my own peace of mind I ended up paying for a service that satisfied the manufacturers maintenance schedule to the tune of £330. I even complained to the finance company that the vehicle contravenes the Sale of Goods act 2015 as l, in effect, ot is not as described. Amazingly they weren't interested and instead I just got an email stating that it's not illegal to sell a vehicle without service history and that servicing costs were part and parcel of vehicle ownership. I've since complained to the ombudsman and am awaiting to see if they can help. I have no issue with the car but the treatment and customer service has been the worst I've ever experienced. I don't really know what to do next as I really do feel aggrieved that I've had to pay to service a car that should have already been serviced. Can anyone point me in the right direction please? 🙏
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Paid for goods not received - Advice needed


JEC1965
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2395 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All

 

I am looking for some help/advice on behalf of my mother-in law.

 

She had a new kitchen fitted last year.

Earlier this year she had a new boiler fitted need a new cupboard.

She contacted the installer directly and asked if he could source one.

 

He said he would have to order from abroad so stupidly she paid him in full. (over £900 pounds)

 

That was February and she still hasn't received the cupboard.

He does not keep in contact and she leaves messages which he never replies to.

 

He has a shop a few miles away but it never seems to be open.

The last time she spoke to him he promised delivery a few weeks ago but it never arrived.

 

He has his own company and I checked on companies house yesterday and it was dissolved in July. I think she paid him directly and not his company.

 

She has reported it to the police but they seem reluctant to do anything.

 

Could she make a claim against him to recover the money she has paid and if so what would her chances be?

Link to post
Share on other sites

When was the cheque paid (in relation to the date of the company’s dissolution in July) : it seems likely it was in February from your post, but I don’t want to assume...

 

Was the cheque made out to him personally, or to his company?

If she isn’t sure (check the cheque-stub?) she can ask her bank for a copy of the cancelled cheque.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then she can state her contract was with him personally, and sue him personally.

 

She should make “time of the essences” if she hasn’t already done so, in a letter before claim.

 

If she doesn’t get a refund / the cabinet within that reasonable time frame she can then issue a claim.

 

It seems likely she’d win a claim but the over-riding issue is

“If she won a claim would she be able to enforce it?”.

 

A claim won that is then unenforceable is a Pyrrhic victory.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Reverse the cheque?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your response.

 

 

I have told her to send him a letter asking for a refund and give him 14 days, (we got his home address from companies house) and to let him know that if she doesn't receive the refund within that timescale then she will make a claim against him.

 

 

“If she won a claim would she be able to enforce it?”. - Do you mean if he hasn't got any money to pay?? I suppose we will cross that bridge when we come to it.

 

 

DX100uk - the cheque was cashed a long time ago so that's not an option.

Link to post
Share on other sites

“If she won a claim would she be able to enforce it?”. - Do you mean if he hasn't got any money to pay?? I suppose we will cross that bridge when we come to it.

 

I suggest you cross that bridge before issuing a claim.

If he is ‘potless’ it’d be “throwing good money after bad”, so unless you don’t mind wasting the time involved and the cost to issue the claim .......

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is he trading still (but as an individual)?

Has he got other unsatisfied CCJ's against him that might suggest others have got CCJ's and struggled to enforce them?

 

Does he own where he lives outright? (check the land registry).

Does he own it at all?

 

It won't help with deciding on his solvency, but when it comes to enforcement: Can you get someone to phone him with "an order", and get his bank details?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I heard of fraudster who reverse a cheque after it's been cashed, so that's a possibility to explore.

To meet him face to face, give a tenner to a neighbour of his shop to call you when he shows up and promise a further reward.

You'll be surprised to see how helpful nosey neighbours could be.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...