Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Monika the first four pages of the Private parking section have at least 12 of our members who have also been caught out on this scam site. That's around one quarter of all our current complaints. Usually we might expect two current complaints for the same park within 4 pages.  So you are in good company and have done well in appealing to McDonalds in an effort to resolve the matter without having  paid such a bunch of rogues. Most people blindly pay up. Met . Starbucks and McDonalds  are well aware of the situation and seem unwilling to make it easier for motorists to avoid getting caught. For instance, instead of photographing you, if they were honest and wanted you  to continue using their services again, they would have said "Excuse me but if you are going to go to Mc donalds from here, it will cost you £100." But no they kett quiet and are now pursuing you for probably a lot more than £100 now. They also know thst  they cannot charge anything over the amount stated on the car park signs. Their claims for £160 or £170 are unlawful yet so many pay that to avoid going to Court. When the truth is that Met are unlikely to take them to Court since they know they will lose. The PCNs are issued on airport land which is covered by Byelaws so only the driver can be pursued, not the keeper. But they keep writing to you as they do not know who was driving unless you gave it away when you appealed. Even if they know you were driving they should still lose in Court for several reasons. The reason we ask you to fill out our questionnaire is to help you if MET do decide to take you to Court in the end. Each member who visited the park may well have different experiences while there which can help when filling out a Witness statement [we will help you with that if it comes to it.] if you have thrown away the original PCN  and other paperwork you obviously haven't got a jerbil or a guinea pig as their paper makes great litter boxes for them.🙂 You can send an SAR to them to get all the information Met have on you to date. Though if you have been to several sites already, you may have done that by now. In the meantime, you will be being bombarded by illiterate debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors all threatening you with ever increasing amounts as well as being hung drawn and quartered. Their letters can all be safely ignored. On the odd chance that you may get a Letter of Claim from them just come back to us and we will get you to send a snotty letter back to them so that they know you are not happy, don't care a fig for their threats and will see them off in Court if they finally have the guts to carry on. If you do have the original PCN could you please post it up, carefully removing your name. address and car registration number but including dates and times. If not just click on the SAR to take you to the form to send to Met.
    • In order for us to help you we require the following information:- [if there are more than one defendant listed - tell us] 1 defendant   Which Court have you received the claim from ? County Court Business Centre, Northampton   Name of the Claimant ? LC Asset 2 S.A R.L   Date of issue – . 28/04/23   Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for –    (1) The Claimant ('C') claims the whole of the outstanding balance due and payable under an agreement referenced xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and opened effective from xx/xx/2017. The agreement is regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 ('CCA'), was signed by the Defendant ('D') and from which credit was extended to D.   (2) D failed to comply with a Default Notice served pursuant to s87 (1) CCA and by xx/xx/2022 a default was recorded.   (3) As at xx/xx/2022 the Defendant owed MBNA LTD the sum of 12,xxx.xx. By an agreement in writing the benefit of the debt has been legally assigned to C effective xx/xx/2022 and made regular upon C serving a Notice of Assignment upon D shortly thereafter.   (4) And C claims- 1. 12,xxx.xx 2. Interest pursuant to Section 69 County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from xx/01/2023 to xx/04/2023 of 2xx.xx and thereafter at a daily rate of 2.52 to date of judgement or sooner payment. Date xx/xx/2023   What is the total value of the claim? 12k   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Yes   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? N/A Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit Card   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Online   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes, but amount differs slightly   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. DP issued claim   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Not that I recall...   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Not that I recall...   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? Yes   Why did you cease payments? Loss of employment main cause   What was the date of your last payment? Early 2021   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No   -----------------------------------
    • Hello CAG Team, I'm adding the contents of the claim to this thread, but wanted to open the thread with an urgent question: Do I have to supply a WS for a claim with a court date that states " at the hearing the court will consider allocation and, time permitting, give an early neutral evaluation of the case" ? letter is an N24 General Form of Judgement or Order, if so, then I've messed up again. Court date 25 May 2024 The letter from court does not state (like the other claims I have) that I must provide WS within 28 days.. BUT I have recently received a WS from Link for it! making me think I do need to!??
    • Massive issues from Scottish Power I wonder if someone could advise next steps. Tennant moved out I changed the electric into my name I was out the country at the time so I hadn't been to the flat. During sign up process they tried to hijack my gas supply as well which I made it clear I didn't want duel fuel from them but they still went ahead with it. Phoned them up again. a few days later telling them to make sure they stopped it but they said too late ? had to get my current supplier to cancel it. Paid £50 online to ensure there was money covering standing charges etc eventually got to the flat no power. Phoned Scottish Power 40 minutes to get through they state I have a pay as you go meter and that they had set me up on a credit account so they need to send an engineer out which they will pass my details onto. Phone called from engineer asking questions , found out the float is vacant so not an emergency so I have to speak to Scottish Power again. Spoke with the original person from Scottish Power who admitted a mistake (I had told her it was vacant) and now states that it will take 4 weeks to get an appointment but if I want to raise a complaint they will contact me in 48 hours and it will be looked at quicker. Raised a complaint , complaints emailed me within 24 hours to say it will take 7 days till he speaks with me. All I want is power in the property would I be better switching over to EON who supply the gas surely they could sort it out quicker? One thing is for sure I will never bother with Scottish Power ever again.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1951 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

Thanks to anyone who would mind taking the time to read this and advise me if possible.

 

I received a 2 fines from the magistrates court.

1 for no tv license (fair enough) and

one for driving without insurance (although the car wasn't been driven it was just parked on my street as it was broken down and id transferred my insurance onto a new vehicle.

Taxed to be on the road but didn't realise it had to be insured as well,

my bad but I guess that's by the by).

 

In the midst of this I was granted a debt relief order and was granted £300 by the official receiver to cover the TV license fine

(strange as that fine was for £200) but left the insurance fine outstanding.

 

initially as I wasn't working deductions were been made from my benefits.

When I returned to work in January 2017 this stopped

I didn't make any payments as id lost my paperwork and expected to hear from them regarding payments and thought id pick it up from there.

 

In the meantime I got myself another fine.

( I know, I know but it was cheaper to be found guilty and pay £400 than pay a solicitor to find me not guilty)

 

I began making payments for this fine immediately.

 

In mid May I received a letter from the South Yorkshire Enforcement unit giving me one reference number to cover all my fines.

 

It showed the amount i'd paid and the balance.

(though there was no reference to the £300 that the insolvency officer had written off under the DRO).

 

Again I continued making payments and have regularly paid £50 a month every since.

In total since April I have paid £560 towards the fines.

 

Then I received a letter from collectica.

A notice of enforcement.

Showing the correct balance of £883.50 but they have also added on £75 for god knows what.

 

I rang them and explained to the guy who answered that I had made regular payments to my fines and had been doing since April.

I asked if I could continue making payments at the amount I had been - £50.00.

 

This was a big no no.

He wanted half the money up front before agreeing to a payment plan.

 

 

I explained to him that I had just been discharged from my DRO and that I was very careful with my budgeting.

I tried to explain to him that by paying him more that I could afford

the money would have to come from another pot

i'd be sorting one problem and creating another.

 

 

He told me his was a priority debt,

I explained I have no other debt anymore and that this was the only one outstanding

my payment history should clearly show that I am trying my best to clear it.

We went back and forth for about half an hour.

 

I stood my ground.

I refused to pay anymore than I could afford,

explained that i'm certainly no sat with a 50" T.V on my wall and that if they come to my house the only thing they will find of value is my sons PS4 which is about 3 years old. (and my car which my mum bought me for work, now been parked out of the way of my house.

 

His final offer was of an initial payment of £280 and a payment plan.

Otherwise I would be charged for bailiffs attendance and get more fees, worst case scenario been arrested.

 

 

I told him at this point id welcome a change to plead my case in court.

Although I suspect they would rather just add more fees onto the debt that I have been trying to clear.

I told him this was the most insane act of bullying ever.

 

 

They can clearly say I have been making regular and timely payments directly to the court,

now they want to eliminate all that money

 

 

I've struggled to pay by sticking it back on in fees meaning that it will take me even longer to pay.

How the hell is that even I thing?!!!!

I told him I may as well have kept all the money I paid so that when they wanted an initial payment I could have made it.

This makes absolutely no sense to me.

I have worked my ass off to get out of debt and despite paying on time they are determined to land me back in it.

 

I got off the phone and resolved nothing.

He told me I have another few days to agree to his terms before a bailiff will call at my house

(he'll be very disappointed by the nothing of value that I have )

its hassle I just don't need.

I got off the phone and made my due payment of £50 but again to the courts not to collectica.

 

Does anyone have any advise for me please?

This is infuriating for me that they can see I am not ignoring the fines

I am paying each month yet they seen hell bent on making the debt larger.

 

Also can anyone advise what to do regarding the £300 the DRO shows they have allowed towards these fines that is not showing on the letter I received from the courts.

 

Many Thanks :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Magistrates fines cannot be included in dmp ivo or bankruptcy or dro.

No tv license is still, unfortunately a criminal offence.

 

Your payments taken from benefits rightly stop when you re start work for obvious reasons.

Its up to you to re start the payments not them chase you.

 

The amounts that you have paid have come off your total fines

but since you stopped payments the courts write to you, you have not replied.

They have issued a warrant of control.

 

This attracted a 75 compliance fee.

This is payable.

You cant get out of this.

 

They, collectica want the money and since its magistrates court fines they can force entry.

Link to post
Share on other sites

that does not sound great does it.

 

 

The courts however have never been in touch with me regarding non payment..

The only correspondence I received from them was to advise that the fines had been consolidated and to make future payments to a certain account number.

 

 

I had made 2 payments prior to that and never missed a payment since.

Ah well looks like I've fluffed it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They were in touch when you made the arrangement to pay thru deductions.

The warnings and things you need to do if circumstances change are all in jere

 

But you ain't fluffed it.

Collectica do take payment arrangements but you need a good deposit down and get rid of all balance within 6 months of the warrant being issued.

Bear in mind it might of been issued 2 months ago already.

 

In rare cases arrest warrants are issued for non payments of mag fines but its rare and normally for those with thousands in fines and them sticking two fingers up to the courts so to speak

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I received a 2 fines from the magistrates court.

1 for no tv license (fair enough) and one for driving without insurance.

 

In the midst of this I was granted a debt relief order and was granted £300 by the official receiver to cover the TV license fine (strange as that fine was for £200) but left the insurance fine outstanding.

 

initially as I wasn't working deductions were been made from my benefits. When I returned to work in January 2017 this stopped

I didn't make any payments as id lost my paperwork and expected to hear from them regarding payments and thought id pick it up from there.

 

In the meantime I got myself another fine.

 

I began making payments for this fine immediately.

 

In mid May I received a letter from the South Yorkshire Enforcement unit giving me one reference number to cover all my fines.

 

It showed the amount i'd paid and the balance, (though there was no reference to the £300 that the insolvency officer had written off under the DRO).

 

Again I continued making payments and have regularly paid £50 a month every since.

In total since April I have paid £560 towards the fines.

 

Also can anyone advise what to do regarding the £300 the DRO shows they have allowed towards these fines that is not showing on the letter I received from the courts.

 

Many Thanks :)

 

I will address the matter of Collectica shortly. In the meantime, can you confirm the following:

 

Are you sure that the Insolvency Service allowed the 'TV Licence' fine to be included in the DRO? This is very unusual as it is considered a court fine and as such, cannot be included in bankruptcy proceedings?

 

When you received notification from the court of the 3rd fine, did they agree the payment arrangement of £50 per month?

 

PS: What I am trying to establish was whether the payment arrangement was one that was agreed with the court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh no

i'm genuinely not doing that,

I've learned the hard way that it will all crash down If you don't pay what you owe trust me.

 

When the deductions were taken I was in a pretty bad place

it all just pretty much got ignored up until me finally hauling my ass and sorting a DRO.

 

The letter from the official receiver shows the amount allocated towards the magistrates fine

I had no idea that it wouldn't make a difference.

I guess it is what it is.

 

I will let them in, they will see I have nothing of value,

i'll keep making my monthly payments,

my debt will go up a few hundred quid

I suppose I will have to go from there and just keep plugging away at it.

 

Bad times

I simply cannot put myself in a position where I offer more than I can afford as that's not going to help anyone.

 

anks for the advise though, at least now I know where I stand and what's coming next.

 

I am positive that the official receiver signed £300 to magistrates fines. I have the paperwork in front of me and it is showing in black and white.

 

The third offence was for £400.

An initial payment of £200 ( which was paid) then £50.00 per month.

That agreement was made in march.

 

In May I received the consolidation letter from the courts.

It didn't mention anything about payments,

just to make future payments to a new account number which I have been doing ever since at £50.00 per month.

 

The 3rd fine is the only one I was given a set amount to pay.

The previous ones were initially deducted from my benefits.

 

Ah applogies it seems I've made an error. (maybe).

 

On the paperwork submitted to the official receiver it is showing magistrates fine at £200.

(this is what I told step change I owed for the TV license),

 

however on the paperwork I received from the official receiver it shows £300 to South Yorkshire Police.

 

I have no idea what that's for as the only time I've had dealing with them is over the car insurance and that turned into a magistrates fine as well.

Seems I've confused myself.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I've started a new thread due to confusion.

 

Here goes.....please don't judge I'm just looking for advice on what collectica can/cant do next.

 

I received 2 magistrate fines last year

- one for tv license and

one for thinking my broken down car only had to be taxed outside my house

(i'd swapped the insurance onto a new vehicle and was landed with the driving with no insurance fine even though it wasn't drivable).

 

At the time payment deductions were been deducted from my benefits.

I also managed to sort myself out and take out a DRO.

I'm now discharged and due to my paperwork from Step Change including the TV licence fine I thought that was included however I know now it can't have been.

 

In January after been out of work for 5 years I managed to get myself back into a good part time job.

Obviously my benefits stopped so too did the deductions for these fines.

I didn't have any paperwork and in all honestly pretty much forgot about the fines or stupidly figured they'd send me something to advise the deductions had stopped.

 

In March I was in court after a bouncer tried to grope me in a nightclub and I hit him.

The court hearing was set to the first day of a new job I was starting and they refused to change it.

Right or wrong I chose to go to work thinking that i'd be far more out of pocket if I lost my job

sent a letter into the court explaining what had happened and why I was not there.

I was found guilty in my absence and a warrant was issued I handed myself in.

 

I was fined £400.

I had never been in a courtroom before and did not qualify for legal aid at the time

I agreed to pay £200 at the end of the month and £200 the following month.

I literally just wanted to get out of there.

 

The first payment of £200 was made.

Then I phoned the court and explained i'd agreed to more than I could really afford due to panic and asked if I could pay £50.00 per month.

This was verbally agreed.

 

In May I received a letter from the South Yorkshire Enforcement Unit.

This was a notice of consolidation.

It listed all m fines and the balance and advised future payments be made to a new account number.

 

My payments continued.

I have made regular timely payments since March totalling £560.00.

 

That notice of consolidation was the last piece of correspondence I received from the courts

I had been regularly making the £50 per month payment with no idea they obviously didn't feel it was acceptable.

 

Last week I then received a notice of enforcement from a company called Collectica.

The balance of £883.50 has now jumped up £75 as I understand is correct for their fees,

although I can't really understand why it has been passed to them.

 

Straight away I called them up.

I explained I had been making regular payments for 6 months and asked if I could continue this.

This was refused.

 

 

He told me unless I paid half the amount I could not agree a payment plan.

I explained this was impossible and that since my DRO I live on a very carefully planned budget and only live within my means.

I also explained that fully understood the debt was mine to pay,

that I had no other debts

this was of course my priority

however I see no point in solving one problem to inevitably cause another because that's what got me in a mess in the first place.

I simply stood my ground.

 

 

He advised me that if I didn't pay the amount an enforcement agent would visit my house and take goods to the value.......

I told him this seemed ludicrous.

That would mean that the payments I had made every month would have been for nothing.

Had I not paid them and put them to one side I could almost have afforded the initial payment he was asking for hence leading to an agreement on a payment plan without incurring further charges.

 

At no point have I tried to dispute this debt is mine.

It is and I will pay it, I'm not trying to get out of it I simply cannot afford to pay what he is asking for.

 

 

I also doubt he could find the value of what I owe in goods in my house.

I have a super old lap top and my son has a 3 year old ps4 that he got for xmas.

My t.v's are certainly not new, large or modern.

I cannot afford luxuries at the moment.

All I have is the car my mum bought me so that I can take my kids to school and get to work on time.

I certainly do not want them to take this.

 

My biggest worry is that they will take my car or add further charges onto this debt.

That will just take me back to square one and I desperately don't want to go back there.

I'm starting to think i'd have been better off staying on benefits and what kind of thinking is that.

 

Can anyone please take the time to advise me of what would be the best thing to do.

What can/cant the enforcement agent do if he comes to my house.

Will they already know I have a car and the Reg so that they can look for it if I park it somewhere else?

 

Many Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not at all sure that starting a new thread has made the position any clearer but anyway.....

 

Yesterday, in your earlier thread, I queried a payment made by the Insolvency Service of £300 under your DRO and I notice that you have now confirmed that the payment had been allocated to South Yorkshire Police and not as you initially thought....to cover the TV Licence fine.

 

From what I can see, (and I confess to still being confused), you had been up to date with payments to the court under your agreement reached in May this year. I therefore cannot understand why your account has been passed to Collectica.

 

I really do think that you need to speak with the court in the morning to find out what actually has happened in this case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

From what I can see, (and I confess to still being confused), you had been up to date with payments to the court under your agreement reached in May this year. I therefore cannot understand why your account has been passed to Collectica.

 

.

 

Because op states payments were being taken automatically from.benefits and then came off and didn't make any payments. So the op stopped paying an arrangement

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for any confusion. The agreement of £50.00 per month was made in april in respect of the assault fine of £400.

 

Regarding the previous fine no arrangement was made following my benefits ending I just received a notice of consolidation and continued paying £50 per month so I assume this is why it has gone to collectica.

 

Any ideas what their next move will be and what they can and can't do?

 

 

Looks like I'm going to deal with them regardless and i'll continue payments no problem, its the addition of extra fees that is bothering me considering they can see I've been making payments since April in excess of what they would have deducted had I still been on benefits.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I now understand a bit better.

 

If there is still money owed under the 'assault' fine, then please make sure that you do not default with paying the court.

 

Clearly, you must come to an agreement with Collectica in relation to the other fines. I appreciate that you state that the enforcement agent could come into your home and that he would see for himself that you do not have any goods etc. Whilst many times I have suggested to clients that this route would assist them, the fact remains that in YOUR case, I would not be advising this route for two reasons:

 

One, you have a car and I would be concerned that that asset could be 'taken into control' by the enforcement agent. I appreciate that you 'need' the car for your children needs but unfortunately, this would not make the vehicle exempt.

 

And secondly, an enforcement agent visit would increase the debt by way of an enforcement fee of £235.

 

Can you remind us agin what payment arrangement Collectica were willing to accept (and when by).

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello and thankyou for the reply.

 

I have paid £200 to the direct account number and then a further £360 since the consolidation letter came. The assault fine was £400. I have just continued paying the £50 monthly so that it can bring the balance of the other fines down.

 

Collectica requested half of the money in order to even consider a payment arrangement. I genuinely don't have it otherwise trust me i'd be paying it because the stress is awful.

 

I have written a joint email to the magistrates and collectica detailing my situation and practically begging them to allow me to continue at £50 a month and have offered a further £20 though I will scrape as much as possible away in addition to this to get it paid because the situation really is awful when you are offering all you can afford and it's refused and you're in danger of incurring even more fees.

 

I am literally trying my best. They don't care and I don't expect them to but I just really want to get this sorted and will continue to plug away at the debt.

 

I'm going to move my car somewhere else. Without it theres a good chance i'll end up back on benefits and that's not really going to help anyone. Are they likely to know what car I have and drive around specifically looking at it?

 

There should be no money owing in respect of the assault fine as far as I can see.

 

 

Whats confusing me about this is after paying the first instalment of £200 I received the consolidation letter so all the fines have been clubbed together under a new account number which is what I've been using to pay £50 per month.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just talk to the courts. They pull the strings.

Unless a visit is made, collectica wont know if you have a car or not and only then if its on the drive or parked outside.

They cannot do a dvla check on a name and address to see if a vehicle matches. They can check a registration that they see at a property to see who its registered too

Link to post
Share on other sites

There should be no money owing in respect of the assault fine as far as I can see. Whats confusing me about this is after paying the first instalment of £200 I received the consolidation letter so all the fines have been clubbed together under a new account number which is what I've been using to pay £50 per month.

 

As I said earlier, I would suggest that you speak with the council in the morning in any event. You should not wait to receive a reply to your email as it is likely that your account may move from the present 'compliance stage' to 'enforcement stage' and the application of an enforcement fee of £235.

 

Another point that you must bear in mind is that if you pay the court direct after a warrant has been issued, then that payment will be automatically forwarded to Collectica (or Marston Holdings as the case may be). The following is a copy of a post that I made on this forum last year regarding a Parliamentary Question in the House of Commons on this very subject (paying the court direct.....minus bailiff fees).

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?463958-Government-Minister-s-statement-regarding-court-fines-bailiff-fees-pro-rata-distribution-and-paying-the-court-direct&p=4895624&viewfull=1#post4895624

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Got a very similar problem, was paying through the courts lost my job and not receiving benefits they sent me a letter saying they will take from my pension but never did..

 

Got a fine with costs of £546 called Collectica to discuss payment to resolve issue....they demanded £165 upfront before they would discuss monthly payment scheme..

 

I only get £180 a month via private pension so offered them £50 per month which they refused I then spoke to CA who put me in touch with National Debtlinetwork who outlined a few things.

 

So last night somebody loaned me the money to pay £200 until my pension comes through which i paid last night, I called them back today to set up a plan only to be told because I hadn't paid it over the phone to them direct and done it via bank transfer..they could set up payment plan but first payment would be next week of £103...and not at the end of next month.

 

Is this right ?

 

The staff are very arrogant people and in his words they are not there to help, just to make sure they get payment as quick as possible my financial situation is of no concern to him.

 

It's either I agree his terms or face further action even though there is no way I can pay next week.

Edited by ahowell1
Link to post
Share on other sites

thread is old

you wont get seen here

start a new thread

of your own please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...